Текст книги "The Last Gambit"
Автор книги: (IP of the USSR) Internal Predictor of the USSR
сообщить о нарушении
Текущая страница: 18 (всего у книги 21 страниц)
It seems like the Conception of Social Securitytoo assembles the creative potential of peoples for leading not only Russia but also even global civilization in whole out of the crisis. Therefore the epic name of the conception – “Dead Water” – was predetermined long time before Pushkin has wrote it, and, consequently, the “faro” game was lost by biblical znakharstvo before they had started playing it on the matrix level with Internal Predictor of the USSR in the “Historical Picnic”. Even the appeal to the authority of their “alma mater” – ancient Egypt – hasn’t helped them. They tried to break the matrix of alternative conception in the “Post Historical Picnic” using the same authority.
Do you mean, Holmes, the figure of UgOMON above the Pisa Tower in the third “picnic”?
Yes, Watson, this figure of sitting Pharaoh symbolizes the matrix links between the first and the third “picnics”, but to the right and above all these pictures there’s Eros or Cupid, in any case – the symbol of god of Love. But true God is Love indeed; and that’s why on the level of the third “picnic” symbols the representatives of biblical znakharstvo assumed (involuntary or not), that in mutual enclosing of all matrixes there is the matrix of God’s Predetermination, and that everything will happen according to it, sooner or later. And nevertheless, if to try to translate the message of Global Predictor to Internal Predictor of the USSR from the language of symbols into the language of definite lexicon, it will mean approximately the following: “What are you trying to do? Don’t you understand that you’re trying to withstand the authority of the conception, which serves the base of stable managing of the global civilization for more than 4000 years? We have Sufism, Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, Masonry and countless number of different open and secret order structures – and everything in one bottle. And what can you oppose to that? The Sufficiently Universal Theory of Ruling?”
Excuse me, Holmes, for interrupting you, but I’ve heard about the Sufficiently Universal Theory of Ruling from Galba in the bar of “Woldorf”. He spoke about it in rather irritable tone, and I didn’t ask him questions about its content. It seems to me, that you have known something very important from the conversations with Mr. Verov, which wasn’t reflected in your recordings. You’ve posed it as main argument against symbolic challenge of Global Predictor, haven’t you?
I’ve never read, Watson, the Sufficiently Universal Theory of Ruling, but indeed I’ve learnt several things about it from Mr. Verov. In Russian it’s called by abbreviation DOTU.
To their opinion, it appears as an answer to new informational state of society after the change of social behaviour logic. The split of the society has global character today. There’s no understanding between representatives of science and religion, and even between representatives of different applied and fundamental sciences. Russians asked themselves: why could it happen? – And they came to very simple conclusion, which seemed to lie on the surface: there’s no conceptual and terminological system uniting all separate branches of knowledge. If there were such a system, then experts in different branches of knowledge would understand each other easily. And they tried to comprehend the characteristic features of people’s behaviour when they encounter any processes touching their living in their practical activity. And these common features are – the possibility to describe any process as a process of managing and people’s striving for managing the processes important for their living and living of the mankind.
That’s why they considered conceptual and terminological system of the Sufficiently Universal Theory of Ruling to be the most acceptable for solving any problems of the mankind: religious, social, technical and technological, biological, military, economic, personal and psychological and others.
Thus, for example, from their point of view all western economy scientific elite is a collection of idiots and swindlers, because they know nothing about the essential metrological expression of mistakes in ruling macro-economical systems, and what should be in the list of guaranteed essential goals of ruling macro-economy, being achieved metrologically. Do you agree, that every objective science starts with measurements, and all its concepts and terms accord to them? If there’s no such beginning, this is not science, but charlatanism and primordial “bewitching of elements”. And in our days it’s more often the swindling, hidden by the schools of “economy thought”.
But, excuse me, Holmes, there’s nothing new in it, I’ve read many articles on this theme in different special editions.
It’s true, Watson, but the question is not in theories of ruling since they are truly numerous and applied to different spheres of human activity, including economy. The matter is in the Sufficiently Universal Theory of Ruling itself – in rendering its content such way, that nobody in any case could turn it into a dead and dreadful dogma. This task isn’t as easy as it seems for the first look, Watson, isn’t it? In other words, it was necessary to create such conceptual and terminological system in the framework of this theory, with the help of which the expert in related science could go in for any fundamental and applied science, and which could unit science and religion, if they have the same mission – to serve for the good of mankind.
