Текст книги "The Last Gambit"
Автор книги: (IP of the USSR) Internal Predictor of the USSR
сообщить о нарушении
Текущая страница: 17 (всего у книги 21 страниц)
Poly-tandem principle is effective when working on some problems, which are so profound and deep, that they are incomprehensible for the possibilities of the only human person. This leads to one more curious peculiarity of tandem principle, which is the most important for poly-tandem version of working on some problem: the participant of tandem process has no right to lie, because his information not always can be checked by others, and his obviously false opinion, mistook for true by other poly-tandem participant, can serve the base of deeply mistaken decision, which can be very damaging and dangerous.
If to regard some thematically determined spectrum of problems, in tandem principle it’s possible to realize one of methods of interrelations between individual psyche (including intellect) and collective psyche (collective intellect), part of which is individual – tandem participant. That’s the reason for those, who can’t act on the base of tandem principle because of their fanatical selfish individualism, to keep silent about collectivism and unity. Until the individual will be ready to act on the base of tandem principle in his relations with other people, he will breed only collective schizophrenia instead of unity in general, including unity in Holy Spirit; spreading obvious lie is one of ways of schizophrenic fragmentation of collective psyche[109]. Mastering of tandem principle, realized in tandem products in practice, – is the first overcome border to opening the unit life of individuals.”
* *
*
Having read the note twice, I was astonished by dense packing of information in it. Materials of the note put the light on the problems of ancient Egypt administration, which I encountered dealing with “picnics”; and it is besides our interrelations with Holmes, which we never discussed with him. But moreover, the note talked about many other problems of western civilization: what is “democratic elections” and why democracy, under the form existing in the society, isn’t effective; special look on the nature of “copyright” and etc. I thought that discussions about this note could bring up new culture of interrelations between people, as well as between person and society. I understood also, that this note was a part of another, larger work, and that it was worth discussing with Holmes. The rest of time before dinner I was reading the file “The Last Gambit”, comparing what I was reading with the last pictures from different issues of “Chas Pick”, “Trud” and “Arguments and Facts”. The most astonishing thing was not even the celebrity of Russian “picnics” all over the world, but the unusual interpretation of events, concerning with them, by different people in different countries. After Holmes’s notes I saw the world huge and diverse, but more united and integrated, than earlier. Also I was amazed by certain synchronous course of our investigations and by feeling something invisible, but undoubtedly existing, predetermining this activity, which was called “matrix” already. New image of Russia appeared, not only as enigmatic and unpredictable country, which we, western people, became used to, but as special civilization, differing from West and East, where the sources of new millennium culture could be found.
Turning on 5 a.m. news, I got to know about the night terrorist act in Madrid, on the October 12. According to Holmes’s notes, yet on the October 3 Paolo Riego and Andrei Verov discussed in El Escorial the possibility of another act of terrorism, analysing that strange map of Spanish capital with wrench on it. I wondered if Holmes knew about the last events. I knocked at the door of his study.
Come in, Watson, I don’t sleep. I’m studying your recordings thoroughly. I’m interested especially in your conversation with Galba in the bar of “Woldorf”. I have no doubts, that you have met real contemporary Trotskyite.
Holmes, have you heard the last news?
Another plane falling in New York?
No, according to the picture with someone feeding birds on the shore of the black Sea, it will follow later. It was reported few minutes ago about night explosion on the central square of Madrid. I was just studying the copy of strange map with a hand-shaped wrench and reading you comments to it. What does it mean? It can’t be true.
You see now, Watson, fellow, – it can. This is matrix, and matrix is everywhere! Don’t worry. I felt the same, as you feel now, on the October 4, the day after that, when we with Andrew Verov and Paolo Riego were discussing the calendars for 1994 in El Escorial. As you understood from my recordings, the flat-owner gave the most precious forecast of the day of Russian liner collapse, though he saw these maps for the first time, as well as I. And what concerns loud words about new planes falling in New York – be careful, dear Watson, if you don’t really want them to fall down. Words can be overpowering matrixes, if those matrixes appear to be enclosed to the matrixes, which an orator works on. Tomorrow well talk about matrixes more thoroughly, while solving the riddles of Russian “rebuses”. I think we have enough material for making the decision of every “picnic”. And how did you like, Watson, the note “About tandem principle of activity”?
