Текст книги "The Last Gambit"
Автор книги: (IP of the USSR) Internal Predictor of the USSR
сообщить о нарушении
Текущая страница: 19 (всего у книги 21 страниц)
Well, what can you say about this article, Watson?
It’s rather strange, I think, Holmes, it seems to have some double sense. It’s surprisingly enough, that all fishermen’s surnames and places have bird species in their base: Eagle-owl, Brood hen, Dove, Eagle Lake, “Gull”. And the opposition between spinningers and “primitives with sticks” is not comprehensible, and neither the bait in the form of “pike disfigured by life”.
What concerns “bird names”, you can remember, that in the third “picnic” dead fish was placed in the lake with “bird name” too – the “Swan lake”.
And now, Watson, translate, please the title of the article to the left. Under it there’s the photo of Konchalovski, Russian cinema-director, famous in the West.
“Konchalovski take pictures in “mad house”. And soothing lower: “Yesterday Andrei Konchalovski, the cinema-director, has called press-conference in the object of shooting the film “House of fools”. Shooting takes place in one of Moscow psychiatric clinics”.
And commentaries to the photo?
“Andrei Konchalovski makes the report from mad house”.
Well, Watson, everything is clear enough. Russians call mad houses “yellow houses”. There’s “Yellow house” in the third “picnic”. I was told about this object in Spain, and Galba enlightened you on this point, obviously. And now, Watson, let’s turn to the sixth page: look at this photo of Bush in Congress, and at the slogan above his head: “IN GOD WE TRUST”. Translate, please, the title of the article and what’s printed under it.
“Boundless justice” or “Who is not with us, he is against us” – President Bush declared.” And under it there’s brief annotation to the article:
“USA President George Bush addressed Congress with a speech, which could be ascribed to the category of annual messages “About the state of the country”. However, this time the speech concerned the state of America, as well as of the world in whole. Bush said that foreign countries had only two alternatives: “to be with America, or with terrorists. A third is not given.”
To the right there’s little note to the article:
“The original name of the future operation – “Boundless justice” – can be changed. One of reporters, accredited by Pentagon, said during the press conference of USA Defence Minister Donald Ramsfeld: some American scientists, Muslims, are against such name of the operation. The opponents insist that it doesn’t accord to the truth, because only God (or Allah) can decide such justice. “I understand, I understand” – said Ramsfeld. This is the second linguistic conflict in Washington for the last week. Before it many Muslims categorically against the expression “the crusade against terrorism”, used by Bush, and his assistants quickly swept away this epithet from President’s lexicon”.
And the caption under the photo speaks as following: “By Congressmen’s opinion, it was the best speech of President Bush during the time of his rule”.
Watson; and what interesting does the author notice in that speech?
Nothing special, besides two places, worth paying attention, to my mind. The first: “Speaking about talib regime, Bush used such expressions, which no American leader used since fascism times”. And the second:
“During his speech the President said about important official appointment. He initiated new post in the country, which could be called “National Safety and Defence Minister”. New member of the Cabinet should control all questions, dealing with overcoming the threats to America from the outside. This post was given to State Pennsylvania governor, energetic and popular in his country, Tom Ridge. He will coordinate the activity of 40 federal agencies, and also of according state governments. The special feature of this office is that its appointment doesn’t need the approval of Senate, and neither any special law.”
Holmes listened to me attentively and asked to translate the title of the article and the caption to the photo below.
“Generals offered three bases to America”, and the subtitle: “Marxists and Muslims don’t want to help “imperialists””. The caption under the picture: “Indian solders are frequent to war”.
And is there something interesting in the text of the article, Watson?
It seems, that nothing special: Indian government offers USA their bases for struggling against terrorists, and the leaders of Indian Muslims are against such decision of their government. I can’t find anywhere any word about Indian Marxists, if not to consider “Indian National congress” to be Marxist, and it’s against too, by the way, as well as Indian Muslims. And by the way, “Indian national congress” is discontented with educational programs in Indian schools: they say that Hinduism is not represented attractively in them. But essentially, Indian caste system is not only one of Hinduism manifestation, but, as you told, one of fascism forms. And what’s the result: according to the “Post Historical Picnic”, Russia withstood the attack of “Indian battle elephant” – very old “battle elephant” – and now it’s the turn of USA to encounter with it.
