Текст книги "The Last Gambit"
Автор книги: (IP of the USSR) Internal Predictor of the USSR
сообщить о нарушении
Текущая страница: 11 (всего у книги 21 страниц)
The negotiating group was quite miscellaneous. Obviously there were those who were always looking for making a good hand of their country’s troubles. But also there were some new, at first totally inapprehensible people. They neatly told about their view on the global historical process and the Russia’s special place in it. The special place is not as an exclusive role of Russians, as for instance Hebrews understand their Peculiarity. But special since any nation’s culture, its history, traditions, customs are always unrepeatable and necessary for the integral culture of the futures united humanity formation. They also had their own view on the history of Ancient Egypt, which they considered to be the cradle of the modern Western civilization. They took a particular interest in the period of religious reforms of Ehnaton, the tenth pharaoh of the eighteenth dynasty. According to their opinion this pharaoh even in his childhood got an afflatus about the monotheism, which he expressed in the famed hymns to Aten (Aton). They earnestly argued this version comparing the hymns to Aten with the Koran’s lines and showed their identity not only in the contention but also in rhythmic; and that impressed me greatly. The conflict between Ehnaton and Amon-Ra’s hierarchy is described in details at many historical monographs. But public used to think that it had been a conflict between a person and a religious clan. I’ve never met the versions about such conflicts between hierophants themselves, who really exercised the stable ruling of the Egyptian civilization at least for three millennia. Moreover, clearly thinking one can hardly imagine that a single man without the certain clan’s support could accomplish such religious upheaval as Ehnaton did. Aldo it’s naturally to suppose that a man like Ehnaton should have followers whose deeds couldn’t be unnoticed in the history. Another matter is how historians, who always work for a certain social ruling, presented their activity to the public opinion.
Russians consider Moses to be one of the first Ehnaton’s followers. He attempted to realize the ideas, which the monotheist pharaoh, who openly opposed the Amon-Ra’s hierarchy, was devoted to. But also they think that Moses’ project failed because it had been in advance inserted into the global hierophants’ project of keeping the atheism in people minds. As a result Moses was most likely killed during the first year of the “Sinai picnic”, which became the initial – the advertising stage of the enclosing project. And the temple’s slaves who had been a usual tribe of Semitic nomads before their capture and had gone (or been expatriated?) with Moses found themselves in a specific concentration camp as a result of work of the enclosing script. There during forty-two years an inhuman (in the whole meaning) experiment on them was held. And Moses is connected with it only because they arrogated its realization to him. And after, they raised him to the rank of the creator of the Judaism-the-result-of-history that substituted the true Afflatus.
As you can see the story is quite involved and it’s really hard for understanding until exceeding the bounds of the limitations set on psyche by the culture we were born and grew in. But an attempt to remove these limitations opens the certain perspective for getting out of the dead-end, where does the modern civilizations stay in.
Excuse me, Mr. Salem. What have you meant when told of the specific concentration camp and the inhuman experiment on Semitic nomads?
Mr. Holmes, have you ever been in Sinai desert?
Never.
I’m strongly recommending you, moreover our travel agencies organise special picnics there for those who rests at Charm-al-Sheikh resorts. If you had been there it would be easier to explain many things. Be sure that noting has changed for the three millennia there. Try to imagine an absolutely lifeless rocky place where not only water but meal too is the problem. And you get to there from a lived-in oasis where they gather three crops of grain, fruits and vegetables a year. Do you really think that at those far times people were more ideological that today? Probably they had more strong links with environmental nature and thus the instinct of self-preservation was less depressed. And the slavery institute wasn’t something outgoing. May be temple’s slaves lived better than others. Because these ancient nomads being the property of the zhretses cast remained the united community and could keep a connection wit their tribesmen. Honestly, I didn’t understand why the temple let such liberties to be. Any other master would avoid getting slaves from one tribe since they could connive with each other. And as for work at quarries, building temples, pyramids or other ritual structures, peasants who formally were free were got to take part in it. And now just imagine that for some chimerical ideas about the God, who promises the inapprehensible freedom, you’re driven from the organised life with children, cattle and goods into the concentration camp. Water and food supplies finish soon. New food stocks arrival is not expected, and what then follows? – A revolt of the mad crowd, which is well described in the Bible at Numbers, 14. Could they return to Egypt? They must, but… didn’t and moreover for forty-two years voluntarily continued their own tortures. In the name of what was it? Did they consciously wait while one or two generations of those who had remembered Egypt and the road there would die? No, it doesn’t happen in the life, only in myths and legends. Another deal is much more interesting. Are these myths and legends a part of some folklore or a part of totalitarian ideology, a special type of PR pursuing the anti-popular goals? That’s what I’ve meant talking of the inhuman experiment.