And how do you think, Holmes, have Russians succeeded in it?
I suppose, Watson, they have, if even you and I are occupied with this theory today. And it has one important idea referred to the vector of aims and the vector of deviation of ruling reversibility and to the re-evaluation of a negative feedback to a positive one and vice versa according to the chosen vector of aims. From the worldview positions of DOTU one can understand the following. Any contradictions and conflicts in society, which are insolvable within some historically formed limited conception of the social self-ruling, are seen in another way and can be solved without conflicts within the enclosing conception of ruling that is wider and fuller.
Some possibilities of conflicts solving and overcoming are connected with the property of mutual reversing in the pair of vector of aims – vector of deviation[114]. That what is the vector of aims within one conception becomes the vector of deviation within another one, though the vector of state remains unchanged; and vice versa. And now let’s return to the third “picnic”.
Yes, Holmes, it seems to me that we will seriously need to occupy ourselves with the questions of the Sufficiently Universal Theory of Ruling. But now I have some questions concerning the third picnic.
Yes, Watson, please.
Firstly, I can’t understand the meaning of this “duckling with the guitar” to the right of Pisa tower.
Watson, it seems to me that such way the biblical znakharstvo represents the period of idealistic atheism, which followed the period of materialistic atheism…
And which finished with the operation of liquidation of Trotsky, devoted to materialistic atheism? – I interrupted Holmes.
You’re right, Watson. This operation had a code name “Duck”, and I noticed it in my recordings, as I remember.
Excuse me, Holmes, I didn’t attach significance to it, or I could link it with the symbols of the third “picnic” by myself. Also I don’t know, what the sense of the dotted line is, going from the “White House” and returning to it. But after I’ve read your recordings, I came to the conclusion that it may mean the U-turn of the matrix-scenario, Galba told me about it on October 4.
Apparently, it’s true, Watson. And your investigation of “Antiquity vocabulary” concerning with two group sculptures – “Theseus and Minotaur” and “Murderers of a Tyrant” – completed the whole picture of the algorithm of returning of the catastrophe matrix towards its creators. The first figure composition on the background of dotted line loop can be called “Russian wrestling” (and it can be no way in “Antiquity vocabulary”). It was very popular in the beginning of 20th century and wrestlers met in circuses, as a rule. And that’s why two compositions – “Russian wrestling” and “Theseus and Minotaur” – are the symbols of two putsches in Russia – August, 1991 and October, 1993, after which in the post Soviet society really started the “Exchange of points of view”; and “Very revolutionary forces” – “Tyrant-murderers” (kamikaze-terrorists) – fall the America’s lot.
And what can be the meaning of the loop on the map in the place of “Russian wrestling”?
You, Watson, may row in the University eight, but you’re still far from sea affairs, and that’s why this loop says nothing to you. But I’ve been interested since my childhood in yachting, yachts and everything linked with aesthetic and romance of sailing. And I can comment this loop as following. When a sailing vessel manoeuvres, sometimes the circumstances are such, that the wearing may be dangerous in one of the phases, when the wind is blowing from the stern, because of the risk of nearly instant transfer of sails and movable part of masts and spars[115] from one board to another, which may lead to damages of yacht, to traumas and deaths of careless crewmembers. In this case for changing the course of the vessel the turn “overstag” is used instead of wearing, and in one of the phases of this turn the wind blows from the bow along the ship. In this case the whoop transfers the sails from one board to another smoothly, without the risk to hurt or kill someone of crewmembers, to damage the sails, rigging and masts and spars. Such “turn overstag”, which is made instead of wearing, got the nick on the slang of yachtsmen – “cow overstag”, because of its clumsiness and inner ill-coordination within the crew, which isn’t able to make the turn wearing.