The strangest thing, Holmes, is that I thought about principles of our joint activity for the fist time on the day of your departure to Switzerland. Never before we have raised these questions, but after I’ve read the note, I felt that I was a rider who turned the pedals idly.
Don’t go in for self-humiliation, dear Watson. Each of us does that part of work, which he is more predisposed to. Your approach to “picnics” analysis is rather peculiar. But what concerns the results of tandem activity they don’t belong to any of two partners privately. And such conclusion is rather new for me and, may be not unacceptable, but requiring new comprehension, beyond frequent stereotypes of our culture. Frankly speaking, I have nothing essential to contradict to the conception of “copyright” of the note. Now only one thing is clear: such ideas couldn’t arise in the body of western establishment and consequently we deal with law conscience of new culture. But, excuse me, Watson, I’d like to read your analysis to the end, and then, tomorrow, we will discuss thoroughly both variants, and, as it seems to me, we’ll come to new level of tandem activity.
Tomorrow, after the breakfast, we met in Holmes’s study. He has put on the table three “picnics” in chronological order, calendars from “Chas Pick” and copies of some other papers, which were dealt with “picnics”. And I took the book with A.S. Pushkin’s stories with me.
What’s that with you, Watson?
Before we start the discussing Russian “picnics”, I’d like to read you one extract from Pushkin: “Two fixed ideas can no more exist together in the moral world than two bodies can occupy one and the same place in the physical world”.
“The Queen of Spades”?
You’re absolutely right, Holmes, this is the beginning of the sixth chapter. While studying the analytical note about the film “Matrix”, and also after I’ve read your notes I began to have a picture in my mind of global opposition of two administrative conceptions: biblical and alternative to it – Conception of Social Security. And it seemed to me, that Pushkin in this phrase yet in the beginning of the 19th century expressed very preciously this opposition. And if in this phrase Pushkin paid his attention to informational and material components of the conceptions, then his story in the whole is devoted to its measure component. And therefore – when speaking about matrix-scenarios of the “picnics”, we can found everywhere the traces of “Queen of Spades” numerical measure. And by the way, the numerical measure of queen of spades by Tarot is 51. It’s enough to have one look on calendars in “Chas Pick” №51 (200), on 29.12.93, and №1 (201), on 5.01.94, and the numerical measure of “queen of spades” can be found at once there.
I agree, Watson, though in the paper of 1993 this numerical measure is expressed in its number itself, and on the paper of 1994 it is in the date, if omit “0” between the day and the month. Once I’ve noticed the numerical measure of “picnics” and its similarity to the numerical measure of “Queen of Spades” too. And when in 1995 I encountered with the book “Esoteric tradition in Russian romantic literature” by Lorain Leiton, Illinois University professor, I decided that it will help me in revealing the secret of Russian “picnics”, because more than the half of this book was devoted to numerology[110] of this amazing Pushkin’s story. But nothing of the kind, I’ve found nothing in this book, besides some general speculations about the relations between literature and esoteric doctrines and Cabbala researches. Moreover, I had an impression, that Pushkin in his “queen of Spades” poked fun at his contemporaries-masons infatuation with mystics of Caliostro, Saint-Germain and Svedenborg. Even the biographer of my great-grandfather, Arthur Conan Doyle, didn’t pass these fascinations and became engrossed in spiritualism in the end of his life. So, Watson, in order not to return to the “Queen of Spades” during the analysis of “picnics”, let us distinguish the numerical measure of two conceptions, which appeared indeed in the sixth chapter of the story.
Holmes took a sheet of paper and drew the following table on it:
The “faro” game
Hermann – the symbol of biblical conception
Tchekalinsky – the symbol of COBa
The first phase of the game – the “Historical Picnic”
To the left – 3
To the right – 9
The second phase of the game – the “Defence Picnic”
To the left – 7
To the right – jack (2)
The third phase of the game – the “Post Historical Picnic”
To the left – ace (11), but instead of the ace Hermann[111]
To the right – queen (3)
Summary:
13
14
Well, Watson, let’s follow the game of “faro”, as it’s described in Pushkin’s story. There are some circumstances, by which we can determine that matrix formed by Pushkin through the symbols of “Queen of spades” is embraces the matrix-scenarios of the “picnics”. On the first day of the game Hermann somehow staked 47000. Tchekalinsky notices: “nobody here has ever staked more than two hundred and seventy five roubles at once”. In other words, Tchekalinsky predicts the numerical measure of winnings , but Hermann is oriented towards .