According to the Russian’s version, those who escaped the Sinai desert should have differed greatly from other their contemporaries on the psychological level by their particular adaptability to any changes of the external sociological environment. In other words, the hierophants in the “Sinai walking-tour” created an instrument of the futures world-domination. They did it so as to make this instrument believe in such a mission and so as to make all surrounding tribes and folks believe in the instrument’s mission. Thus the hierophants on their own created conditions for forming the myth of the "zid-masonic[62]" plot. And behind the curtain of that easy-exposable myth they being untroubled could realize the concentration of different powers and productive forces of the mankind.
By literature sources I’m acquainted with your great-grandfathers works, Mr. Holmes, and I know that he had his own view on the role of Hebrews and secret organizations, like Masonic lodges, in the History. But from the talks with the Russians I had got a new understanding of the processes of ruling, starting from which my view on the power hierarchy in the society has changed. I don’t know why the very Russians have understood that what for a long time had stared us in the face. There is a whole library of the eminent persons’ utterances about the negative role of Hebrews in the other nations’ histories from Egyptians and Romans to Russians and Germans. Were Julius Caesar, Nero, Catherine the Great, Napoleon and Churchill the fools? Or were they as all others a product of the culture, where such opinions are directly formed for hiding the highest level of the power hierarchy in the society? There is a phrase of Greek historian Plutarch, who was the zhrets of the Delphi’s Oracle at once: “You rule, but you too are ruled”. Just this phrase should have made “the ruling” circles to search for that what the Russians called “the Global Predictor”, the conceptual power based on knowledge, not on force. Your famous philosopher Beckon with his single utterance: “Knowledge is power”, which on some languages is understood in two ways[63], could encourage on looking for this hidden, and thus very effective power.
Then Salem told of that what Holmes had already heard from Verov in Spain. He told of the conceptual power, about the highest level of power hierarchy in the society, which already for many millennia not changing the contention of the conception of ruling has been providing the stability of the crowd-“elitist” pyramid. But there was something new in his words, which apparently neither Andrew nor Paolo had known of.
A conceptual power, the highest level of the power hierarchy in the society as the power institute was born by Ancient Egyptian civilization. But the “mother” didn’t survive this birth. It means that Egyptian civilization came to naught and it became a simple state. So Greeks and later Romans conquered it and after the Rome’s fall it became a part of the Islamic world. Frenchmen and Englishmen tried to make it a part of the biblical world. But probably the substantial unity of the hymns to Aten and the Koran played the main part and one can say that Ehnaton’s ideas won at least in Egypt. By the way, Mr. Holmes, have you noticed the strange repeating of some events separated by two centuries? We Egyptians haven’t forgotten how on the beginning of the 19th century Napoleon’s army occupied it self with the same thing as the “Taliban” forces in the beginning of the 21st. They shot the ancient cultural monuments with the field guns. The mark of the French terrorists is at the ancients Sphinx’ face. They failed to destroy it completely only because it the Napoleon’s times there were not missiles used by the talibs for Buddha’s monument demolishing. How do you think, what can connect these two events?
I think that the same clans, purposing the same aims, financed them. The mankind loses its consciousness after having lost its cultural heritage, – answered Holmes.
