Текст книги "The spirit of the nation (СИ)"

Автор книги: Марат Нигматулин

сообщить о нарушении

Текущая страница: 2 (всего у книги 15 страниц)

 

Note the fact that almost the entire text of the real literary works was written by the Marat nigmatolivn himself. Only some individual comments and complementarities have an authority belonging to other members of our revolutionary community. Despite this, the thoughts here reflect fully the dominant among us all the views on some of the most important themes of today's politics.

 

Thus, the common words of the words we pronounced, the appointment of the book released explained. Now you can go to the case.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Battlefield Earth! 

 

Mucho el esfuerzo y poco el salario

Genera al fin la revolución! 

 

– from a song by Guatemalan guerrilleros. 

 

So, comrades, let's get down to business. First of all, we need to analyze the surrounding reality. To understand the current situation in our country and around the world. Each of us must keep in mind a clear picture of what is being done on the planet. Only in this way will he be able to always remain a unit of resistance. Anything can happen around you, – reaction, dictatorship, mass murder, – but if you have a clear picture of what is happening in your head, you can save yourself and continue the struggle. That is why you should know what the situation in the world is now, what the situation in our country is. If we want to make a revolution, it is necessary for us.

 

Let's start from affaires. At the end of the First World War in many countries of the world there was a revolutionary situation. Popular unrest boiled everywhere, riots, uprisings and even revolutions began in many countries. However, the economic conditions of most countries, the general underdevelopment of the movement, the mistakes of the leadership and other similar problems ruined the revolution even where it seemed to prevail. Only two countries, Russia and Mongolia, managed to achieve victories. Defeat revolutions for many countries turned into the rise to power of the fascists. The latter turned into the bloodiest war in the history of mankind. A war that has engulfed the world. However, after the Soviet armydefeated the German fascists, – the world was again covered by the revolutionary wave. Then Greek, Italian, French guerrillas expected from Stalin only an order to take power in their countries, – but the order never followed. We'll talk about why it didn't happen. In the meantime, we note that the name of the revolutionary wave finally came down after the forty-ninth year. Then there were two decades of relative calm. This is the time first of the Korean war, and then of the Vietnam War, the time of McCarthyism and the «witch hunt». It was then that the infamous consumer society was finally formed in Western countries. And then came the sixties... 

 

From now on, let's turn our story. Everything that has been happening in the world since the sixties has to do with us. From now on, more details. 

 

The revolution of the sixties was defeated. At least in Western countries. In many third world states, revolutionaries then prevailed. In many – have achieved great success. But in the West, the revolution was completely lost. 

 

The reasons for it's defeat are complex and multifaceted.  It will not be easy to analyze them. We will, however, try to implement it at least in general form. 

 

The first reason for the defeat at that time was obviously economic. Since the end of the nineteenth century, capital has increasingly accumulated in developed Western countries. Already at the beginning of the twentieth century it allowed the European bourgeoisie to significantly improve the financial situation of the working countries of the metropolis. After the end of the Second World War, when the vaunted «welfare state» was established in Western Europe, the process entered it's final stage. European workers, once hungry and disadvantaged, have now become well-fed, smug petty bourgeois, despicable burghers. Yes, by the sixties, the Western world was already properly bourgeois. Of course, the proletariat in Europe remained, but the number of the proletariat fell catastrophically. As a result, the insurgents lost their social base, lost their footing in the people. It turned out to be a defeat for them. 

 

However, for the latter there was another reason – namely the reason subjective. 

 

Many people think that then, in the sixties, there was a flourishing of the new left. This idea is, of course, false. The new left was in it's infancy in those days. Their experience was still insignificant, the theory is undeveloped. They did not seriously influence the policy. 

 

That is why the old left played a key role in the events of that time: anarchists, trotskists, maoists. They had considerable experience and thoughtful theory. At that time they were still supported by a fairly broad mass. That was their advantage. 

 

However, their experience was largely out of date by that time. Old theoretical constructs are increasingly at odds with reality. The support of the masses was still maintained, but in the seventies it too will begin to fizzle out. 

 

As for the new left, they, as we have already said, were in their infancy in those days. They had no experience. Their theoretical constructions were still quite raw. It's funny to talk about the support of the masses! Later, in the seventies, the new left gained some experience of the Resistance. More or less the theory has taken shape. There was a minimal, but still support of the masses. But it was too late! The right moment for the revolution was hopelessly missed! The revolutionary situation was successfully overcome by the ruling classes. 

 

After the revolution of the sixties failed in all Western countries, the planet was gripped by a neoliberal reaction. In fact, the first signs of it's offensive became visible in the sixty-eighth, when General de Gaulle suppressed the now famous uprising. The next few years were nothing. Somewhere the revolution was won, some reactionaries took the upper hand. And then came the seventy-third year: the fascist coup in Chile, the fuel crisis and so on. After that, the reaction went on the offensive on all fronts. And it was the beginning of a nightmare that no one had ever dreamed of. 

 

And now we ask for special attention! What we will tell you next is especially important for all of us. It's important, if only, because it's no longer history. This is modernity.

 

You see, what started in Western countries in the late sixties is not just a reaction. 

 

The usual reaction and looks different, and ends faster. 

 

Here, for example, Stolypinshina. It only lasted four years, just as you know. Or the terrible reaction that came in France after the destruction of theCommune of Paris. Then almost all the leftist forces of the country were defeated for a certain time. But that's what for a certain time! By the end of the seventies, the movement began to revive. The fascist reaction in Germany lasted a long time. It lasted for twelve years! 