Yes, Watson, it seems like that. May be, Galba was right, when he was speaking about international-socialism, impending to USA, and about forming of American Gestapo, which would be more powerful than Stalin’s NKVD and Hitler’s Gestapo together. According to the title “National Safety and Defence Minister”, power of new American minister exceeds that of Heinrich Himmler, who was the leader of SS and, besides that, the head of criminal police of the Reich. And the slogan “Who is not with us, he is against us!” famous in the times of Russian Revolution of 1917 is Trotskyites’ but not Bolsheviks’ slogan. It seems, that permanent revolution goes on, but in new conditions; and the subtitle of the article devoted to the reaction of different circles to Bush’s speech in Congress – “Marxists and Muslims don’t want to help to «imperialists»” – has double sense on the matrix level: from the one side, it is a sign that Trotskyism uses Islam in its own interests, and from the other side, it is a defence from probable accusation of America in stepping Trotskyism and fascism up.
Why do you think so, Holmes?
You see by your own, Watson, that the word “imperialists” in the subtitle goes with the quotation marks. It allows thinking that this word means the bourgeois democrats ruling USA, when shifting to the ideological sense row, where “Muslims” and “Marxists” belong. And what we have in whole – our suspicions about Trotskyism, expressed right on the day of this news-paper appearing, have had certain base under them, and the sixth page is devoted essentially to the “Defence Picnic”, if to follow the Trotskyite Galba in its interpretation. But in this case there should be a sign on this page, which would prove its connection with the second “picnic”. I have no other ideas about the “pictures”, so you, Watson, should seek for this sign in the other articles of this page independently.
I started reading the text of other three articles on the page six. Holmes began puffing his pipe and became absorbed in texts and pictures of the “Defence Picnic” one more time.
It seems to me, I’ve found it. There’s the article by Georgy Stepanov – “Explosion, but not terrorist act”. I’ll read the brief annotation of it to you, Holmes, and you’ll see:
“Yesterday in Toulouse (South France) terrible explosion took place. An oil-chemistry plant AZF exploded; it was located in the industrial zone of 900-thousand city. 15 were killed, and 200 damaged. 50 wounded are in hard condition.”
May be also, that the article by Georgy Ilyin, “Old Acquaintance”, can be useful for us. It reports about 72-years-old Arnold Ruitel, ex-member of CC of Estonian Communistic Party, who became the second president of Estonia in post-Soviet era.
Well, Watson, it’s enough for maintaining the matrix-level connection between sixth page and the “Defence Picnic”, where Pisa and Toulouse are mentioned in the “Song about Marshals”. And Marxists-Trotskyites in contemporary history are “old acquaintances” indeed. Thus, the next page is 7. What’s there?
“Contemporary Stories”.
What does it mean, Watson?
It is the heading of the seventh page, and it is devoted to the trial as such: the vessel “Petr Vasev” rammed the passenger ship “Admiral Nakhimov” in the Black Sea on the August 31, 1986. “Admiral Nakhimov” sank in eight minutes. There were 1243 passengers on the board, 423 perished.
What do we have on the eighth page, Watson?
According to the headings, Holmes, nothing. But there’s something interesting on the ninth page – I mean this picture, where two are sawing someone hanged upside down. It resembles something in your notes, Holmes, doesn’t it?
Yes, Watson, there was a conversation about Isaiah-prophet, who was sawed by wooden saw by the order of Judea ruler Manasseh. The Count remembered this story by association with the day of “truncating of John the Baptist’s head”, which takes its place on September 11. So, there is a warning about the impending catastrophe, expressed in the “Post Historical Picnic”, on the 7th page on the matrix level, and on the 9th page there’s information about the very day of catastrophe. Well, Watson, everything is true. As I remember, on the 10th page we will find the proof that we are dealing with the matrix-scenario of the third “picnic”.
With these words Holmes unfolded the tenth page, and I actually saw the photo of the monkey from the third “picnic”.
What about are the headings of the articles, connected with the photo of the monkey?
“Chimpanzee can read”, with the subheading below – “And the skilled prestidigitator doesn’t know the secrets of his tricks”. Under the photo there’s the caption: “Let me read!”, and under it there’s very strange report in the department “Inappropriate”: “Terrorist didn’t like circus”. Should I translate it?
Yes, Watson, please.
