Текст книги "Egoist is like one sitting for long in a well"

Автор книги: (IP of the USSR) Internal Predictor of the USSR

сообщить о нарушении

Текущая страница: 3 (всего у книги 3 страниц)

American cultural supremacy has been tackled by Z. Brzezinski many times, but he did not consider in details the quality aspects of the kind of mental structure which statistically prevails in America, and of the one dominating over statistically prevailing mass, just as this is reflected in the American culture.

The same questions that he either did not notice or considered useless to explain to his students, are relevant with regard to another question, namely – who, as bearers of a particular type of mental structure, are «magnetically attracted» by American culture: human-like, biorobots, demoniacal personalities or those who aspire for humanism?

These questions are neither raised nor tackled by Z. Brzezinski; nonetheless he answered them in his book in the following way:

«More generally, cultural change in America may also be uncongenial to the sustained exercise abroad of genuinely imperial power. That exercise requires a high degree of doctrinal motivation, intellectual commitment, and patriotic gratification. Yet the dominant culture of the country has become increasingly fixated on mass entertainment that has been heavily dominated by personally hedonistic[26] and socially escapist themes[27]. The cumulative effect has made it increasingly difficult to mobilize the needed political consensus on behalf of sustained, and also occasionally costly, American leadership abroad. Mass communications have been playing a particulary important role in that regard, generating a strong revulsion against any selective use of force that entails even low levels casualties.

In addition, both America and Western Europe have been finding it difficult to cope with the cultural consequences of social hedonism and the dramatic decline in the centrality of religious-based values of society. (The parallels with the decline of the imperial systems summarized in chapter 1 are striking in that respect[28].)The resulting cultural crisis[29] has been compounded by the spread of drugs[30] and, especially in America, by its linkage to the racial issue. Lastly, the rate of economic growth is no longer able to keep up with growing material expectations[31], with the latter stimulated by a culture that places a premium on consumption. It is no exaggeration to state that a sense of historical anxiety, perhaps even of pessimism, is becoming palpable in the more articulate sectors of Western society <…>.

That lack of confidence has been intensified by widespread disappointment with consequences of the end of the Cold War. Instead of a «new world order» based on consensus and harmony,[32] «things which seemed to belong to the past» have all of a sudden become the future. Although ethnic-national conflicts may no longer pose risk of a central war, they do threaten the peace in significant parts of the globe. Thus, war is not likely to become obsolete for some time to come[33]. With the more-endowed nations constrained by their own higher technological capacity for self-destruction as well as by self-interest, war may have become a luxury that only the poor people of this world can afford. In the foreseeable future, the impoverished[34] two-thirds of humanity may not be motivated by the restraint of the privileged». (“The Grand Chessboard”, pp. 250,251).

So, if all this is true, then the USA should concentrate on internal problems– to develop their own culture and not to encroach on reforming of the rest of the world, first, making of it a province to ensure the exceedingly growing hedonist (to say in Russian-all devouring voluptuous) expectations of the American metropoly, and than-something yet unidentified but named already «new world order» which is to be established «beyond the last global superpower».

But what we read further is quite different:

«Unfortunately, to date, efforts to spell out a new central and worldwide objective for the United States, in the wake of the termination of the Cold War, have been one-dimensional. They have failed to link the need to improve the human condition[35] with the imperative of preserving the centrality of American power in world affairs. <…>

In brief, the US policy goal must be unapologetically twofold: to perpetuate America’s own dominant position for at least a generation and preferably longer still; and to create a geopolitical framework that can absorb the inevitable shocks and strains of social-political change while evolving into the geopolitical core of shared responsibility for peaceful global management» (“The Grand Chessboard”, p.p.253,254).

To be noted that the priority of goals, as outlined in the last paragraph, namely: 1) America’s dominant position, 2) creation of a geopolitical framework for peaceful global management (what implies that there are no grounds for mutual hostility between peoples), – is controversial to what Z. Brzezinski promulgated in the paragraph of «Introduction» that has been cited above and examined in essence, namely: 1) to shape a truly cooperative global community, in keeping with the fundamental interests of humankind, 2) America’s global primacy in transitional period as guarantor of the fundamental interests of humankind.