And how does it deal with the “Historical Picnic”?
Let’s have a glance at the first “picnic”, Watson. I’ve read your recordings about your conversation with Galba, where you slaved over the question: “Does he know about “picnics” or not?” No, Galba knew nothing about “picnics” and simply was telling you about August putsch, which was developing in the framework of the “Historical Picnic” matrix. The matrix has ripened, i.e. filled with information and energy, much earlier, and the artist, who has created this rebus from five pictures, has played the function of printer, subjecting to computer, where, in the informational base, the matrix of the first “picnic” already existed. Why did Natalya Chaplina, the chief-editor of “Chas Pick”, give the copy of matrix of the “Historical Picnic in a Name of Artemis” in her newspaper №25 (70) on 24.06.91? – This is another question. Masons all over the world are well informed, that on June 24, 1717 the blue, or John’s, Masonry was legalized, and Chaplina might have done it, subjecting to mason’s discipline, to notify all other masons about the existing plan-script of USSR destroying. By the moment I’ve only learnt, that she, an editor of provincial and, frankly speaking, tabloid paper, was sitting to the left of Gorbachev – the last president of USSR, on the conference of central papers editors of former USSR, on September 17, 1991, one month after the August putsch. The conference was broadcasted by Central television, and she was allowed to be the first who asked questions to Gorbachev – the last USSR president and the last General Secretary of CC CPSU.
Did she know anything about the?
I doubt it strongly, as well as I doubt the capacity of editorial staff members to organize the material of news-paper such way, that it has on its backside the repertoire of six films, which you, Watson, underlined in your investigation.
And then, Holmes, how could those films appear on that very place and give so sharp names to every of five days of the putsch?
All these, Watson, are matrix manifestations, in the framework of which everyone, who was evolved in putsch, acted then, to this or that extent. In this sense the action s of Chapli-na is also the result of matrix manifestations of the “Queen of Spades” matrix, enclosing the “picnics”, because in the first chapter of the story someone mentions about someone named Chapli-tsky, whom the Countess gave the secret of three cards, obviously taking pity on him. But Chaplitsky, unlike Hermann, as I remember, staked not 47000, but 50000 and won three times in a row; he has got 400000 in total, paid his debt of 300000 and so won 100000 at last.
Thus, did Pushkin show what the conception of Hermann’s game “matrix” lacked, by the numerical measure?
You’re right, Watson! 50 – 47 = 3. This is what was called “the trinity of matter, information and measure” in the conception, alternative to biblical. And a little I can add to the story of Galba, who put the “stones” of the first “picnic” in such chronological order, that “treacherous nobody” managed to put the statue of Zeus-Eltsin on the top of power pyramid. However, this doll-statue too in its activity couldn’t go beyond the bounds of Pushkin’s matrix, expressed in certain symbols of “queen of Spades”.
Holmes took the volume with Pushkin’s stories from the table, opened it on the page he needed and started reading:
“He was a man of about sixty years of age, of a very dignified appearance; his head was covered with silvery-white hair; his full, florid countenance expressed good nature; and his eyes twinkled with a perpetual smile”.
Don’t you think, Watson, that this portrait of Tchekalinsky, given by Pushkin in the beginning of sixth chapter, resembles Eltsin very much, as he was shown to West few years after the putsch? And now – there’s this place in the beginning of sixth chapter: “Tchekalinsky began to deal; his hands trembled. On the right a queen turned up, and on the left an ace”. Whom does this description resemble you, Watson?
The head of GKChP, vice-president of USSR, Janaev, during his speech on TV.