“63-years-old pensioner was detained in Saint-Petersburg, suspected of knowingly false call about the bomb in the building of Circus upon Fontanka. The call to police was made on September 9. Policemen surrounded the building and evacuated all visitors and performers. As the result of searches the carton box with the caption “Bomb” on its side was found. On the base of the fact of anonymous report about bomb it was brought a lawsuit on the paragraph about knowingly false report about the act of terrorism, providing for the confinement of 3 years or less.”
And what does it mean, Holmes, to your opinion?
Watson, don’t you remember when was the Iranian from the German jail trying to warn Washington about probable terrorist act?
It seems to me, that it happened on the September 9.
And who is the “chief prestidigitator” today, susceptible to the effect of “monkey’s paw”, as the result of which he ceased to understand secrets of his own tricks?
If I’m correct in understanding the meaning of “circus shapito”, then the chief prestidigitator is Global Predictor – biblical znakharstvo.
But the most interesting thing, Watson, is this photo on the 11th page, which explains, why the “chief prestidigitator” doesn’t know and doesn’t understand his tricks. Translate, please, the text under the picture.
“Football-players were fighting for a ball blindly: “Torpedo”-players were in white T-shirts, British were in dark.”
Yes, Watson, light “Atonists” and dark “Amonists” seem to have been playing too much. You know from the note “About tandem principle of activity”, that 22 hierophants, having hidden in Levi’s generation, couldn’t vanish totally from matrixes of existence, and so they should mark themselves symbolically. How do you think, Watson, what can associate the activity of hierophants and football?
The first, as well as second, are divided into two groups, 11 men in each, and the subject of their attention is a “round object”. The difference is that the hierophants were not struggling in teams for undivided possessing it, while Egypt ruling was based on the tandem principle, and each of football teams are fighting for it – in order to send it to the goal, in the gates, past the goal-keeper of the other team[122]. So, the football game symbolizes the schism in Egyptian branch of global conceptual power, doesn’t it?
Correct, Watson, and now – look at the football ball above the heads of “blind” players. Can you see Western and Eastern hemispheres and the Atlantic Ocean between them on its surface, though in rudely stylised form? And – laugh at it or not – but there are sharply 4 football players on the photo: according to the number of the most general categories in the Amen’s set: space, time, matter, energy (or spirit). And the headings to the left and below the photograph – what does they mean?
To the left – “Game in the wind”, and below – “Kutuzov’s glory”. What is it about, how do you think, Holmes?
Holmes took the “Defence Picnic” once more and pointed to the picture with solder in helmet and caption to it “Where does the wind blow?” and then – to the words from “The song about Marshals” – “Kutuzov’s offspring Puzo and Jago.”
This is the sign of association of the third “picnic with the second and third days of GKChP: Pugo is the surname of USSR Domestic Minister that period of time, and Jazov was the Defence Minister in the times of GKChP. Watson, and then please let’s look at the last, twelfth page of this paper.
It seems to return us to the first, the “Historical Picnic”, and at the same time to sum up three rebuses in whole. Look at the article in the right column, entitled “Feel the Resemblance”, by Yuri Bogomolov. I’ll read the annotation first:
“The landscape of New York after the catastrophe turned into almost emblematic picture: the cut skeleton of the building on the background of blue sky – it’s the view from the lower point. The upper foreshortening: uncoloured piles of concrete, iron and glass, and people in bright orange clothes and glittering red helmets between them. This site of fire turned into speaker’s rostrum for a moment. It happened when President Bush stood upon it and addressed to nation through his megaphone. They (President and people) were united in this historic minute. As we were some time. When Eltsin stood on the tank. People on the other side of the ocean understand everything. Crime was committed, and inevitable punishment must follow. In our country, we continue discussing”.
Well, Watson, and what about are discussions on the other side of the ocean?
Mainly, Holmes, they discuss a problem: “Why has it happened with America?”
And what conclusions do they come to, Watson?
The range of versions is alike in or country: from “America is too greedy” to “there’s too many democracy in the world”. But the most interesting point in this discussion, called “Brain storm” by author for some reasons, is the assessment of Russian liberal views. If you don’t mind, Holmes, I will translate this paragraph wholly.
Of course, Watson. The paper is pro-western, liberal, and self-assessments are always interesting.
