355 500 произведений, 25 200 авторов.

Электронная библиотека книг » (IP of the USSR) Internal Predictor of the USSR » The Matrix and “The Matrix” — two opposites. (On the recipe of obtaining “freedom” in the movie “The Matrix”) » Текст книги (страница 1)
The Matrix and “The Matrix” — two opposites. (On the recipe of obtaining “freedom” in the movie “The Matrix”)
  • Текст добавлен: 21 октября 2016, 18:02

Текст книги "The Matrix and “The Matrix” — two opposites. (On the recipe of obtaining “freedom” in the movie “The Matrix”)"


Автор книги: (IP of the USSR) Internal Predictor of the USSR


Жанр:

   

Политика


сообщить о нарушении

Текущая страница: 1 (всего у книги 3 страниц)

Internal Predictor of USSR

The Matrix and “The Matrix” – two opposites

On the recipe of obtaining “freedom” in the movie “The Matrix”

St-Petersburg

2001

1. Just another movie?

Many, especially from among the youth, have already seen the movie “The Matrix”. There are different opinions about the film, but its popularity is undebatable. Even in V. Putin’s book “From the first person...” there is mention of the film by the president’s youngest daughter: “We now have a new favourite movie – “The Matrix” – but dad has not seen it yet. We invited him. He said he does not have time, but will definitely watch it later”. So, what is the movie about?

At first sight – another thriller, which will be forgotten having made no meaningful influence on the minds and morals of spectators, who, after some time, will crave for a new violent spectacle, but in different scenery. A brief content of the film is as follows:

A young man named Thomas Anderson works in a software company, and in his free time is engaged in hacking from his home PC. With hacking being his major pastime, his “skills” improved so much, that he became one of the best hackers on the planet. On the internet, Anderson searches for the head of a secret criminal organization – a man called Morpheus, but that man contacts Anderson himself. Morpheus arranges a meeting between his aides and Anderson, offering to answer the only question that really interests Anderson – “What is the “Matrix”?” – during an in-person meeting. Anderson agrees, and the meeting happens, changing the fate of the entire planet.

According to Morpheus, the habitual world seen by all of us, exists as a neuro-interactive model, supported by a machine-computer system called the "Matrix", and the planet Earth (at least for the last two hundred years) – is a lifeless desert, above which hangs a gray veil of clouds, a sky without the Sun and stars. Such is the result of the activity of a technocratic civilization, which ended in a war between people and machines, in which the machines, having won and taken power over humanity, grow people as a bioenergetic raw material to maintain their own activity.

However, in these circumstances exists a “resistance” movement, called “Zion”, which continues the war against absolute power of machines over people. In the virtual world created by the “Matrix” acts a key character called “the Oracle”. She, as it is said in the film, “knows everything”: that which was and that which will be. For this reason, the main characters – Neo, Trinity, Morpheus – visit her by means of unauthorized access into the “Matrix”. According to Morpheus, after the “Matrix” was just created, there was a man born inside who was capable of changing the “Matrix” as he saw fit. It was he who freed the first people from the “Matrix” to begin acting in the real world. This man has long died, but by the Oracle’s prophecy he will return, and his return will lead to the collapse of the “Matrix” and will end the war between machines and people.

Since he has not yet arrived, Morpheus’ team conducts an information war for freeing people, hacking into the “Matrix” from onboard a hovercraft called “Nebuchadnezzar” in search of the saviour of mankind. They are opposed by so-called “Agents” of the “Matrix”, who look like people, but are capable of taking on any appearance and greatly surpass the “physical” and “paranormal” capabilities of common people.