Correct, Watson. And it means that Pushkin’s matrix embraces the actions of Eltsin, as well as quasi-opposite to him GKChP. There’s nothing astonishing in it: they all belong to one and the same administrative “elite”, which was called by the abbreviation CC CPSU, which is deciphered (as I was told in Spain recently) as – Central Committee of Capitulating Party of Self-liquidation of Socialism (The words “Union” and “Socialism” both start with “C” in Russian). And Galba was right: their “masters of puppets”, if not they themselves, simply agreed, who would rule in new conditions, and who, after short time in prison, would retire properly; and the last previously have provided themselves with the halo of “strugglers for people’s happiness”, and their “masters of puppets” were supported by the possibility to return legitimately to the script of “socialistic” politics in future. Don’t you agree that if after Eltsin’s victory the lawyers proved the illegality of GKChP then if it’s needed the other lawyers will prove as strictly the fact of state treason of Gorbachev and his followers, and accordingly – the legality and competency of GKChP, whose only fault lies in their un-success. And after we have learnt everything about the conceptual power, we can say, that any legislature is a border of defence, where one conception defends itself from realizing the other conception, incompatible with the first, within the same society. But in conceptually undefined society, as the USSR was during the last years of its life, the contradictory conceptions meet in the same legislature. That’s why on its base, when conceptually defining in addition, one can perfectly prove the accusation of Gorbachev, as well as of GKChP, as well as of Eltsin and the command of reformers of the epoch “Gaidar – Chernomyrdin”. But, frankly speaking, we should be humbler, and remember, that we’re speaking about it basing only on the fact that Russia starts defining itself conceptually, and this is a globally important phenomenon.
And what about the coincidence of numerical measures of the “Historical Picnic” and “The Queen of Spades”?
Oh! As much as you like, Watson. It’s enough to look at the number of order of this newspaper – № 9113. And in addition, Watson, five pictures of the “Historical Picnic” contain 9 palms.
But still I can’t understand, Holmes, what these pictures were published for? Even now, ten years later, their sense is not clear enough, and, I think, then, two months before the putsch, nobody comprehended them.
Dear Watson, I’ve told already, that the “picnic” pictures are the embodied manifestation of the matrix, which has been formed by that time and in the stream of which the following Russian events went. Accordingly, if some event took place in the reality, it means, that in fact it has happened earlier in measure – matrix – component of Life at that moment, when the corresponding matrix-scenario of aggregorial algorithm was formed as the result of people’s psychical activity, and then it lead to this event in the reality.
If some event is not predetermined by God as inevitable, it can be prevented by two ways: the matrix can be split up to incompatible fragments and abandoned energetically, or it can be transformed in such way, that the results of realizing of the matrix-scenario would be acceptable, or better – desirable. After matrix has been formed, and till the moment of appearing of some events according to it, some time takes place, during which the matrix-scenario is filling energetically, and the participants are evolved in it, and it is synchronized with enclosing and just existing matrix-scenarios and so on. During this time the matrix-scenario and processes of realizing its characteristic events can be influenced and subjected by morally conditioned advisability.
Excuse me, Holmes, but there’s nothing if the kind in your notes.
In my notes, Watson, there’s only what I understood at the moment of comprehension of what I have been told. But after the conversations in different countries so many new events, and I had time to think them over and to compare them with my ideas about them. And in that case something was proved by life itself, and something required critical approach and new comprehension. What about “picnic” pictures, to my mind, they played a role of synchronizers of unconscious psychical activity of many participants of those events. The density of information packing within symbols and images much exceeds the density of lexicon information; the circulation of news-paper is several thousands copies; the readers of the news-paper looked through it automatically, and the “picnic” pictures imprinted in the unconscious part of their psyche. Any images, when coming to the light from the unconscious levels of psyche to conscious level, need the adequate lexicon, as you, Watson, need it from me now, for transforming into the concept, joining with the word and this way gaining the sense loading. People walk, drive through the city, they see movie bills, and some of films names can be suitable, for example, to some pictures of the “Historical Picnic”. Happens something like locking of the informative (image) component of trinity on its measure (lexical) component, and as a result people do “unmotivated acts” (as psychologists call that), but in fact they are motivated in the matrix of probable events, which may be filled energetically by them themselves. That’s approximately how I see the events of August of 1991. And, at that, Watson, notice – in the first “picnic” there’s more pictures (Ancient Egypt symbols plus USSR symbols) than text, but in the “Defence Picnic”, on the contrary, lexicon takes much greater part, and there’s minimum of symbols-pictures and them all belong to USSR epoch. The number of movies corresponds to the number of October putsch days in 1993. And here your acquainted Galba has revealed the matrix-scenario of the second “picnic” in the main. He hasn’t only commented the picture in the left corner of the “picnic”, where to the left of the cannon there are the words “behind the bump” and then, to the left of it, the explosion is drawn. This rebus in whole may be read as “There will be explosion behind the bump”. In the lexicon of common Soviet people “behind the bump” means “abroad”. In other words, the algorithm of New York “black Tuesday”, on matrix level, is expressed in the second “picnic”; New York can be considered the greatest “behind-the-bump” symbol. And we all are extremely lucky, that this picture hasn’t been realized in full measure: it represents the “mushroom” of nuclear blast, and, as it’s known, one of the planes hasn’t reached the atomic station in Pennsylvania. And moreover: Galba said, that putsch has gone the wrong way, and cited the words of the Unknown” from Lermontov’s “Masquerade” to illustrate his idea.
