Текст книги "Наука в свободном обществе"

Автор книги: Пол Фейерабенд

сообщить о нарушении

Текущая страница: 19 (всего у книги 20 страниц)

БИБЛИОГРАФИЯ

1. Аа. vv. Objections to Astrology. A Statement by 186 Leading Scientists. – The Humanist, Sep/Oct 1975, 35, pp. 4—16.

2. Aa. vv. Velikovski Reconsidered, New York, 1976.

3. Agassi J. Review of Against Methodby P. Feyerabend. – Philosophia, vol. 6, 1976, pp. 165—177.

4. Albright W.F. Yahweh and the Gods of Canaan. New York, 1968.

5. Anderson E. Plants, Man and Life. London, 1954.

6. Aristotle. Аристотель. Сочинения в 4-хтомах. М., 1976– 1984.

7. Ayer A.J. Foundations of Empirical Knowledge. London, 1943.

8. Beckwith J. and Miller L. Behind the Mask of Objective Science. – The Sciences,16, Nov/Dec 1976, pp. 16—19.

9. Binford S.R. and Binford L.R. (eds.). New Perspectives in Archaeology. Chicago, 1968.

10. Boltzmann L. Populare Schriften. Leipzig, 1905.

11. Brentano F. Die Psychologie des Aristoteles. Mainz, 1867.

12. Brown F.A. Persistent Activity Rhythms in the Oyster. – American Journal of Physiology, vol. 178, 1954, pp. 510—514.

13. Brown F.A. Response of a Living Oiganism, Under «Constant Conditions» Including Pressure, to a Barometric-Pressure-Correlated, Cyclic, External Variable. – The Biological Bulletin, vol. 112, 1957, pp. 288-304.

14. Cantor G.N. Review of Against MethodbyP. Feyerabend. – History of Science,vol. 14, 1970.

15. Caspar M. and van Dyck W. (eds.). Johannes Kepler in seinen Briefen. Mimchen-Berlin, 1930.

16. Clagett M. The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages. Madison, 1959.

17. Copernicus N. Commentariolus. – In: Rosen E (ed.). Three Copemican Treatises. New York, 2nd ed. 1959, pp. 55—90. Николая Коперника малый комментарий относительно установленных им гипотез о небесных движениях. – В: Коперник Н. О вращениях небесных сфер. М., 1964.

18. Copernicus N. Letter Against Werner. – In: Rosen E (ed.). Three Copemican Treatises. New York, 2nd ed. 1959, pp. 91 – 106. Послание Коперника против Вернера. – В: Коперник Н. О вращениях небесных сфер. М., 1964.

19. Coulter H.L. Divided Legacy. A History of the Schism in Medical Thought. Vols. I-IV. 1975-1994.

20. Curthoys J. and Suchting W. Feyerabend’s Discourse Against Method: A Marxist Critique. – Inquiry, vol. 20, 1977, pp. 243-371.

21. DeGraziaA. (ed.).The Velikovski Affair. New York, 1966.

22. Duhem P. To Save the Phenomena. Chicago, 1969 [Duhem P. Sozein ta Phainomena, Paris 1908].

23. Feyerabend P.K. Carnap’s Theorie der Interpretation Theoretischer Systeme. – Theoria, vol. 21, 1955.

24. Feyerabend P.K. Wittgenstein’s «Philosophical Investigations». – The Philosophical Review, vol. 64,1955, pp. 449—483.

25. Feyerabend P.K. Eine Bemerkung zum Neumannschen Beweis. – Zeitschriftfur Physik,vol. 145. 1956.

26. Feyerabend P.K. On the Quantum Theory of Measurement. – In: Korner S. (ed.). Observation and Interpretation. London, 1957.

27. Feyerabend P.K. An Attempt of a Realistic Interpretation of Experience. – Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. New Series,vol. 58, 1958.

28. Feyerabend Р.К. Complementarity. – Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplement, vol. 32, 1958.

29. Feyerabend P.K. On the Interpretation of Scientific Theories. – Proceedings of the Xllth International Congress of Philosophy.Milan. 1960.

30. Feyerabend P.K. Das Problem der ExistenzTheoretischer Entitaten. – In: Probleme der Wissenschaftstheorie. Victor Kraft Festschrift. Wien, 1960.