Both sides hunt for Anderson, driven by their own aims: Agents want to use Anderson to hack into the Zion mainframe; Morpheus sees in Anderson the new savior of mankind – Neo, capable of freeing people from enslavement by the “Matrix” dreamworld. In this aspect, the storyline has much in common with Biblical narratives, according to which (both by the Old and New Testaments) the saving of mankind should be obtained through the Messiah – God’s Messenger. Since the story in the New Testament is more widespread in Western society, then the movie has analogues of its main characters: Neo – analogue of Christ, Morpheus – analogue of John the Baptiser; the film also has its own Judah.

The development of this storyline has all the features inherent to all thrillers: multiple chases, artistically arranged fights, colourful killings, tickling situations where the “happy-end” hangs by a thread, and other attributes of the genre. All the captivating scenes show the achievements of contemporary computer graphics, and it is they which are most attractive for the young spectator.

But all of that is abundant in other thrillers, and therefore cannot explain the vast popularity of “The Matrix” in the world. So maybe other than the special effects, the movie has another, more important meaning, the unconscious desire to understand which makes the film so popular; especially amongst youth, who is only preparing to enter into self-dependent life?

2. The hunt for man and questions of life and death

“The hunt for the man has begun!” – with these words begins the main storyline of the film. This phrase expresses the essence of technocratic civilization: it is anti-human, simply because it destroys the biosphere without which humans cannot live. The anti-human nature of technocratic civilization manifests in different ways, among which is the inadequacy of informational content to the form of its delivery. The western regional civilization, in the second half of the 20th century, has been leading in development of technology, especially in its mass use in all areas of life. As such, the West has also become the leader in dragging humanity down into technocratic catastrophe. Just like it leads in creation of packaging for various products, the West leads in creation and improvement of ways and means of conveying information: TV, radio, mobile telephony, Internet, email, Video-conferences, social networks, etc. have become more and more used in the world as a result of technological superiority of the western civilization and its active global trade policy. Having become the technological leader, the West has done well to impose its views on problems of development of humanity and ways of solving them onto other cultures, including the Russian culture.

But being a developer and producer of effective forms of conveying information, the West cannot suggest any substantially new content that could fill these forms. Western scientists and theologists are afraid of directly and openly admitting this: after accepting the Bible as the true “word of God”, the West has blinded itself in a worldview sense, and became fruitless when it comes to new content; “Conscience – within the limits of the Bible, Bible – within the limits of Knowledge”, said “humorist” M. Zhvanetsky. All past and contemporary worldview developments of the West – various philosophical schools and doctrines of antiquity, including Marxism – determining the future of civilization, cannot take the westerner outside the pen of the Bible. It is possible that, being unconscious of this dead-end, searching for a way out of it, the West has become more attracted to everything Oriental: spiritual practices, yoga practices, Eastern martial art schools, Buddhism, “Islamic fundamentalism” that is actively spreading among the western population, and the like. As the XX century has shown, in adopting the achievements of cultures of other regional civilizations, the West only successfully adopts the forms, generally losing or perverting the content.

And with this background of a seemingly endless biblical swamp, “The Matrix” appears on screens at the end of the XX century – a significant and, in its own way, unusual phenomenon, because it represents a rather successful attempt to break free of biblical answers to vital questions. These answers were formulated several thousand years ago by the znakhar[1]1
  Znakhar (Rus. “знахарь”) – a “witch-doctor”, an individual possessing certain knowledge about how the world works, but using it to serve their own selfish interests while exploiting society, and wittingly cultivating ignorance and perverted knowledge in the exploited society.


[Закрыть]
(priest) hierarchy of ancient Egypt in the course of unfolding the Biblical project of enslavement of all of humanity, and establishment of its absolute demonic power based on programming people’s psyche by a false faith-teaching. The discussion of this faith-teaching, at least for the last two thousand years, has been blocked by various declared and undeclared “taboos”, and primarily in the West, which has become the citadel from which were made enslaving lunges at neighboring peoples.