Holmes rummaged through his papers on the table, found what he needed and continued.
Why did Galba cite these very words, when there is such place on Lermontov’s drama that is more close to the situation in Russia in October of 1993?
Holmes took the sheet of paper and read: “I had to say you yesterday, that our picnic has been shattered”. The count says it in the second act, and in the final scene he declares essentially, that “The Queen of Spades” matrix embraces the “Defence Picnic” too: “He keeps in silence, doesn’t hear me, or may be he has gone mad”. And it doesn’t matter that these words are addressed to Arbenin, they can be equally corresponded to Hermann from “The Queen of Spades”.
Holmes took the list of 13 films on the back side of the “Defence Picnic” from his table, handed it to Watson and asked him:
What’s the title of the last, thirteenth film from the list, Watson?
“Business Woman”.
Well, Watson, going in for investigation of “picnics” enigma, once I had to learn the symbolic of Tarot cards. According to this symbolic, “queen of spades is active, business woman, widow or independently acting woman.” In other words, the “Queen of Spades” matrix embraces the matrix-scenario of the second “picnic”. Finally, in the “Defence Picnic” there mentioned the speech of Peter I before the Poltava battle. What do you think, Watson, about this speech?
Nothing at all, Holmes, because I have never read the poem “Poltava”.
Neither have I, but I had to get acquainted with its translation and learnt, that Peter’s[112]
[113] The Russian Emperor Peter I the Great is meant. speech before the battle with Swedes was as brief as possible: “Go, and God with us!” – Just a few words, but they are extremely important for understanding the principle of matrix managing. I noticed that you, Watson, distinguished the utmost matrix of God’s Predetermination in the notion of mutual enclosed of matrixes, when you were reading the analytical note about the film “Matrix”. As you have seen for yourself, there are a lot of indications on mutual enclosing of matrixes in the “picnics”, and one of these matrixes lead to the catastrophe in New York and Washington. These matrixes got different lexical definitions in different times; it means, that everyone, who encountered them, called them according to the comprehension of general current of events and objective morality characteristic to him: Galba in his own way, Lermontov and Pushkin in other ways, but for them all, and for you and me too, every matrix is embraced by the matrix of God’s Predetermination, or God’s Providence, as Russians say. But why do I tell you about it, you have learnt it for yourself through the text of the “Marshal’s Song”, where all the mentioned cities – Santiago, Syracuse[113], Pisa, Toulouse – informatively cross this way or that in matrix-scenarios of all three “picnics”.
Notice, Watson, that the “Defence Picnic” appeared in the newspaper two weeks before the August putsch of 1991, and two years before the October putsch of 1993. How do you think, what can happen on matrix level during these two weeks, if the correlation of image and lexical components has been changed in favour of the latter?
I thought about it too, Holmes, and came to the conclusion, that the matrix of catastrophes, which was perfectly described by the count on the villa “Askania-Nova”, started transforming intensively, and those who felt it and didn’t like it, reacted on these matrix changes by using lexicon, i.e., roughly speaking, tried to rape it. But they had no power over it any more.
Watson, all what you have said is correct, but still: why does the matrix of catastrophes started transforming in that exactly period of time?
This I don’t know, Holmes. I can only guess that in this period exactly something very important happened in the informational state of Russia.