31. Feyerabend P.K. Patterns of Discovery. – Philosophical Review, vol. 59, 1960.

32. Feyerabend P.K. Professor Bohm’s Philosophy of Nature. – British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 10, 1960.

33. Feyerabend P.K. Bohr’s Interpretation of the Quantum Theory. – In: Feigl H. and Maxwell G. (eds.). Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science. New York, 1961.

34. Feyerabend P.K. Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism. – Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. Ill, 1962, pp. 28—97. Фейерабенд П. Объяснение, редукция и эмпиризм – В: Фейерабенд П. Избранные труды по методологии науки. М., 1986.

35. Feyerabend P.K. How to be a Good Empiricist. – Delaware Studies, vol. II, 1963.

36. Feyerabend Review of Erkenntnislehreby V. Kraft. —British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,vol. 13, 1963, pp. 319—323.

37. Feyerabend P.K. Realism and Instrumentalism. – In: Bunge M. (ed.) The Critical Approach. New York, 1964.

38. Feyerabend P.K. On the «Meaning» of Scientific Terms. – The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 62, 1965, pp. 266—274.

39. Feyerabend P.K. Reply to Criticism. – Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. II, 1965, pp. 223—261. Фейерабенд П. Ответ на критику. – В: Структура и развитие науки. М., 1978.

40. Feyerabend P.K. Problems of Empiricism. – In: Colod-ny R. (ed.). Beyond the Edge of Certainty. Englewood Cliffs (NJ), 1965.

41. Feyerabend P.K. On the Possibility of a Perpetuum Mobile of the Second Kind. – In: Mind, Matter and Method. Minneapolis, 1966.

42. Feyerabend P.K. Structure of Science. – British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 6, 1966.

43. Feyerabend P.K. On the Improvement of the Sciences and the Arts, and the Possible Identity of the Two. – Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science,vol. Ill, 1967.

44. Feyerabend P.K. On a Recent Critique of Complementarity, Part I. – Philosophy of Science,vol. 35, 1968, pp. 309– 331; Part II. – Ibid.,vol. 36, 1969, pp. 82-105.

45. Feyerabend P.K. Science without Experience. – Journal of Philosophy,vol. 66, 1969, pp. 791—794.

46. Feyerabend P.K. Against Method. – Minnesota Studies for the Philosophy of Science,vol. IV, 1970, pp. 17—130. Фейерабенд П. Против методологического принуждения. – В: Фейерабенд П. Избранные труды по методологии науки. М., 1986. С. 125-466.

47. Feyerabend P.K. Classical Empiricism. – In: Butts R.E. and Davis J.V. (eds.). The Methodological Heritage of Newton. Oxford, 1970.

48. Feyerabend P.K. Consolations for the Specialist. – In: Lakatos I. and Musgrave A. (eds.). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge, 1970, pp. 197—230. Фейерабенд П. Утешение для специалиста. – В: Фейерабенд П. Избранные труды по методологии науки. М., 1986.

49. Feyerabend P.K. Experts in a Free Society. – The Critic,November/December, 1970.

50. Feyerabend P.K. In Defence of Classical Physics. —Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, vol. I, 1970.

51. Feyerabend P.K. On the -Interpretation of Macrophysical Theories. – Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science,vol. IV, 1970.

52. Feyerabend P.K. Problems of Empiricism. Part II. – In: Colodny R. (ed.) The Nature and Function of Scientific Theory. Pittsburgh, 1970.

53. Feyerabend P.K. Die Wissenschaftstheorie – eine bisher unbekannte Form des Irrsinns? – Proceedings of the German Conference of Philosophy. Kiel, 1972. Felix Meiner, Hamburg, 1973.

54. Feyerabend P.K. Von der beschrankten Gultigkeit methodologischer Regeln. – Neue Hefte fur Philosophie.Heft 2/3, Gottingen, 1972.

55. Feyerabend P.K. Einfiihrung in die Naturphilosophie, Braunschweig, 1974.

56. Feyerabend P.K. Popper’s Objective Knowledge.– Inquiry, vol. 17, 1974, pp. 475-507.

57. Feyerabend P.K. Toward a Humanitarian Science. – In: Feyerabend P.K. Ausgewalte Aufsatze. Wiesbaden, 1974.

58. Feyerabend P.K. Zahar on Einstein – British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,vol. 25, 1974, pp. 25—28.