“The Matrix” has broken this “taboo”. Although indirectly, it touches upon problems that are key in resolving the crisis of development of contemporary technocratic anti-human civilization, leading spectators to the questions: what is the meaning of their life on Earth? Why is human culture vicious and is leading it to military or ecological suicide? do people want to continue being hostages and captives of machines created by them, especially after the creation of artificial intelligence? what are the possibilities for survival? what are true relations of humans with God, with Savior, and satan? Such subject matter, meaningful for the lives of people and all of humanity, is an extremely rare occurrence in western cinema. Maybe that’s why the film is so popular around the world, but it’s popularity is peculiar proof of the fact, that the questions mentioned above worry even those, who are not inclined to consciously discuss them in certain lexicon.

At the same time, the film is a product of western, biblical culture, and it speaks about the problem of resolving the crisis of all of humanity in this culture’s symbolic-allegorical artistic language. In the artistic languages of other other cultures (Islamic, Buddhist, Russian, Hindu, etc.), these problems and ways of resolving them would have likely been shown differently. But until these problems are not formulated in certain lexicon, excluding the possibility of ambiguous understanding of the subject matter, their resolution will be suggested to society in bypass of its conscious in a symbolic form through “the most accessible of all arts – film”. With that, the artistic composition will represent a sort-of undeclared compromise between the strive of humans to escape from bondage, and the strive of global znakhars, ruling the biblical project of enslavement of humanity, to keep everyone prisoner of its lies. This applies to “The Matrix”, the allegorical subject matter – the second semantic line – of which are alien to Western biblical civilization and undermine its basis.

The statement that “The Matrix” represents such an unconscious compromise between the strive to freedom and the strive to slave-ownership, is supported by the fact that Morpheus – fighter against the evil “Matrix” – and his followers do not discuss the viciousness of its algorithmics. However, having broken out of the “Matrix” they despise, representatives of the “Zion” system are actually constructing an alternative “matrix”, regardless of whether they understand this or not. The owner of this alternative “matrix” in the film is the Oracle, who “knows everything”. But the essence of the alternative matrix is also left out of discussion, and the life of humanity under this “matrix” are left behind the scenes in a silent, but undetermined and therefore baseless assumption, that everything will be good in the alternative “matrix”.

The fact that this part of the plot is not shown in the foreground does not mean that its vision remains outside the conscious mind of a thinking, attentive spectator. It is possible that, to support certain associations, the character names in the film were chosen in such a way, that the unconscious of the spectator would make their conscious work in a certain way, needed by the script writers and their curators.

As if justifying his name, Morpheus believes that the objective reality and images of it in the human psyche are not interconnected, similar to how it happens in dreams, when the unconscious processes certain information acquired while awake, and the conscious watching the dream – having mostly lost its will – sees images unnatural to the real world that is perceived in an awake state. This is normal for dreams, but in an awake state it is characteristic to a psyche that is more-less engulfed by schizophrenia.

After such a conclusion, any analysis of the film plot’s windings may be perceived as a discussion of schizophrenic and narcotic delusions of the script authors and producers-directors of the film; and the popularity of the thriller may be explained as the psychological illness of all who watched it with interest and pleasure. And even though the society of the global civilization really is morally-psychologically not quite healthy, and for some “The Matrix” – really is a screening of their schizophrenic or narcotic visions or nightmares, nevertheless in the name of continued freeing and healing of social psyche it is necessary to show the connections of the images of “The Matrix” with the objective reality as they really are, and therefore – to uncover the allegorical worldview component of the thriller that makes it so popular.

Two socially useful worldview affirmations may be drawn from the film. They are conveyed in an open form to the average spectator-commoner – in the general case a careless consumer of various pleasures, “bread and circuses”, – first and foremost, the American spectator-consumer:

● you are not mammals – i.e. you are not people, you are not human – you are a virus, “people are a disease, the cancer of this planet, and we (machines with intellect – in the context of the film) are the cure”;

● “SYSTEM FAILURE” – this text appears at the end of the film on a computer display.