It’s the most probable, – agreed Salem and opened the picnics already familiar to Holmes. – As you see, Mr. Holmes, the origins of the Russian, and hence the global, puzzle belongs to the Egyptian civilization. And it’s not accidentally that the authors placed 22 hierophants on the first picture of the “Historical Picnic” and the television of the August Putsch’s times is called after the XVIII dynasty. Though there really were not any confrontation between Ehnaton and Tutanhamon, since Tutanhaton (it was his name in the beginning of his ruling) became the pharaoh three years after Ehnaton’s death and for some time tried to follow his father-in-law’s strategy. But later the zhretses of Amon-Ra made him leave the new capital Akhetaton and change his name on Tutanhamon. But all of this wasn’t too essential, because in Egypt the real power, under which primarily the property inheritance was understood, was transferred through women’s line. That’s why many pharaohs’ daughters’ husbands became the pharaohs automatically. More important is that there also was the power of ideas that not always could be handed down. That’s why it’s easy to trace the power of ideas during the global historical process, but it’s extremely hard to trace the power of property, which at first glance caused all the wars. Here, as you can see, it’s told of the four millennia struggle of two party religions of Aten and Amon (Amen). Seemingly these ideas were worthy of it since they have founded their followers for forty centuries. And the Russians are in the certain way right when they connected the events occurring in their country with the worldview split in the Ancient Egyptian society. I thought and assured that nearly all pictures from the first “picnic” had been taken from the monographs of Maspero, Mattier and Breasted. But the Russians interpreted those symbols of our ancient culture in their own way. Moreover they attach great importance to the process of symbols interpretation and call it with the strange term unable to translate on other languages.
Salem took a sheet of paper and showed the two words written in English – “tihaya sapa”. Then he continued his story.
When I asked them to explain the meaning of this term, they at first told that these words came from the field engineering: so in the past was called an undermining of enemies positions where explosives were set and after suddenly detonated. But seeing the perplexity at my face they began to explain how the matrix methods of ruling work. They think that hierophants were proficient in them more than any other. That time I understood next to nothing from their story because they used some new terminology. But after the film “Matrix” something became clear, for me at least. In their story it was told of the Universe as of the process of the triunity[64] of information, measure and matter. So they called the primary philosophical categories, which the hierophants’ worldview was founded on. I’ve already told you, Holmes, that I had studied the modern philosophy at Cambridge. But that, what I’ve heard from the Russians, was exceeding the borders of all studied in England under the direction of your professors. I failed to rely on knowledge got during my independent lessons.
With all this the Russians rather convincingly with the examples taken from a life showed me, that the European public philosophy makes everybody, who deals with it at the first time, to choose: either materialism or idealism – there isn’t another choice. As it happens there is. And this third alternative is defined by the objective measure of being. Moreover they showed that using the symbiosis of the Russian Tradition and the Koran knowledge one can understand the objectivity of the categories of information and measure. “There is no thing without its image” – does the Russian proverb say. “Allah created all things and measured it” – is said in Koran. You, Holmes, would probably ask me what it was for – maintaining the oscillation of the public mind from materialism to idealism and back. I discussed this question with the Russians and they answered me, that there always were two systems of knowledge about the world and hence two educational system. The first was for wide masses; the second was for the small circle, which had chosen the mission to rule.
Historically it’s traced in all cultures types, the educational systems of which we are familiar to. Already in Ancient Egypt the education for officials and for lesser clerical casts differed greatly from what the small chosen circle that formed the highest znakharstvo and pharaohs’ court were let to. In Ancient Mesopotamia one can see the same difference. In Ancient Judea the knowledge for people (Torah, Talmud and chronicles) also differed greatly from Levites’ knowledge. Finally the Christian church during its domination over the minds of Middle-Aged Europe also had one true for people and regular clergy and another one for the initiated.
But if to ask one what did Levites, who had inherited the culture and knowledge of Ancient Egyptian highest “zhrechestvo” (they were zhretses some time), knew and understood? And what didn’t others understood, even probably knowing it? Then one can find an answer in the occult literature.
Salem took a thick folio with big letters on its cover: “The Sacred Book of Thoth. The Major Arcana of Tarot” – opened a page marked with gilded rope and read:
“With thirty two ways – wonderful, wise – inscribed (designed) IA, IEBE, Sabaoph, God of Israel, God Alive and the Eternal King, El Shadday, Merciful and Forgiving, Sublime and Staying in Eternity, – sublime and holy is His Name, – created His world with three sipherims: Sephar, Sipur and Sipher.