59. Feyerabend P.K. Against Method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London, 1975. Фейерабенд П. Против метода. Очерк анархистской теории познания. М., 2007.

60. Feyerabend P.K. Imre Lakatos. – British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vo26, 1975, pp. 1 – 18.

61. Feyerabend P.K. Logic, Literacy, and ProfessorGellner. – British Journal for the Philosophy of Sctence,vol. 27,1976, pp. 381– 391.

62. Feyerabend P.K. On the Critique of Scientific Reason. – In: Howson C. (ed.). Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences. Cambridge, 1976, pp. 309—339.

63. Feyerabend P.K. and Agassi J. Comments and replies. – Philosophia,vol. 6, 1976, pp. 177—191.

64. Feyerabend P.K. Changing Patterns of Reconstruction. – British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,vol. 28,1977, pp. 351– 369.

65. Feyerabend P.K. Marxist Fairytales from Australia. – Inquiry,vol. 20, 1977, pp. 372-397.

66. Feyerabend P.K. From Incompetent Professionalism to Professionalized Incompetence – The Rise of a New Breed of Intellectuals. – Philosophy of the Social Sciences,vol. 8, 1978, pp. 37-53.

67. Feyerabend P.K. Science in a Free Society. London, 1978.

68. Feyerabend P.K. Derwissenschaftstheoretische Realismus und die Autoritat der Wissenschaften. Braunschweig-Wiesbaden, 1978.

69. Feyerabend P.K. Reply to Heilman’s Review. – Metaphilosophy,vol. 10, 1979, pp. 202—206.

70. Feyerabend P.K. Problems of Empiricism: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Cambridge, 1981.

71. Feyerabend P.K. Realism, Rationalism and Scientific Method. Philosophical Papers. Cambridge, vol. I, 1981; vol. II, 1983.

72. Feyerabend P.K. Wissenschaft als Kunst. F. am Main, 1984.

73. Feyerabend P.K. Farewell to Reason. London, 1987.

74. Feyerabend P.K. Against Method, 2nd revised ed. London, 1988.

75. Feyerabend P.K. Three Dialogues on Knowledge. Oxford, 1991.

76. Feyerabend P.K. Killing Time: The Autobiography of Paul Feyerabend. Chicago, 1995.

77. Feyerabend P.K. Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction Versus the Richness of Being, ed. B. Terpstra. Chicago, 1999.

78. Feyerabend P.K. Knowledge, Science and Relativism: Philosophical Papers, vol. 3, ed. J. Preston. Cambridge, 1999.

79. Fritz K. Antike und moderne Tragodie. Berlin, 1962.

80. Galilei G. Dialogue Concerning The Two Chief World Systems, tr. S. Drake. Berkeley, 1953. Галилей Г. Диалого двух главнейших системах мира. – Галилей Г. Избранные труды в 2-х томах. Т. 1. М., 1964.

81. Gellner Е. Beyond Truth and Falsehood. – British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,vol. 26, 1975, pp. 331—342.

82. Gershenson D.E. and Greenberg D.A. The «Physics» of the Eleatic School: A Reevaluation. – The Natural Philosopher,vol. 3, 1964.

83. Gingerich О. Crisis’ vs. Aesthetic in the Copernican Revolution. – Vistas in Astronomy,vol. 17, 1975, pp. 85—95.

84. Godelier M. Mythe et histoire: ^flexions sur les fondements de la реп8ёе sauvage. —Annales. Economies, Socidtds, Civilisations, vol. 26, 1971, pp. 541—558.

85. Gottsched J. Chr. Schriften zur Literatur. Stuttgart, 1972.

86. Grant E. A Source Book in Medieval Science. Cambridge (MA), 1974.

87. Hanke L. All Mankirifl is One. A Study of the disputation between Bartolom6 de Las Casas and Juan Gi^s de Sepiilveda in 1550 on the intellectual and religious capacity of the American indians. DeKalb(IL), 1974.

88. Hanson N.R. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge, 1958.

89. Hanson N.R. The Mathematical Power of Epicyclical Astronomy. – Isis, vol. 51, 1960, pp. 150—158.

90. Harrd R. Review of P.K. Feyerabend’s Against Method. – Mind,vol. 86, 1977, p. 294-298.

91. Hattiangadi J.N. The Crisis in Methodology: Feyerabend. – Philosophy of the Social Sciences,vol. 7, 1977, pp. 289—302.