If the former affirmation is more or less clear (the global biospherical-ecological crisis is more than obvious), then the latter requires some explanation.

As it is known to anyone who is at least a little familiar with computers, after a system has failed, in the best case the system needs to be restarted, in the worst case the operating system and applications need to be reinstalled from scratch. In other words, the text on the computer display at the end of the film is transparently implying, that the former system of global control of humanity, under the guidance of which a human-like virus-commoner is accustomed to carelessly and insatiably consuming life, after its collapse, will leave (in the near perspective) each person one-on-one with the global problems of humanity and the planet. And these problems have a systemic nature, not a local-personal one.

These two affirmations, stated directly, together represent a hint to the virus-commoner: it’s high time to start thinking about resolving problems created by his parasitism on other members of society and the biosphere of the planet.

Such thoughts may be lead in two mutually-exclusive directions:

● on what, how, and under the guard of what new “Matrix” to continue parasitizing?

● how to stop parasitizing and build an alternative system of relations between everyone and each-other, and Mother-Earth, first and foremost, as a basis for a following, universal development of each human being and humanity as a whole?

Essentially in these implications, about the necessity to answer one of the two questions, is everything positive and good that is stated directly in the film. Which one of the two questions to answer – that is one’s personal choice. Is there sense in searching for answers to these questions, or better to continue carelessly consuming life, and let everyone else search for answers? – this question is also answered by each person himself.

All other positive and good in the film is expressed allegorically and, therefore, many questions need to be answered. But before all else, it is necessary to answer the following question:

Is there something objectively existing in Nature, which is named "Matrix", that is symbolically represented by the machine system, which in the film is a prosthesis of the Biosphere for humanity and the factory of sleepy dreams about ostensibly “real life” of everybody? Or the authors of the film, in light of their schizophrenic worldview, see the world in a painfully perverted way, and the “Matrix” is not an allegory to something real, but the authors’ delirium?

The question of “What is reality?” is asked in the film, but the declared answer to it, stemming from individualism cultivated by the biblical culture, is given in the sense of “solipsism”[2]2
  Solipsism (Lat. solus – singular, and ipse — oneself): a theory, according to which exists only the human and his consciousness, and the objective world, including other people, exist only in the conscious perception of an individual. (“Philosophical dictionary”, Politizdat, 1981.).


[Закрыть]
: only what you perceive is real. Lifting the statement “real is what you perceive” to the rank of a general law of life – is cultivation of one’s own schizophrenia, a campaign to substitute with a psycho’s thoughts the real life that is outside the limits of his perception.

A representative of the species “Homo Sapiens” perceives only a part of the Objective reality. However, to the questions: how is the Objective reality organized? how do the portion perceived by a subject at every point in time, and the Objective reality as a whole, interact? – each spectator is given the opportunity to answer by himself, so as to not fall into schizophrenia or not to lock up inside the world of one’s own mind. At the same time, the capability of the viewer to not notice these questions, and other questions arising from them is, in a way, already an answer to each one of these questions.

But without answering them, it is impossible to answer the two mutually-exclusive questions which are transparently implied in the film:

● either how human-like viruses-consumers can continue to parasitize without the support of some “matrix”, which has collapsed?

● or how to stop parasitising and start living humanely?

Now we return to the fact, that the machine system, fabricating dreams of life of humanity, who supports the machine system energetically (to be a “battery” for the system – is the main purpose of humanity in the film), has been named “The Matrix”. In our times, this word is commonly known as a mathematical term, defined as a two-dimensional table, in the cells of which (at the intersection of every row and column) exist some mathematical objects, including new matrices. The latter defines a matrix in a general sense as a mathematical object, conceptually tied to the multidimensional space of formal parameters. Also, matrices are a means to to give structural organization to sets[3]3
  “Set theory” is a branch of mathematics where a “set” (a collection of objects) is a fundamental notion.