For example, if such crew needs to make the turn to the right on 90 degrees, it will turn to the left on 270 degrees, making the “cow overstag” instead of swift wearing. When you follow the yacht race from the helicopter, you will notice, that the yacht making the “cow overstag” moves by loop-like trajectory. But if you know nothing about the fine points of yacht managing in hard weather conditions or within ill-coordinated crew, this manoeuvre will remain incomprehensible to you. Russia seems to make such “cow overstag”: the turn seemed to be “left” – perestroika, democratising; but the farther this turn goes, the more questions the supporters of “left trend” in policy have: “Russia, where are you going? – We don’t understand…”
And Russian newspaper “Komsomolskaya Pravda” on the October 18, 1990, almost a year before the putsch, represent something similar in this very sense – political:
Essentially, Watson, the manoeuvre “cow overstag” is represented nearby “Russian wrestling” and is connected with the effect of “monkey’s paw”; its symbol we can see among other pictures of the “Post Historical Picnic” and you was told about it by Galba in “Woldorf” bar.
But the newspaper “Chas Pick” №21 (73) on the June 2, 1999, with the photo-collage under the article “About Harm and Use of Mythology”, that you had brought from India, has shown how the catastrophe matrix, directed against Russia originally, transformed and turned against USA. The monument of Peter I, the founder of St-Petersburg, – “Bronze Horseman” – on the background of New York sky-scrapers; St. Isaac’s Cathedral, reflected in the windows of one of them – all this symbolizes this turn of algorithmic course of matrix processes to USA.
It is very interesting to follow the connections between these collages-illustrations to the article “About Harm and Use of Mythology” with the “picnics”. Look: here, in the lowest running head of the newspaper, under the article, there’s a picture of Petersburg panorama, but on the place, where usually the dome of St. Isaac’s Cathedral is seen, there appeared towers of New York World Trading Centre:
On St-Petersburg plan in the “Post Historical Picnic” on the same place there’s a picture of “Indian militant elephant” with the signature “The place of the most important meetings”. In other words, the heirs of NSC-20/1 Directive of August 18, 1948 – have played their game to the end: he who digs a pit for others may fall himself therein.
You’re absolutely right, Watson, all the more, that the number of the news-paper – 21 – is the “point”, several times and in different modifications appearing on the picture in the 1994 calendar, on the picture with someone feeding birds on the embankment. And serial number – 73 – shows that two stages
of matrix algorithm have been completed and the third is on the threshold. It’s worth mentioning, that Hermann in “The Queen of spades” was striving to get the sum of 21, but got 13. And in addition, if to look on Petersburg map in mirror reflection, we will have the schematic map, resembling strongly the map of New York; but instead of Hudson River mouth we will have the Finnish Bay, called “Swan Lake” here somehow, and the Neva River, called “The River of Moscow”, may be analogically with famous cliché “the hand of Moscow”. By the way, New York was originally called “New Amsterdam” by its founders, Dutchmen, and St-Petersburg was called “New Amsterdam” too, in times of Peter the Great, because he built St-Petersburg imitating the architecture of Dutch seaside cities.
And that’s why everything happened according to catastrophe matrix, fed by biblical znakharstvo, but not with respect to Russia, but with respect to those who developed this cannibalistic USA NSC-20/1 Directive of August 18, 1948. Notice the number of the directive, Watson, it demonstrates, that its developers were limited by Pushkin’s matrix of “Queen of Spades” in their plans from the very beginning. Yes, the planes did what they were supposed to do sharply in time indicated in the third “picnic”, but they have ruined not the symbols of spiritual and secular power of Russia, but two towers of World Trading Centre – the symbol of biblical civilization. And then everything was like in Hollywood films: rescuers with helmets and respirators, piles of dust and frames of ruined buildings, resembling Pisa tower by their appearance. All this you can see on the pictures of the “Post Historical Picnic”, Watson.
And what can mean the word “trace”, written by hand under the slogan “Very revolutionary forces”?
You have answered this question by yourself, Watson, when you gave the assessment of New York events four days before the catastrophe – September 7 – in your notes. You have found the “Iran trace”, which might precede the events of “black Tuesday”. Now shocked world public considers terrorist acts in New York and Washington to be ideal by organization and completing. They a priori assert that everything planned was done completely. Of course, it’s not so, and the forth plane, fallen on cornfield, can serve the proof.