92. Hattiangadi J.N. Playphilosopher. – Philosophy of the Social Sciences,vol. 8, 1978, pp. 59—61.

93. Heisenberg W. Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. New York, 1958. Гейзенберг В. Физика и философия. Часть и целое. М., 1990.

94. Heilman C.D. The Comet of 1577: Its Place in the History of Astronomy. New York, 1944.

95. Heilman G. Against Bad Method. – Metaphilosophy,vol. 10, 1979, pp. 190-202.

96. Herz N. Keplers Astrologie. Wien, 1895.

97. Heyerdahl T. The Ra Expeditions. New York, 1972. Хей-редал Т. Pa. М., 1970.

98. Hodson R.R. (ed.)The Place of Astronomy in the Ancient World. Oxford, 1974.

99. Howson C. (ed.). Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences. Cambridge, 1976.

100. Illich I. Medical Nemesis. Random House, 1976.

101. Jantsch Е. Design for Evolution. New York, 1965.

102. Johnson F.R. Astronomical Thought in Renaissance England. Baltimore, 1937.

103. Jung C.G. Synchronicity. An Acausal Connecting Principle. – In: The Collected Works of C.G. Jung. Vol. 8. London, 1960.

104. Jungk R. Die Atomstaat. Vom Fortschritt in die Unmen-schlichkeit. Miinchen, 1977.

105. Kamen H. The Rise of Toleration. New York, 1967.

106. Kepler J. Conversation with Galileo’s Sidereal messenger, tr. E. Rosen. New York, 1965. Кеплер И. Разговор с звездным вестником. – В: Кеплер И. О шестиугольных снежинках. М., 1982. С. 33—68.

107. Коугё A. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore, 1957. Койре А. От замкнутого мира к бесконечной вселенной. М., 2001.

108. Krafft F. Copernicus retroversus, I: Copernicus fulfills Greek astronomy. – In :Colloquia Copernicana III.Wroclaw, 1975. Pp. 113-123.

109. Krafft F. Copernicus retroversus, II: Gravitation und Kohasionstheorie. – In: Colloquia Copernicana IV.Wroclaw, 1975. Pp. 63-76.

110. Kristeller P.O. Renaissance Thought. I and II. New York, 1961, 1965.

111. Kuhn T.S. The Copemican Revolution: Planetary astronomy in the development of Western thought. Cambridge (MA), 1957.

112. Kulka T. How Far Does Anything Go? Comments on Feyerabend’s Epistemological Anarchism. – Philosophy of the Social Sciences,vol. 7, 1977, pp. 277—287.

113. Lakatos I. and Zahar E.G. Why did Copernicus supersede Ptolemy? – In: Westman R.S. (ed.). The Copemican Achievement, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London, 1975.

114. Lenin. Ленин В.И. Детская болезнь «левизны» в коммунизме. Пекин, 1965.

115. Levi-Strauss С. The Savage Mind. Chicago, 1966 [Levi-Strauss C. La Pensde sauvage. Paris, 1962]. Леви-Стросс К. Первобытное мышление. М., 1994.

116. Loemker L.E. (ed.). Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Philosophical Papers and Letters. Dordrecht, 1969.

117. Mach E. Analyse der Empfindungen. Jena, 1900. Max Э. Анализ ощущений. М., 2005.

118. Mailer N. Of A Fire on The Moon. London, 1970.

119. Manuel F.E. The Religion of Isaac Newton. Oxford, 1974.

120. Mao Tse-Tung. Oppose stereotyped Party Writing. – In: Selected Works of Mao Tse-Tung. Vol. 3. Peking, 1965.

121. McEvoy J.G. A «Revolutionary» Philosophy of Science: Feyerabend and the Degeneration of Critical Rationalism into Sceptical Fallibilism. – Philosophy of Science, vol. 42, 1975, pp. 49-66.

122. Mill J.S. On Liberty. – In: Cohen M. (ed.). The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. New York, 1961. Милль Дж. С. О свободе. СПб., 1906.

123. Millikan R.A. Albert Einstein on His Seventieth Birthday. – Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 21, 1949, pp. 343– 345.

124. Mitchell J. (ed.). Psychic Exploration. A Challenge for Science. New York, 1974.

125. Mundvar G. Radical Knowledge. A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature and Limits of Science. Indianapolis (IN), 1981.