“The most popular answer is – there are too many “hungry and slaves”[123]. Social inequality in the West is too obvious and class approach triumphs. And not only in left heads. Respectable liberal heads are occupied with it as well. He seems to be clever man, liberal, moreover, western-supporter, but look thoroughly – he is no more than Marxist. To the question about Chechnya he would answer that people there struggle for its national independence. Being asked about terrorism, he would say, that it is a sequence of social inequality in the world”.
Yes, Watson, it’s really interesting conclusion about the essence of contemporary liberalism in Russia, and it coincides with Inner Predictor’s conclusions: Liberals, ruling the country today, and Marxists, opposite to them, are concealed or potential Trotskyites by their essence, though the author of the article didn’t want to call things their names. Why didn’t Galba understand that, I wonder?
I think, Holmes, that Galba is an overt Trotskyite, though, as I understood from the conception materials, hidden and open Trotskyites are united by psychical Trotskyism.
And what does it mean, Watson?
COB authors introduced this term for individuals, who reject their own declarations by reticences. It corresponds to the concept of “obsession” in Christian and Islam lexicon, and Bogomolov seems to develop this idea further in the article “Something stringer, than Gorky’s «Mother»”. He comments the reaction of Palestinian mothers on young Arabs suicide. I’d rather translate this paragraph wholly too.
Yes, Watson, please. All the more, that, as I remember, Galba told you something about Gorky’s novel “Mother”?
You’re right, Holmes, so:
“There, on the screen, not so young woman was dancing and singing with children. She might be their mother. When the subject about shakhids went on, one would remember her. The kamikazes among them were not so astonishing, as she was. Her son exploded himself voluntary, and took several lives with him. She regretted nothing. Everything was all right. We have the image of mother in our literature – Nilovna. She regretted nothing too. She blessed her only son for revolutionary, risky struggle for all humankind happiness. But it’s rather hard to imagine her brightening up, when she gets to know about Pavel’s death. Her gladness in this case…
Palestinian mother brightened up, rejoiced and said that felt happy. Happy bride. Neighbours congratulated them both, rejoiced together with them over their great good luck in this life. It is something irrational, from our point of view. It wouldn’t be correct to call it inhumaneness. May be, above-humaneness? Or super-humaneness?”
Yes, Watson, that’s the “resemblance”. We felt. Bogomolov (significant surname as such) seems to unit fascism and Trotskyism of “super humans” involuntary by this question. To tell nothing about that he has solved the rebus of the first picture in the “Historical Picnic”.
Speaking this, Holmes unfolded the first “picnic” and pointed to the branch “Nilovna” and “Zeus on the armoured car”.
It seems to be Watson, that terrorists-kamikazes of Arabian origin– Trotskyites in Islam, were indicated in matrix-scenario of the “Historical Picnic” as early as 1991. Yes, Galba may be quoted here: “what they were fought for has been their undoing”. And at the same time I’m absolutely sure, that neither author of the article, nor editorial staff, nor “overt” Trotskyite Galba knew anything about “picnics”, though almost entire paper “Izvestiya” of September, 22 was devoted to this Russian rebus, and Galba told you everything about each of three “picnics”.
Wait, Watson, – Watson interrupted his friend’s reasoning, – I think there is a connection with the backside of the “Historical Picnic”.
What do you mean, Watson?
Do you remember about six films, applied to the first “picnic”? Here, – I pointed to the left column of the twelfth page, – there is a heading “The Outrage of Naked Gods” in the department of “Tele-cinema on the week-end”, and after it – a list of six films: “The Envy of Gods”, “Naked Maja”, “The Drops of Rain on Burning Rocks”, “Escape from New York”, “Traffic” and “The Outrage”, with short annotation to each. Should I translate?
No, Watson, you shouldn’t. Everything is clear enough. I was thinking it over for long, why first and second “picnics” have the application with films, and the third doesn’t. It appeared, but only after completing the matrix-scenario. The fellows were late … they lost their “prediction” qualification, the ability to predict on the base of foresight, didn’t they? Essentially, this film-list indicates the algorithm of the “Post Historical Picnic”, but … but only after the matrix has turned towards its masters – biblical znakharstvo. So, that’s why “The Envy of Gods” – biblical quacks are polytheists and idolaters by their essence, they pretend to enter the huge throng of Olympic gods. That’s why Eros, ancient Greek god of love, is on the “top” of the third “picnic”. But in fact, money is their “god”, and the “god” of biblical civilization created by them. And that’s why there stood a statue of a “calf”, huge and shining, like made of pure gold, as I know, between two twin-buildings of WTC. It hardly has been burnt down and turned into dust as the result of explosions and fires, the most probable thing, that it has been covered with debris or, perhaps, crushed. “Naked Maja” is associated with “Aphrodite Beautifully-rumped”; I don’t feel like commenting “The drops of rain…” for that is all they can oppose to new conception with epic Russian name of “Dead water”; the whole world was watching “Escape from New York” on the September 11 and “Traffic” is a peculiar symbol of Western civilization, securing its stability of crowd-“elitism” and leading to its “Outrage” i.e. to death.