It has been shown earlier that these goals do not always coincide. But given the problems facing the West and the USA, – in particular, in their development based on their inherent culture, which demonstrates statistical supremacy and dominance within society of certain inhuman types of mental structure, – whose actual existence is admitted by Z. Brzezinski himself,– the hierarchy of the US political objectives, promulgated by the author in the last paragraph cited (see the last page of the book) is tantamount to suppression of the fundamental interests of humankind for the sake of insatiable voluptuousness and ambitions of the «demonized» American elite.

Policy is a type of management. In the meantime, the theory of management suggests that it is objectively impossible to exercise management when the objectives and the hierarchy of their significance are unidentified and the simultaneously determined goals are incompatible. The doctrine outlined by Z. Brzezinski does not meet this criterion. In case the management is exercised tacitly, i.e. when its goals and the means of their achievement «go without saying» – and hence, the above principle is not relevant,-inevitably come unpredictable consequences which depreciate even the results achieved so far (as it was the case of the US NSC Directive 20/1 of August 18, 1948, in the sense that the execution of its main provisions between August 18 and 23, 1991 has generated even more serious problems for the USA) and may even invalidate them completely (in the West this is called sometimes the «effect of monkey’s paw»). It happens because the tacit (when it «goes without saying») and declared (direct definitions) approaches are practically mutually suppressing by virtue of different objective and subjective factors; besides, in the social life they generate phenomena which are the result of their interaction.

The same is true, if the present Z. Brzezinski’s book relates to that information flow, by which the true American bosses are washing brains of those crowd members who are interested in politics and thus require for their self-psychological comfort some quasi-truthful explanation of the current events and of how they correlate with the officially declared ideological doctrine of state and with political strategy promoting this doctrine. As far as the bosses themselves are concerned, they are relying, in particular, on the doctrine, which has been designed for a very limited circle of initiated persons, – and thus better corresponds to the world’s reality,– but which is impossible to articulate in the society in its true dimension without provoking meaningless riot against their dominance or-what is even more dangerous for the bosses,-without generating a meaningful freedom-loving action by those whose future choice is humanism.

If the latter is the case, then the concealed political doctrine and the doctrines declared with the purpose to «reason» the crowd in general and its substrata (parts) are inevitably contradicting each other in some of their aspects. But the crowd and its substrata are being self-managed on the basis of collective consciousness and unconsciousness generated by its individual members, and thus in those aspects of social life, where the activity of structures initiated into the real doctrine is inadequate, these structures are loosing their competence. Meanwhile, the foundations of society’s established structure are undermined by phenomena which are gaining strength, along with the crowd falling out of management exercised by the hierarchy of structures of mutual deception-whether big or small – whose chiefs are persons initiated in true villainy.

Such processes of loosing of management ability may develop in reticence and than suddenly become obvious in particular circumstances, when the crowd, inspired by its collective consciousness or unconsciousness, demonstrates unexpected behaviour.

Objectively, such was the internal mechanism of state collapse in the USSR, the same mechanism exists as well in the USA, and it is «working» already...

The very problems in the life of society arise from the truthful lie which has been purposefully proliferated in the crowd beforehand under the cover of ideological, economic doctrines and the doctrines of state political activities.

To avoid that anything similar happens in society, the real doctrine of self-management organisation therein should be so formulated that one could directly proclaim it in this society without resorting to any kind of «transformers»; otherwise, it gains well-looking and moral attractiveness while remaining the source of calamities and villainies in practical policy.

In other words, whatever viewpoint you take, the doctrine of American international policy, as formulated by Z. Brzezinski in his book, represent a danger for America itself ; the answer why it is so, is given by the Apostle James who said: « he is a double – minded man, unsteady in all his ways»,– because the same is applicable to societies.