It’s beyond any doubts, that there’s some difference, unknown to us, in sophisticated plan of terrorist operation, from one side, and its realization in practice, from the other side. It would be appropriate to suggest, (theist sign is the “nuclear mushroom” in the “Defence Picnic”), that the fallen (or shot down) plane was trying to achieve the nuclear object; and the declaration, prepared in advance, allegedly on behalf of “Japanese Red Army” would connect this unsuccessful terrorist act with revenge for atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, if the operation would be realized successfully. And in that case USA together with, probably, the half of the globe would now withstand the results of radioactive pollution…
There may be some more unrealised points of terrorist act, which has been planned and prepared for several years, by expert’s opinions. If these points have been realized, the world history could go another way. For understanding the essence of what had happened, it would be useful to know what hadn’t happened. And we have much to think about here, Watson.
In your notes you’ve paid your attention to coincidence of numerical measure of the date, when the Iran plane hasn’t fallen down on London, – 7, with number of passengers on its board – 430; and you suggested, that this case is an unsuccessful hijacking of the liner, which could be directed to London. Islam terrorist, or those who stood behind them, could have developed such plan indeed. Thus, for example, it’s wide known, that Algerian terrorists yet in 1994 were going to drive an aero bus down to Paris, and then only the activity of French intelligence helped to prevent this act. Also it’s known, that 6 years ago the project of hijacking of several American passenger planes in order to attack the building of CIA and other American objects of greatest importance was found in the computer of someone named Abdul Murada, arrested in Manila, who was the participant of famous terrorist act in WTC in 1993.
And now try to imagine, what could have happened if this terrorist act had taken place indeed. So, on September 7 the Iran plane is falling down, for example, on Westminster Abbey, and destroys in addition the tower-symbol of good old England – Big Ben. Even if there have been no declarations about responsibility, the terrorists would have been indicated as Iranians at once (the plane, I remind you, belonged to the company “Iran Air”). And the same time, as we’ve got to know recently, some Iranian, jailed in Germany, makes a fuss with administration of the jail, requiring making a call to the White House. He wants to warn about terrorist acts in New York and Washington. We can suggest, that he has a certain task – to make a fuss over information about a plot against USA, allegedly famous to him, and even if he speaks nothing about “Iran trace”, being an Iranian, he is “Iran trace” himself.
While our compatriots rake the piles aside and count people killed on September 7, the planned terrorist acts take place on September 11 in New York, Washington and, perhaps, in some other city of USA.
I doubt that Americans would have closed their air zone for the period between 7th and 11th of September and would have abolished all domestic flights; the real events of September11 have shown that USA considered them invulnerable and expected danger not from those sides, where they really came from. And what happens in Europe for many years, including destroying terrorist acts and military operations, not only don’t touch them, or, more exactly, didn’t touch, but they themselves never cared about that. Even in USA NSC-20/1 Directive of August 18, 1948, which I’ve mentioned already, and which describes the complex of measures in USA policy, aimed to destroy USSR from inside, they declared, that they bear no moral responsibility for calamities of Russia, if they will take place.
Notice the fact that the terrorists in one of the planes tied not green, but red ribbons around their heads (one of passengers reported about it by his mobile phone). Red colour is significant for Shiites (Iranians, as well as members of organizations under their control are Shiites), and it symbolizes the blood of martyrs Hasan and Hussein (the second and the third of Shiite imams). Frankly speaking, the same colour is important for Trotskyites too, including left in Arabian countries.
Now let’s try to imagine the reaction of USA in the case, when clear “Iran trace” is found.
Nothing to think about, – reacted I, – USA would inflict a crippling blow to Iran as “state-outcast”. I remember that exactly after the attacks of September 11 Iran was called the first candidate for retribution. But speaking the truth, some time later Americans started to call some other countries too.
You’re right, Watson, but, as you understand, in the case of quick and crippling blow to Iran the world would have turned to witness the other history of humankind, and that will never happen, thanks Lord. The role of Afghanistan in this never-have-been history can be discovered, and it will differ from what we have today. Since Pakistan and Saudi Arabia together with USA were involved in creating talibs, it can’t excluded, that they would join USA at once in destroying the bases of international terrorism, because in that case their enemy – Iran – would be appointed as its source.