And still, Holmes, how do you think, is Bin Ladin involved in destroying the twin-towers on September 11 or not?
You see, Watson, he is, but not more than Gorbachev was involved in destroying USSR. May be. It can be said, that his real fault is even less, than Gorbachev’s. But in Bin Ladin’s case, as well as in Gorbachev’s, very powerful forces stand behind their backs. Choosing the candidature for the image of enemy, these forces assess his ambitiousness. Bin Ladin appeared the most suitable for this role, in spite of all his billions, and thanks to his ambitiousness and demonic type of psychical structure. Gorbachev answers to the accusation of destroying USSR, which still sound directed against him: “How could I be so courageous to start reformations… I might have been sitting in the General Secretary’s chair still”[124]. That means the following: “Such were the objective circumstances, and Soviet Union was doomed to inevitable split by all its totalitarian past, which Gorbachev was struggling against allegedly”.
But he could have been called really courageous, if he wouldn’t have betrayed the multi-national people of USSR, even having seen the half of his head laying on the table in front of one of presidium members; he could have been called courageous, if he wouldn’t have succumbed to destroying aggregor-matrix algorithms, destroying USSR in accordance with USA NSC-20/1 Directive of August 18, 1948, but if he would have found and realized some constructive alternative.
It could have saved USA from September 11 terrorist acts: Afghanistan became the main base of vakhabits and refuge of terrorists and drug-dealers in the last ten years of 20th century only as a sequence of Gorbachev’s betraying of USSR and pro-Soviet regime of Nagibula.
In the case of Soviet Union the role of enemy was given to GKChP with trembling hands. But you must remember, Watson what Galba told you about agitation point and advertising campaign: if one agitation point of socialism is destroyed, than one agitation point of capitalism should be destroyed too, if they have decided that “we’ll our, new world will construct”. But stereotype is impossible in the deed of destroying the “agitation points” of old world, which let keep world in balance by balancing between them, because in opposite case even the crowd, thoughtlessly watching pictures on their screen, would understand everything. For destroying the agitation point of capitalism the other method is needed and nothing dealt with associative links with ancient Greek mythology, because biblical znakharstvo understood, that the trick of global circus Shapiro – “such were the objective circumstances” – wouldn’t go this time. But they needed the “friend” of White House. Watson, you know that big family of Ladins was the “friend” of White House, and the circus trick – is Osama Bin Ladin himself as “prodigal son”[125] of rich family – belongs to the sphere of mythology too. And here we encounter with Rembrandt and his striking piece “Returning of Prodigal Son” once more. Besides what count read on the villa “Askania-Nova” from the paper “Chas Pick” №151 of October, 14, 1997 in this connection, a very strange phrase I’ve found in this newspaper, which lead my reasoning to such conclusions.
Holmes took a newspaper from the table, with a photo of disfigured “Danaë” and, pointing by his finger on the marked paragraph, asked to translate it.
I began translating:
“Today’s world is full of cruelty and violence. In the end of 20th century more and more works of art become the victims of maniacs. Rembrandt is the leader in a field of such crimes. His paintings attract madmen with a peculiar force”.
Listening to me, Holmes was remembering something (as he said afterwards, he remembered the conversation with count on the villa).
I finished reading the paper, and showed with all my appearance, that I was ready to listen to Holmes’s further explanations.
Watson, haven’t you heard something about maniac’s attack on Rembrandt’s picture “Returning of prodigal son” from the press or television? – Holmes asked and not waiting for the answer he continued:
No, Watson, don’t look for it, such things never repeat, because stereotype is impossible, when the question is about methods of matrixes realization. Algorithm of the myth about “prodigal son” hasn’t been blocked, and everything in America goes according to plan. May be, there was some plot too, as in USSR before August putsch. Look, how persistently all world TV channels make the crowd frequent to the image of the enemy, every day since September, 11 – they demonstrate the beard and blank all-forgiving look of Osama Bin Ladin. There’s no hatred or self-admiring in this look, unlike it was with Hitler or Mussolini. Doesn’t it remind you something?