Of course, one may try, as conceived by Z. Brzezinski, to use the coming opportunity of God’s connivance with regard to peoples standing backward vis-à-vis the USA ( as the US see it), but it would be more secure – for America itself as well as for all other countries – not to do this, otherwise America itself, in its historical kind, will loose its status on the «chessboard», and not of Eurasia but of the whole world: fortunately, inside it there are quite enough internal causes that may entail far reaching and wide-range consequences.

We presume, therefore, that Z. Brzezinski has failed to achieve his initial objective – «the formulation of a comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is the purpose of this book», – though he himself, his American readers, students and those who «inspired him for glories», may have another vision of his works. As long as this type of world-outlook suggested by Z. Brzezinski in his book, continues to prevail in American political establishment, the USA are protected against global policy – pursued in conformity with either Biblical, Scientological, Marxist-Trotskyist or other projects – even to a less degree than Russia under Nicolas II or than the USSR of the Khrushchev-Brezhnev-Gorbachev – times.

September 19-29, 1998

[1] K.Prutkov. «Fruits of meditation. Thoughts and aphorisms», 25.

[2] The names of such institutions are significant. In Japan – Institute for Global Problems Studies, in the USA – Center for INTERnational Studies...

[3] See how «we did it ourselves» in the analytical note «Four stages of informational security»

[4] This historian should not be mistakenly identified with A.N. Yakovlev, former Politburo member, who has the same name.

[5] The text is our own translation of the text founded in N.N. Yakovlev’s book. If someone finds original text he is welcome to send it to us for updating the present note and other works using the information.

[6] Very similar to what has been done by A.N. Yakovlev (former Politburo member) and by KGB General Kalougin.

[7] Koba (or probably Coba) – one of J.V. Stalin’s party pseudonyms in the period before revolution

[8] After the failure of the SEC – State Emergency Committee – there was even a caricature in a newspaper showing the Kremlin’s wall with memorial boards that cover the urns with ashes. One board inscription was: «Z. Brzezinski – founder of the CIS».

[9] As some chess-lovers who use sometimes to play alone both white and black figures– for and against themselves; and as chess problems are solved.

[10] «Basic instinct» is the name of American film related to «erotic» group.

[11] The main provisions of the global Biblical project of the ancient hierarchs of the cult of Amon (Amen, Amune, Omen, Amine – as different accents and transliterations suggest) are envisioned in Deuteronomy,23:19,20; Deuteronomy,28:12,13 (28:12 as in the text of 70 translators – Septuagint);Isaiah,60:10-16; Matthew,5:17,18.

[12] We consider this «outcome» to be intermediate, if any.

[13] He forgot to mention in this context that in the course of the first five years after the war the USSR has proved to be capable without American or other countries help :

to recover the pre-war level of production in all industries; after this the economy started to function in the regime of annual planned price-decrease matched by such production growth, which had never been previously observed in any country of the world within the history of global civilization;

to liquidate American monopoly in the field of nuclear arms (also by secret services operations of penetration into American nuclear programmes);

to lay foundations for subsequent space conquest, earlier than in America, and for the world’s highest rates of socio-economic development that did exist in the fifties and that turned to be discouraging for western economists, as follows from the economic analytical papers of those days. This process fade away only because the post-Stalin leadership of the country had decayed – under connivance of the masses of party-members and of the rest of people – and was unable to resist the activities which were carried out on the territory of the USSR in conformity with the above cited NSC Directive 20/1 of August 18, 1948, and with other similar instructions.

[14] As after the end of the Second World War the world was not unanimous in its assessment of the USSR and of the USA, the same was remaining true with respect to the USSR till the time when its authority was undermined by Khrushchev-Trotsky followers with their false exposures in the course of the XX party congress and provocative actions against the USA in «Caribbean crisis».

[15] It would be correct to say : anti-Christian Biblical traditions.