There may be only one reason of such attitude to Iran, after everything you’ve known about Trotskyites of every kind. Islam revolution in Iran came to such stage, that the question of its further development could be posed as following: will it come to nothing, and as a result of it Iran will resemble bourgeois-democratic Turkey? Will the Trotskyite wing win, hiding under Muslim doctrine? Or will the Iran society awake the ideals of Mohammad within itself, and will start developing, realizing them in practice?
That’s why Trotskyites, as well as bourgeois democrats, are willing to make every effort for turning this uncertain situation in their favour, misusing the fact, that few understand this in Iran itself. And that’s why USA and other Western countries protest so much against collaboration between Russia and Iran.
If Iran has become the victim of retribution action, Northern Alliance in Afghanistan, supported by Russia, would have got it too. Also it’s worth mentioning, that two days before the “terrorist act of the century” the authoritative leader of Northern Alliance, Ahmad Shah Masud, was mortally wounded, and after that “Taliban” could have been declared the only real power, able to defend stability in Afghanistan and the whole region from “Iran terrorists”.
So, much is fallen to mention that the events of the beginning of September were not the full realization of the plan. And this might happen because of some specific features of this complex operation; the participants were uncoordinated, they knew nothing about the tasks and even about existence of other branches of the script and its executors. That means, that everyone made his own part of the work, but in this case it was impossible to make the terrorists stop, if something went wrong (for example, the “Iranian terrorist act” wasn’t committed in London), not revealing some part or the whole combination. Someone should kill Masud, someone should call to the white House, and another one should attack WTC, and so on. But the unsuccessful discovery of false “Iran trace” has made something like alibi for Iran.
USA made a pause. It was impossible to discover two false traces (for example, one “Iran” and one “Bin Ladin”); and FBI has got (they couldn’t help it) real documents, proving that some other terrorists (not Iranian and not Afghan) took part in the organization of terrorist acts. These documents could have stayed unclaimed, if USA and Great Britain (and perhaps other NATO countries) have been ironing the territory of Iran instead of Afghanistan by their “tomahawks”. But it would have been World War III, and it is not here only thanks to some unknown Iranian security officer, who was vigilant and didn’t let passengers come into the pilot’s cabin. Yes, Watson, may be, sometime later the world would establish monument to him.
After little pause Holmes offered to return to the newspaper “Izvestiya”, which he picked up in Zurich airport.
Look on the number of the newspaper “Chas Pick” with the “Post Historical Picnic”, Watson.
The number of 1992 is 33.
And the serial number from the beginning of newspaper’s registration?
130! I seem to understand, Holmes. The representatives of biblical znakharstvo were trying to appeal to the highest degrees of Mason consecration – 33, and got into the enclosing matrix of “Queen of Spades” at once, and in addition – into the Hermann’s variant, when the sum of his pips after three days of game was 13.
Yes, Watson, they were doomed to absolute defeat on the matrix level, in spite of all cabbalistic tricks of the third “picnic”. Notice the date when the newspaper was published and remember the epilogue of “Queen of Spades” one more time.
Holmes took the sheet of paper with his notes and read: “Hermann went out of his mind, and he sits now confined in room Number 17 of the Obuhov Hospital. He never answers any questions, but he constantly mutters with unusual rapidity: “Three, seven, ace! Three, seven, queen!..”
And still I can’t understand, Holmes, who could select such cabbalistic numbers, that when common people encounter with this phenomenon, they feel that this …
…is either the manifestation of incomprehensible God’s Providence, or the trace of someone’s devilishly perverted mind, – Holmes ended my phrase.
Yes, Holmes, I’ve told such words really on the first day of our discussion about “picnics”, although then they were dealt with numerical mystics of planes-kamikaze. But know I met it once more, studying “picnics”, and I can’t say that it became more comprehensible to me.
But, Watson, besides it, we were talking about numerical measure, which we should work on. The mystics of numbers in New York and Washington events of September11 and the mystics of numbers in “picnics” have something in common, uniting them, and it can be called the matrix numerical measure. Chronology is the numerical measure of history; in the same way matrixes have their own numerical measure, and it is much larger by informational content than chronological numerical measure. It is the matrix numerical measure that is considered and described by cabbalists and mystics as cabbalism and mysticism of numbers. But there’s no mysticism for those who understand the nature of the phenomenon. And such person, who consider matrixes as objective thing, he not only understands the role of numerical measure in nature of matrixes, but studies to use the numerical measure for practical goals.