The first of these terms (Sephar) should mean the numbers, which only give us a possibility to determine necessary purposes and relations of each and a thing for understanding the goal, which it was created for; and MEASURE of length, and MEASURE of capacity, and MEASURE of weight, motion and harmony – ALL THESE THINGS ARE RULED BY NUMBERS. The second term (SIPUR) expresses word and voice, because it the God’s Word and Voice, because it is the God’s Word, it is the Voice of God Alive, Who gave birth to creatures under their different FORMS, either external or internal; it should be mentioned in these words: “God said: «Be the Light» and «the Light became»”. Finally, the third term (Sipher) means the writing. The Writing of God is the PRODUCT OF CREATION. God’s Words are His Writing; God’s Thought is the Word. Thus thought, word and writing are the one in God; while in a man they are three (put in capitals by the authors when citing)”[65].
As you see, Holmes, many people like me read this text. But it’s dead without the corresponding explanation. It means that it excludes the uniqueness of its understanding by the majority of arbitrary true seekers out of the devotion system.
And the Russians consider this inability of understanding because of intentional expression of mutual exclusive meanings ambiguity to be the main peculiarity of the education for “the small circle, which mission is to rule”, and precisely: for the small circle that pretends to dominate completely and unpunished.
But nonetheless under the “God’s Writing” (product of God’s creation) one can recognize the matter in all its forms, under the “God’s Thought” – the objective information, the life’s sense, and under the “God’s Word” – the measure. And all of this forms the triunity of matter-information-measure in the Universe. Thus it goes that the philosophy based on the triunity of matter-information-measure really existed for a historically long time. And relying on it somebody swung the public mind from “idealism” to “materialism” and back like a pendulum and didn’t let it stop and think over the question: “What is the Truth?”
However the Russians consider that all cited from “The Sacred Book of Thoth” are just retellings, but not the basis of the true worldview of the triunity of matter-information-measure that in the biblical civilization isn’t intended for expressing in the public philosophy. As for the Koran, they think that the worldview nearest to the worldview of Triunity is given in it. This worldview underlay the philosophy usurped during the “Sinai picnic” by biblical “esotericists” who had patronized historically real Moses. I was to agree with their argumentation since there is direct indication in Koran: “And when We gave Musa[66] the Book and the distinction that you might walk aright” (Sura 2:50)[67].
From this ajat one can understand that Moses get some knowledge gathered into the Writing (true Torah, later made disused and substituted for the redaction perverted by the biblical project curators). And also something called “Distinction” was given to him.
What is called the “Distinction” in the Koran, after Moses’ elimination was simply hidden from the crowd and usurped for internal use by the supreme hierarchs of the biblical “esotericists”. I wouldn’t like to discuss the problem of Distinction today. It should be a topic for special big discussion. I can only refer to the Koran texts where the problem of Distinction arises more than once[68]. Reading the Koran’s ajats you will find the word “Furkan” translated on other languages either “Distinction” or “Salvation”. Thus you will be able to find two conceptual levels, this word points out.
With all this at first conceptual level the question will arise about what exactly is given in the Koran for the Distinction as the primary conceptual categories, from which should one develop his or her process of Life’s understanding and re-understanding. And at the second conceptual level you will be to solve the question of your ability to Discern “this” from “not this”, “one” from “another” in the flow of Life’s events.
Together with the Russians we have thoroughly studied the Suras where it is told of the Distinction. And I’ve understood that in the Koran the doctrine of triunity of matter-information-measure – the limit generalizations and the primary differences in the Universe – is openly expressed. This worldview is for everybody, not only for “esotericists’ elite”. Moreover opened for people during the last thirteen centuries it could be the stable basis for developing the philosophy, which will be alternative to one that maintains the public mind’s oscillation from materialism to idealism and back. However, the public philosophy nowadays is still expressing the defective worldview that is more corresponding to pharaohs’ times.
How do you think, Mr. Salem, why could it be possible? –Holmes asked.