[16] This name given to a region perfectly explains why the Far East became a part of Russia and not of China which for many centuries failed to settle these regions situated so far from Moscow.

[17] According to our information, even during the period of military hostilities on Damansky Island, there was no anti-Russian propaganda in China. The propaganda was conducted in the sense that the Soviet people is good but at present time it is surviving difficulties which are caused by the fact that the power within the party has been seized by renegades and revisionists who turned the USSR from the socialist way of development, such as pursued by China, and this brings about conflicts between both countries.

[18] Generally speaking, the crassness is not equivalent to genial simplicity. And that is why Z. Brzezinski mentioned the decisive feature of the US culture that devalues all others, though this is not clear.

[19] COB – is the transliteration of the Russian abbreviation for the Conception of Social Security. One can read about it in the note “About COB in Brief”, which is available at , www.vodaspb.ru and

[20] If we take Russian society, it is the stone thrown at all followers of the Laodicea Church (Apocalypses, Revelation, 3:14).

[21] That is why the indigenous population was exterminated and the biocenoses that had emerged on the US territory by the time the European colonizers appeared there, were extinguished.

[22] V.I. Lenin told: «The major art for us is cinema»

[23] The destruction by American Navy of the Japanese aircraft-carrying formation in the area of Midway Islands in 1942 became a turning point in the fights to achieve control over the Pacific in the Second World War of the XX century.

[24] As reported on June 26, 1990 by the newspaper «The Soviet Culture».

[25] His Providence has not yet been known because one believes in Him, but nobody believes Him. (An unknown Russian author )

So, don’t mix to believe in God (which is usually understood as the belief in the simple existence of God) and to believe God (to believe God – is to believe what God says to be true).

[26] Hedonism (Greek hedone means «pleasure») – an ethical doctrine, asserting that delight, pleasure is the chief objective and motivation of the human behaviour (Epicure). In new times it is characteristic for utilitarism. Utilitarism is a principle of evaluation of all phenomena from the standpoint of their utility. To keep close to the terminology of contemporary living languages– hedonism is the slavery within voluptuousness which devours everything without reserves, thus being suicidal.

[27] And, as a result, these problems are not being resolved in advance, thus aggregating as a snowball and giving birth to collective mentality of the type «avalanche of mistakes».

[28] We have not cited how Z. Brzezinski describes the mechanism of collapse of empires of the past but just mentioned it.

[29] By the end of his book the author has probably forgotten what he wrote earlier in it about unrivalled American cultural supremacy. What to do, «he is a double-minded man, unsteady in all ways».

[30] No use to reproach the Columbian narco-barons and the bosses of the golden triangle in the South East Asia: supply is caused by DEMAND. This is the axiom of the world where the values and ideals are identical. But where they are not identical a proverb may be applied: « a pig will find its mud», and if not, then it will make mud itself. Once the idiots whose choice are narcotics, are deprived of these narcotic drugs – they will implant electrodes in the pleasure centres as if they were guinea-pigs, and continue to press the button to achieve agony and die in voluptuousness, surrounded by virtual reality of computer world. They were simply grown up voluptuous, living as parasites in the society, no matter whether in America or in Russia or elsewhere.

[31] The words selected reminiscent those of the CPSU Central Committee report to a congress in the Brezhnev’s times. In addition, Z. Brzezinski does not mention anywhere that the planet can not stand this keeping up with the unlimited growth of expectations, and how these expectations should be limited in order not to cause catastrophe of the present Earth’s biosphere, otherwise the humankind will inevitably suffer if not disappear.

[32] Better would be adding: “the master and the slave”.

[33] Two paragraphs earlier the author, as we remember, deplored that the American public opinion disapprove any use of military force that entails even low levels of casualties.

[34] Not impoverished but robbed in the past by colonialism and in the present by money-lending policies of advanced western countries and the Jewish banking community.

[35] Human in what sense: with the animal structure of mentality, biorobots, demoniacal personalities or still Human beings?