[Закрыть]
(of some objects) and establish interrelations between different sets (this has become especially applied in database programming). And in this quality, matrices have the properties of metrological standards, with which elements of structurally ordered sets are correlated.

But all of the above is an understanding of the word “matrix” in a narrow professional sense. The general meaning of the word is much wider. The Merriam-Webster dictionary gives the primary definition of “matrix” as “something within or from which something else originates, develops, or takes form”. And all the meanings of this word, accepted in various domains, are in one or another way tied to this notion – that a matrix (in printing trades, in machining of materials, etc.) is an essence, giving the initial image to something which is created from it, and also giving orderedness to the matter which is modified based on the matrix. That is, the word “matrix” incorporates into itself all meanings about the creation of some image, in accordance with the Predetermination, on the matter of some information carrier.

3. Mathematics and God’s Providence

Accordingly with the definition of the word “matrix” given above, the machine system fabricating dreams about the life of humanity is named correctly. But this leads to the question: is the machine system the Matrix, or it belongs to another matrix which predetermines its existence and operation?

To avoid limiting the generality of reasoning, it is better to assume that the machine system, localized on planet Earth, may only exist and operate only, if it has a place or “cell” in a superior, enclosing matrix, within a certain arrangement of mutually-nested matrices. The superior matrix, in turn, occupies a cell in a more superior, higher level matrix. This way, in the process of considering the successively widening subordination of mutually-nested matrices, which predetermine the existence of nested matrices and processes created by them (including the existence of universes), we come to two questions, an affirmative answer to one of which is a negative answer to the other:

● does there exist a limit of this successive widening of matrices? that is, does there exist a certain all-enclosing matrix, predetermining the existence of all matrices nested in it and the possibilities of filling them with some matter and information?

● or this limit does not exist, and the order of matrices, enclosing nested limited matrices, may continue to be built, creating more and more new possibilities of existence of various worlds?

Humanity has come to these questions multiple times, and over the course of history various worldview systems (schools) answered these questions in mutually-exclusive ways. But in all the diversity of developed and detailed worldview systems, they all may be correlated with one of two classes of answers:

● There exists a limit of the escalation of these matrices, and the process of escalation of this order of mutual enclosure of matrices, leads to equating the limit of the sequence[4]4
  Like integrals with infinite integration boundaries may converge to finite quantities.


[Закрыть]
with a certain all-enclosing matrix, named from the ancient times as... God’s Predetermination of the Life of the Universe.

● There objectively exists only a certain basic element of life, a sort-of building block of the universe, “a fundamental element”, with “addition”, “multiplication”, “subtraction”, and other operations applied to it. Application of these operations on the element leads to an order of mutual inter-links of individual matrices of life, which can be limitlessly escalated, not converging to any certain all-enclosing matrix.

Both views accept infinitely widening orders of enclosure of individual matrices of life, but express qualitatively different understanding of this infinity: in the first case, it is an initially predetermined from Above “infinity”, and in the second case it is “infinity” built by trial and error of escalation and transformation of individual matrices, representing “finished elements” in this infinite “construction”. At first sight, both mutually-exclusive views are equally grounded, and to judge about the truthfulness or falseness of either one of them does not seem possible.

But giving it some thought, the first view is correct: there exists some all-enclosing predetermination, as a result of which the process of escalation of the order of mutually enclosing individual matrices of life, and their filling with matter and information, fails, if there is an attempt to create something, that has no place in the all-enclosing matrix – God’s Predetermination.

In the worst case, the laws of physics and chemistry, which manifest the highest of currently constructed predeterminations, could be changed with the spawning of any new matrix-superstructure, enclosing the matrices preceding it in the order of their mutual enclosure, and completing (temporarily) this order, which corresponds to the “second law of dialectics”, according to which quantitative changes lead to qualitative changes[5]5
  The formulation of the second law of dialectics about the passage of quantitative changes into qualitative changes is superficial and ambiguous. In reality:
  There exists an interdependence of quality with order and quantity, and accordingly – quantitative and order changes lead to qualitative changes, and qualitative changes manifest in changes of order and quantity.
  It is useful to note, that in comments to the traditional formulation of the second law of dialectics, the notion of “measure” is often mentioned, but nothing is said about the order, even though the same quantity may be ordered differently, leading to a different qualitative state, as the case is with isomers in chemistry.