I asked the same. As the answer the Russian showed me the “Book for Elementary Reading” by Vodovozov, published in St-Petersburg in the end of 19th century and used for the Russian Empire nationals’ self-education. The matter concerns ancient Egyptians’ views on the objective reality. I’ve made an extract. I hope it would slightly open you the secret of maintaining the biblical worldview stereotypes stability.
Holmes took the paper and absorbed in reading the English text.
“The main cast that ruled everything was the cast of clerics or zhretses. They directed even the tsar (i.e. pharaoh) how to live and what to do… The supreme divinity of Egyptians was AMON. Four divinities united in him. The substance, which everything in the world consists of, – goddess NET; the spirit enlivening the substance or the force making it be composed, change and act – god NEPH; the endless space occupied by the substance – goddess PASHT; the endless time, which we imagine during the constant changes of the substance – god SEBEK. Everything in the Universe according to Egyptian doctrine origins from the substance via the action of invisible force, occupies the space and changes with time. And all of this mystically combines in the tetraune[69] being AMON”.
Holmes finished reading and for some time silently looked at the landscape behind the window. It began to darken, quickly as always in these latitudes. Salem suggested going outside. Freshness of the near water was felt in the air. They entered the wide terrace buried in verdure and descending to Nile. The first stars appeared on the unfamiliar skies. In a comfortable gazebo, which too was decorated with garlands of rambling rose, the table with refined engraved silver dishes with fruits and sweets was served. Hot coffeepot made of Dresden Meissen china exhaled the aroma of the just made coffee. Salem invited Holmes to the gazebo and their conversation continued under the sky of Cairo.
As you see, Mr. Holmes, if we put aside the names of Ancient Egyptian gods, the substance will correspond to the modern “substance”; spirit – mostly to “force fields”; and “space” and “time” will remain unchanged from that time. That what Vodovozov told about Ancient Egypt shows, that the primary differences and generalizing categories taken as basic categories of the Universe in the modern civilization during the millennia remains unchanged. “Matter” understood as “substance”; “spirit” understood as “energy”, “force” and the ruling law, i.e. “information” and “measure”; and also “space” and “time” sometimes divided and sometimes united first in four-person Amon, then in “two-person” unnamed “space-time continuum” from theory of relativity, which is the unknowable container of the matter in any aggregative state.
And though, if to describe in details the word, meaning this primary differences, and interpretations of concepts connected with it changed many times during the Western civilization history, the one remained unchanged. “Information” was secretly hidden and unable to be separated among the primary differences from “spirit”, “energy” and “force”, which were equated in the Western worldview.
As for “matter”, it was equated to “substance”. And when working out in detail, divided into four elements or on the modern science language – states of aggregation of matter: “Earth” – solid substance; “Water” – liquid matter; “Air” – gaseous matter; “Fire” – plasma. And the natural force fields, which carry ordered energy and are invisible for the majority of people, merged with the information in the “non-material spirit”. What concerns the vacuum, which according to the modern ideas is far from the emptiness but is one of the states of aggregation of matter, it became “space-container”. And “time” turned into some sigh to indicate some impalpable incomprehensibility. In other words, everybody knows what the time is, but nobody can say something definite about it.
How does the historical experience show, during the history of after-Egyptian regional civilizations the worldview based on the four-person Universe remains itself. It only changed its forms of appearing before the society. And this worldview had done the way from the theological doctrine of ancient Egyptians about four-person Amon to the space-time continuum of the 20th century materialists. And the regional civilization, where it dominated the people’s minds, led the planet to the global biospherical-ecological crisis, in which the intrasocial crisis had been reflected.
But for all that one finds that some ideas obvious inside the worldview of triunity just become imperceptible, incomprehensible and indescribable within the categories of the four-personal Universe by the “languages” developed in culture.
Thus after conversations with the Russians and reading the attendant literature it became clear to me, that the categories of space and time are secondary concerning the measure. And so, time is simply a ratio measure of full oscillation periods of all the mutually enclosed processes in the Universe. Probably it became clear to me because the image of the mutually enclosing has existed in Russia and Egypt among their cultural heritage from the old times. For instance world-famous Russian doll “matreshka[70]” and pharaohs’ sarcophaguses one can see in the Cairo museum are the same constructions as they are. They differ only by size and purpose. If one has no measure he won’t be able to distinguish an enclosed construction from the enclosing one. That’s why during the history they only told about the space, but really measured it with subjectively chosen etalons.