You’re right, Watson. And in our further investigation we will go by the second, chronological priority. This very period, approximately in May-June of 1991, in former USSR, the handwriting of the conception, alternative to the biblical administrative conception, has been finished. As I knew from people I met in Spain and Egypt, then The Conception of Social Security hadn’t its contemporary title “Dead Water”, and in its name there was something recommendation-like: “How you should reorganize Bnai-Brit”, appealed to their opponents, ruling the world by biblical conception. Obviously, the collective of authors, giving such a name, hoped to solve the conceptual crisis without catastrophes and tried to speak with leaders of biblical conception in their terminology. The name was originally made by the analogy with Lenin’s work “How you should reorganize Rabkrin”, but however their opponents considered that the developers of new conception were still under the rule of Marxism-Trotskyism. That’s why the orientation of the “Defence Picnic” is Trotskyite, and there’s much lexicon in it, because the inspirers of the “Defence Picnic” were not sure, that their symbols would work properly on the unconscious psychical levels and gave the explanations to them in definite lexicon according to their understanding of goals of country development.
And still, Holmes, I can’t understand, what reasons do you have to speak about their uncertainty?
Well, they are not fools, and understood, that the Conception of Social Security has only the Trotskyite-Leninist name, but anti-Trotskyite content. In other words, the representatives of biblical znakharstvo decided to use this new conception in their own interests, and this lead to their personal conceptual uncertainty, but among mutually enclosed matrixes only that matrix gets the support from Above which is more corresponds to the matrix of God’s Predetermination. Only after that I understood, why did the “Post Historical Picnic” appeared on August 17, 1992 in the newspaper “Chas Pick” №33 (130).
I wonder, Holmes, why did the third “picnic” appear a year later really?
I knew from Andrei Verov in Spain, that it was the time, when the first edition of Conception of Social Security has been prepared, and after long discussions the collective of authors decided to give it Russian epic name of “Dead Water” by one of postscript phrases in almost nameless work. Perhaps, it was their involuntary reaction on anticipating lexicon of the “Defence Picnic”; the third part in it is devoted to the fairy-tale “Three sons”, borrowed from the magazine “Ogonyek” of 1940. I think that it wasn’t easy for the authors of CPS to dare to give their conception such frightening (for many people) name – “Dead Water”. It would be simpler to call it “Live Water”, but it was right what the representatives of biblical znakharstvo persuaded them to do in the “Defence Picnic”. I hope, Watson, you have paid proper attention to my recordings of conversations on this theme in Spain?
Yes, Holmes, I’ve read this place several times and with special attention, and the name of the conception became clearer for me. Indeed, there’s no mentioning of “dead water” in the fairy-tale “Three sons”, but it’s said about the youngest brother that he was “cut”. That means, that the “brothers” brought stumps back to life, and if to say about the situation in USSR after the August putsch, then Russia after the December of 1991 can be considered the “cut youngest brother”.
That was what the West wanted to see in Russia after 1993. But the collective of authors were supported powerfully by matrix of Pushkin himself, when they were choosing the name of their conception. Pushkin continued in 19th century Russian national tradition of life-speaking.
Holmes took again the paper with his recordings from the table and read to Watson the following:
“You will get my “Sovremennik”; I wish it would deserve your approval. Let you be my contributor definitely. (…) Your poems are live water, ours are dead water; we doused “Sovremennik” with it; now you sprinkle it with your ebullient drops”.
How do you think, Watson, who could have written it and to whom he could address?
According to the title of the magazine it was Pushkin, and he addressed to one of his contemporaries and poets.
Yes, Watson, you’re right; it is an extract from Pushkin’s letter of 1834 to Russian poet Nikolai Mikhailovich Yazykov, with a request to take part in the work of “Sovremennik” magazine. What is the most important for us here is Pushkin’s assessment of his poems and his creative work in whole – “dead water”. Why? The answer is – because Pushkin assembled in “Sovremennik” all creative potential of Russia. And notice the sequence: dousing with dead water goes first, and only after that the effect of live water is suggested. And I’ve got to know, that in Russian fairy-tales it’s frequent situation: single live water can’t be used, only after the effect of dead water. But single dead water can be used – for some evil spirits, for making them weaker and destroying at last.