[Закрыть]
.

Besides that, accepting the second view creates the necessity for having, besides some fundamental “matrix” (“building block”), the means allowing to escalate this the order of mutual enclosure. This is one and the same God’s Predetermination of Life, but smuggled into reasoning either due to thoughtlessness, or to avoid calling things their proper names.

But the two mutually-exclusive assumptions express different worldviews, which are also mutually-exclusive. The first is God-centric, coming from the fact that the Universe as a whole, and the planet Earth in particular, are God’s creation, a result of the Predetermination of the Creator and Almighty, and the life of a person with such a worldview lies within the course of God’s Providence.

For a human, living within the course of Providence, it is natural to realize that the Universe is united and whole, and everything in it (including relationships between people) is causally-determined and multi-optional (generally) within the aims of Providence. And any person builds their life in the course of God’s Predetermination either in harmony with Providence, or opposing It with their actions. In the first case, God for the human is the super-Universal reality, the Hierarchically Highest All-enclosing control, with Which the human constantly strives to maintain certain ethics of personal relations based on his actual morality. In the second case, goes the process of constant (more often than not – unconscious) resistance by the individual to God’s Providence, in which manifests a certain morally-based worldview of the individual.

In the first world-understanding, measure (Russian “mera”) and matrix are different words for the same objective phenomenon. And if one understands God’s Predetermination of Life as a multidimensional matrix of possible states of all matter in the Universe, then some portion of the matrix – God’s Predetermination – is accessible to the human sense of measure (sense of proportion). Accordingly, any attentive and good-willed human, who is given from Above the ability to distinguish (discriminate) cause-effect chains of his own life and the circumstances around him, perceives the manifestation of God’s Providence as Hierarchically Highest All-enclosing control, and is thus able to and strives to act in harmony with God, within the course of His Providence based on the individual’s own sense of measure.

The second worldview may be called “I-centric”, or ego-centric. In its essence, it is either completely atheistic, lifting human to the level of God or conqueror of Nature, or arrives at pantheism, equalizing the Universe with God, and accepting that not everything in Nature can be controlled by humanity. But in either case this worldview insists that the Universe, the Earth and its biosphere and humanity have somehow “self-created” (but even then the unconscious of adherents of this worldview generates the question: “from what?”) either as a result of an explosion (again a question: “of what?”) or as a result of lengthy evolution (again: “of what?”).

Such a worldview also has the property of perceiving the objective reality as a collection of unconnected accidental facts or coincidences, processes and phenomena, the constantly changing multitude of combinations of which determines for them the evolutionary development of the universe, happening “by itself” in accordance with the discovered and still undiscovered laws of nature. This is a result of the fact, that the invisible for the atheist cause-effect chains between different (from the atheist’s point of view) phenomena, in which directly manifests the Hierarchically Highest all-enclosing control of the Almighty, are considered as objectively “non-existent”: everything that the individual cannot perceive directly is by many considered as objectively non-existent.

Such a worldview places at the center of the universe (be it unconsciously) either the person and his limited capabilities, or the laws of nature, having discovered which the person begins to see himself as the “crown” of nature. But “I-centrism” stays “I-centrism” independent of the breadth of his horizons: “If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants”, said Isaac Newton.

And due to lack of understanding of their own atheism, adherents of “I-centrist” worldview perceive the strive to comprehend the one God and His Providence for his creation as opposing the strive to cognize the laws of nature.


    Ваша оценка произведения:

Популярные книги за неделю