Excuse me, Holmes, I seem to be carried away by new philosophical theories and probably have tired you. But thanks to them I was able to penetrate into the secret of Russian “picnics” and to understand how matrix methods of ruling work. It would be simpler to me to indicate the information, which these pictures contains; to refer the certain words, which are the code – the measure; and to show the defined result, which becomes a natural consequence of the objective process of the Universe – the triunity of matter-information-measure. But you understand, that without such wordy philosophical introductions my words would remain another hypothesis, which the press after September 11 is full of. May be my statement was somehow confused, but it was the first time I tried to retell and expound coherently that, what I used to reflect on when I was alone with my thoughts.
I beg you, Mr. Salem. You should not apologize. I listened to your story rich in new terminology very attentively, and it was quite useful for me, I assure you. Point is that I’ve heard some odds and ends, single theses, fragments of the new philosophy being born in Russia at different places and under different circumstances. Russia as the civilization has its own mission. And I wanted to understand it for a long time. We used to talk of civilization within the terminology East-West or North-South. Hearing you I tried to abstract my mind from biblical culture stereotypes, i.e. to overstep the limits of binary code: materialism-idealism, capitalism-socialism, plan-market, East-West and so on. Within the worldview alternative to the binary one (as I’d like to call it) Russia for me seems to be the civilization of measure; and the West directed on unlimited consumption of material comforts is the civilization of matter; as for the East closed on spirit practices created by “esotericists” for the crowd-“elitism” stability maintaining, it is the civilization of information.
But I’ve told of the worldview of triunity as of an alternative to the worldview of four-person Amon, – Salem tried to object.
It’s right, but in part. You told of the energy as of some stable transition state of matter when it changes its aggregation state. Moreover, in your discussions the matter concerned the space-time continuum. That’s why the quadruple matter-energy-space-time could be divided into two pairs: matter-energy and space-time. And I consider the conversion from plain alternativeless binary to the worldview of triunity, which it encloses, to be a step forward because we are still living in the three-dimension space. In addition, in very Cairo I’ve heard the logical and coherent account of the worldview, which the matrix methods of ruling are based on, as it seems to me. I avoid the term “weapon” expressly, since many people, met with the matrix methods of ruling, would try to add the adjective “matrix” with the noun “weapon”, taken from the biblical culture, and drag it into the 21st century. But if to examine the process of ruling from the position of mutual enclosing of matrixes then the mankind has a chance to stop all the wars. It needs that these methods become a common property not just of the “elite”, but of everybody, who wishes to increase his measure of righteousness of understanding the general current of events. In this case, when some conflict appears, a manager proficient in the matrix methods will need simply achieving a higher level of understanding the general current of events and solving out the conflict from a position of enclosing matrix.
But if it would be more profitable for him to aggravate the coming conflict, well, to cause a clash between the enemies for achieving the desired result? – Salem tried to object again.
It would be unrighteousness from his side. And the day will come when he wishes he hadn’t done it. One should remember of the mutual enclosing of matrixes, which in the limit go to the matrix of God’s Predetermination. Such actions or evil thoughts will return to the aggressor, since they could not be dictated by the higher measure of understanding the general current of events. Quite the contrary his aggressive intentions, whatever he thinks of them himself, will objectively mean that he had gone down an enclosed matrix instead of rising his measure of understanding to the level of enclosing matrix. And it seems to me, that all what his happening with the USA, or precisely with their government, demonstrates just the same algorithm of the matrix ruling. And I’m thankful to you, Mr. Salem, because I needed your account for understanding of some details, linking the matrix methods of ruling with the two worldviews. Surely, I haven’t understood everything. Something has left because of many translations from language to language, but I seem to have caught the main. The Most High controls this weapon, in the sense that its use for the sake of some clan is rather dangerous for this clan. Since the weapon possesses the reflexive ability, which is known as an effect of “monkey’s paw” to the Western civilization. And the Russian “picnics”, which were the matrix-scripts of the possible variants of events development in Russia, demonstrates us this effect.