 

However, in addition to the duration there are other characteristics. So, we need to understand how all the reactions I mentioned took place. Each of them was a monstrous massacre of the local left. Bloody dwarf Thiers began his reign with the destruction of communes. Stolypin exterminated the participants of the 1905 revolution. Hitler dealt with the German communists. Such bloody periods in history have happened many times. They didn't last too long. At such a time, the bourgeoisie cut out a number of active fighters. That's what she was getting calmed down on. The left movement, of course, suffered significant losses, but always eventually revived. It was reborn quite quickly. The Stolypinshina ended in a thousand nine hundred and tenth. Seven years after it's end, a revolution began in the country. 

 

All these reactionary outbursts were narrownational. Stolypin brutalized only in Russia, Thiers – only in France. Such a reaction was limited to state borders. If it reigned in one country, then in another nothing like this happened. This was another feature of the very reaction we are talking about: the old and decrepit reaction. 

 

This time, however, it was different! The reaction that began in the late sixties was not going to end over the years. On the contrary, every year it was only gaining power, covering new territories, becoming more brazen and unbridled. Therefore, in fact, we do not want to call this phenomenon a reaction. After all, the reaction is something trivial, like the Stolypin gallows. There's something much more creepy in front of us. After all, what began in the late sixties of the last century is not just a dull conservative reaction, not banal government terror. This is a real chronicle of the declared tragedy. The big story of being killed. And the way we let ourselves be killed. 

 

Rising from the depths of the underworld nightmare got the name of neoliberalism. His terrorist policies were called globalization. 

 

The neoliberal reaction quickly became a force. Already in the early seventies it got enough influence. By the middle of the decade. 

 

Neoliberals were able to break up and destroy all large, truly massive left-wing organizations in the metropolis. 

 

By the early eighties, these bastards had completely seized power in most major imperialist states. With furious fury, they destroyed the institutions of the social state, destroyed free medicine and free education. This was done, of course, not only in order to save budget funds (for the war, money is needed!), but also because for effective management the neoliberals had to make the inhabitants of the countries of the metropolis as stupid and sick as possible. After all, sick and stupid are so easy to manage! 

 

Even earlier, since the early seventies, they sought to impose their will also on the peoples of the third world, although they did not do well in this direction. Of course, there were good examples for them like Chile, but it was not like that.In the early eighties, the situation changed. 

 

The neoliberal reaction has intensified to such an extent that it has ceased to be afraid of discontent on the part of the inhabitants of the countries of the metropolis. And who was there to be afraid of now? Society in the states of the center has now finally turned into one large amorphous, smug, drunken, xenophobic everyday herd. Now this herd could be safely driven at least to the pasture, even for slaughter. She was no longer able to resist. The population of the countries of the metropolis was now properly decivilized, demoralized and brought to absolute obedience. From now on, public opinion could be used to spit from the high bell tower. The neoliberal reaction could unhindered support Salvadoran, Nicaraguan, Colombian and other such militants, invade small, recalcitrant countries like Grenada, and wage one overseas war after another. 

 

There was no one to be afraid of now. However, the most terrible something was yet to come! 

 

When the Soviet Union collapsed, the neoliberals were finally brazen. Now they have no serious rivals on the planet. At once the end of history was proclaimed. The order established by the neoliberals was declared a utopia that no one can surpass now. Yes, of course, a little later the neoliberals had to abandon such a concept. We decided, apparently, that it turns out indiscreetly, and refused. 

 

  

The nineties were a time of total neoliberal reaction. At this time it completely enslaved Eastern Europe and the post-Soviet space, invaded China. At the same time, the last pockets of the armed Marxist Resistance in Europe were destroyed. 

 

By the beginning of the twenty-first century, the neoliberal plague had triumphed throughout the planet. The New World Order was finally implemented. Over the world there were thick clouds of the darkest, most terrible, most disgusting reaction. And these clouds, it must be said, with time only thicken and blacken. Now in all the parliaments of Europe sit including outspoken fascists. In many countries, they are even eager to the supreme power. And, most importantly, they are very good at it. The German Nazis are now constantly staging torchlight processions. Including Berlin!  Including Paris Square! Twenty years ago, it was impossible to imagine such a thing. What's going on? Who else at the beginning of the century would have thought that the president of the United States would be elected abominable Donald Trump?! Even during the elections themselves, few people believed in it. No, idonate it. The Americans chose the Fuhrer! It is possible that the «Alternative for Germany» will take over the majority in the Bundestag soon. All this, however, is not the worst. Yes, neoliberalism has brought us something more fearsome than colonial wars, fascist demonstrations and tightly staffed governments. 

 

There have been many reactionary moments in the history of our country.Dark seven years, Contr-Reforms of Alexander the Third, Stolypinshina... Yes, in the time meant, the country recoiled in it's development for many years ago. Yes, many wonderful people turned out to be who is in prison, who is in exile, and who and in the other world. But the reaction didn't last forever! It was over. People came out of prisons, came back from exiles, and social life quickly rekindled. The same was true in French history. The latter was also rich in reactionary periods. First Thermidor and Directory, then the bonapartist reaction, then the reaction of the Bourbon, then the Orleansian, then again the Bonapartist, then the reign of Adolf Thiers, then the Vichy regime, then de Gaulle. And in the same way in times of reaction the social life of the country faded. But as soon as the dark period was over, the progressive forces immediately emerged from the suspended animation. Again revolutionary works were printed, conspiratorial societies again recruited people, and in general active resistance to the state order resumed quite quickly.