I would be very grateful to you, Holmes, if you gave something like practical lesson to me on the theme “Matrixes and their numerical measures”.
Dear Watson, I has been diving such practical lesson to you from the first minutes of my returning from India, and I must say that I’ve prepared to it properly.
What do you mean, Holmes?
Your reaction to the Russian newspaper “Izvestiya”.
Holmes took “Izvestiya” №175 (26013) of September 22 from the table.
I had a look on this newspaper in my spare time; I looked through all other pictures of this 12-pages newspaper and came to the conclusion that almost all of them are connected with symbolism of the “picnics”, besides the photo of Anna Kurnikova, which resembles Aphrodite Callipyga from the third “picnic” by the foreshortening indeed. I think that texts of the articles and titles can also help us in finding the answer to the Russian rebus. Watson, but what concerns the numerical measure, you have discovered it by yourself in the coincidence of the newspaper number and number of the flight, which attacked the northern tower of WTC. But now, Watson, look at the serial number of the paper. What do you see?
The number 13.
Correct, Watson. And if to add to this, that the sum of numbers in 175 is 13, we will come to the conclusion, that editorial staff of this newspaper from September 22 (11 days after the catastrophe), re-translated unconsciously some reaction of biblical aggregor to the “picnic” matrix reconstruction, which you’ve noticed too. But at the same time this collective was under influence of “Queen of Spades” matrix, that part of it, which reflected Hermann’s activity. Don’t forget, that 22 is a number of hierophants. But let’s look through the titles of articles and “pictures” to them at first. For example, there’s the picture of fisherman with spinning on the third page. Watson, translate the title of the article, please.
“Fish has become much cleverer by the championship of fishing by spinning”. I don’t quite understand, Holmes, why are interested in this article?
Look at the third “picnic”, Watson, here’s the dead fish in the “Swan Lake” – the symbol of biblical conception. I think that this article is a matrix reaction to this symbol. Translate further, Watson, please.
A little introduction in the beginning:
“Yesterday sixty bearded men sailed into the water area “Orlovskaya Volozhka[116]” in the Saratov region. All of them have only one goal: to catch as more fish as possible: pikes, roaches, perches – everything they could catch. It was the beginning of Russian Spinning Championship. Spinning-fishers consider themselves real aesthetes – they call fishermen with ordinary fishing rods “the primitives with sticks”.
Then there are author’s name and surname: Anton Elin. Should I continue?
Yes, Watson, please.
“Cunning spinning-fishers occupied the resort hotel “Chaika[117]” – woman-administrator has been settling persons with huge rucksacks and hanks of fishing lines then. Now their rooms are piled with fly-spoon baits, voblers, terrible jerk-baits and foam-rubber mutants like squids and vibrating tails. They will spend two days, seven hours each, in their boats with piles of these devices. Gennady Filin[118], famous spinninger, is very skilled in treating with vibrating tails and voblers, but he doesn’t take part in the championship: he wasn’t invited.
– I don’t like mass hysteric fishing, – he said to “Izvestiya”, – there’s no pleasure in this case. Spinning is the most aesthetic fishing. Its charm includes your aims to large loot. The zeal appears then, and vanishes, when trifles go.
– To Filin’s opinion, nowadays fish became cleverer. The days had passed, when a fisherman with primitive “stick” with “Nevskaya” reel and fishing line-cable could catch dozen kilos of “tails”. Now fish pecks only on such perversions as jerk-baits – it is a lure looking like pike disfigured by life. Many professionals spend winters with their cutlasses, trying to deceive clever fish with hand-made baits. Filin has caught his first ruff, when he was three years old. And “went mad” since then, as he says. The mate of Chairman of association “Ros-ohot-rybolov-soyuz”[119], Alexander Clushin[120], on the contrary, can’t stand fishing – but it was he, who invented this championship. According to him, such species as pikes, breams, perches, and even pikeperches are expected in “Volozhka”. After two days of fishing all fish will be weighted and the winner will be awarded with the medal of Russian championship. There are rumours, that the last year winner, Vyacheslav Golubev[121], is not in good form now and will let other participant have his title this year”.