126. Nelson J.H. Shortwave Radio Propagation. Correlation with Planetary Positions. – RCA Review, 12. March 1951. Pp. 26—34.

127. Nelson J.H. Planetary Position Effect on Short Wave Signal Quality. – Electrical Engineering, 71. May 1952. Pp. 421—424.

128. Owen G.E.L. Tithenai ta phainomena – In: Moravcsik J. (ed.). Aristotle: a Collection of Critical Essays. New York, 1967.

129. Pagel W. William Harvey’s Biological Ideas. New York, 1967.

130. Piccardi G. The Chemical Basis of medical Climatology. Springfield (IL), 1962.

131. Plutarc. Плутарх. Жизнь Солона. – В: Плутарх. Избранные жизнеописания. Т. 1. М., 1990.

132. Popper К. R. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Prin-ceton, 1950. Поппер К. Открытое общество и его враги. Т. 1—2. М., 1992.

133. Popper K.R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, 1959. Поппер К. Логика научного исследования. М., 2004.

134. Popper K.R. Three Views Concerning Human Knowledge. – In: Popper K. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York, 1962. Pp. 97—119. Поппер К. Три точки зрения на человеческое познание. – В: Поппер К. Предположения и опровержения. М., 2004.

135. Popper K.R. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford, 1972. Поппер К. Объективное знание. Эволюционный подход. М., 2002.

136. Price D.J. de Solla. Contra-Copernicus: A Critical Re-Estimation of the Mathematical Planetary Theory of Ptolemy, Copernicus and Kepler. – In: Clagett M. (ed.). Critical Problems in the History of Science. Madison, 1959.

137. Rand A. Kant Versus Sullivan. – The Objectivist. March 1970.

138. Randall J.H. Aristotle. New York, 1960.

139. Rosental S. (ed.). Niels Bohr, his Life and Work as seen by his Friends and Colleagues. New York, 1967.

140. Rossi P. Philosophy, Technology and the Arts in the Early Modern Era. New York, 1970.

141. Rossi P. Hermeticism and Rationality in the Scientific Revolution. – In: Righini Bonelli M.L. and Shea W. (eds.). Reason, Experiment and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution. London, 1975.

142. Schachermeyr F. Die friihe Klassik der Griechen. Stuttgart, 1966.

143. Schlipp P.A. (ed.). Albert Einstein: Philosopher – Scientist. Evanston (IL), 1949.

144. Stemheim C. Ausdemburgerlichen Heldenleben. Neuwied, 1969.

145. Tibbetts P. Feyerabend’s Against Method: The Case for Methodological Pluralism. – Philosophy of the Social Sciences,vol. 7, 1977, pp. 265-275.

146. Tibbetts P. A Response to Feyerabend on Science and Magic. – Philosophy of the Social Sciences,vol. 8, 1978, pp. 55—57

147. Toulmin S. (ed.). Physics and Reality. New York, 1965.

148. Tromp S.W. Possible Effects of Extra-Terrestrial Stimuli on Colloidal Systems and Living Organisms. – In: Tromp S.W. and Bouma J.J. (eds.). Proceedings of the 5th International Biometeorological Congress, pp. 239—248. Supplement to International Journal of Biometeorology,vol. 16, 1972.

149. Verfaillie G.R.M. Correlation Between the Rate of Growth of Rice Seedlings and the P-indicesofthe Chemical Test of Piccardi. A Solar Hypothesis. – International Journal of Biometeorology,vol. 13, 1969.

150. Watson L. Supernature. London, 1973.

151. Westman R.S. The Comet and the Cosmos: Kepler, Mastlin, and the Copemican Hypothesis. – In: Colloquia Copernicana I.Wroclaw, 1972, pp. 7—30.

152. Westman R.S. Michael Mastlin’s Adoption of the Copernican Theory. – In: ColloquiaCopernicana IV.Wroclaw, 1975. Pp. 51-61.

153. Westman R.S. The Melanchthon Circle, Rheticus, and the Wittenberg Interpretation of the Copernican Theory. – Isis,vol. 66, 1975, pp. 164-193.

154. Worrall J. Against Too Much Method. – Erkenntnis,vol. 13, 1978, pp. 279-295.

155. Yates F.A. The Rosecrucian Enlightenment. London, 1972. Йейтс Ф. Розенкрейцерское Просвещение. М., 1999.