Yes, really, – I thought suddenly, – this view or foreshortening of terrorist №1, as he is demonstrated by mass media, is familiar to me somehow. Look or foreshortening? “Long-awaited foreshortening”, – I remembered the caption under Anna Kurnikova photo.
While I was remembering the “long-awaited foreshortening”, Holmes took big album of Rembrandt’s pictures from the bookshelves of his study, and opened it on the page with the reproduction of “Returning of prodigal son”. I looked at the face of blind old man, who put his arms on “prodigal son’s” shoulders, and freeze: If the blind man opened his eyes, he would be the very image of Osama Bin Ladin[126]. I’ve got chills up and down my spine.
COMMENT: Next to Rembrandt’s “Returning of Prodigal Son” piece there are photos of Osama bin Ladin. The upper photo, which rather clearly repeats the old person’s face, is the mirror image of the real photo. The lower one is the real photo.
If there’s a myth and its material realization, than its algorithm stepping up and an energetic filling of the matrix should take place too, – Holmes uttered slowly.
What, one more attempt on Rembrandt’s masterpiece?
No, Watson, the psyche’s attempt to destroy the picture “Danaë” is blockage of myth’s algorithm, but I speak about energetic feeding of matrix. It may be some mass show, like those, which the CC CPSU leaders organized on the days of people’s festivals, or … spectacle. Wait, Watson, I’ve read somewhere, that Dyagilev staged a ballet “Prodigal Son” on Prokofiev’s music in times of great depression of 30s. And there they said, that every famous dancer of 20th century has whenever taken part in this ballet in leading role, for this is the theatre of one actor, and every performer could declare his individuality in full measure in this ballet. So, Watson, if you hear somewhere about the staging of “Prodigal Son”, you know – it is energetic feeding of New Testament myth about “Prodigal son” by the emotions of aesthetics-liking crowd, and Bin Ladin is the signboard of this myth.
Holmes, so what’s that… what is going on? – I muttered mostly for myself.
Magic, Watson, it is social magic. And everything goes in a way ringleaders of the cult need it. It’s rather probable, that video-cassette with Bin Ladin, speaking about his involving it terrorist acts, would be demonstrated to the crowd, and then, when passions are too hot, the other video-cassette would be shown – with his volunteer leaving for the next world. The further is simple: to get rid of the beard and blank look, to make plastic operation on the face, and our Bin Ladin, having made the most important deed in his life by his 44, will dissolve in “new world order” and may be, will even take part in managing it.
Yes, Watson, all these pictures, films, performances are products of biblical culture and manifestations of its moral collapse, which happened accompanied with well-intended words about the role of “ten commandments”, “love to a neighbour” and so on. And the story told by Galba in the bar of “Woldorf” and the photos and texts in “Izvestiya” are the best illustration of the statement that “matrix is everywhere”. People, not knowing about that, re-translated the matrix-scenarios of three “picnics” by their live language of symbols, and they proved by doing it that matrixes belong to objective reality, the same way as our homes, food, and every-day stuffs. And matrixes should be learnt to use them for the good of human being, not for doing harm. But for understanding the essence of matrixes one should become human, that means – to exceed over animal, zombie and demonic psychical structure, but it’s not so easy, as all human history shows.
And still, Holmes, whoever were the artists who created the “picnics” – their psychical health was in great danger, to my mind. That all is simply incredible! What’s the sense of … writing about that all … so frankly and by them themselves?
Perfectly noticed, Watson, – answered Holmes, – I was thinking the same in the beginning. And then I understood – why not? Especially, if to take into account, that they often don’t understand what they write, because most of them are zombies or self-establishing demons by their psychical structure. What part of our compatriots is able for scrupulous, sharp logical analysis of political events during dozens of years? And do people have time to stop and think about what’s happening about them, when they are busy with every-day life problems, live in debt and under interest, muted by increasing aggressive informational flood? It’s really the game without rules, but also without risk, Watson, from the point of view of its bigwigs, who have forgotten about the limits of God’s allowance.
