Текст книги "To Understanding of Macroeconomу of State and World"
Автор книги: (IP of the USSR) Internal Predictor of the USSR
сообщить о нарушении
Текущая страница: 4 (всего у книги 4 страниц)
High quality of management in accordance with the implemented practical policy (either manifestly, or by default) can be achieved in Russia only if a Russian feels himself a master at work, in distribution sector, in consumption sector. In Russia, top quality management can be achieved only if the policy is targeted at the establishing of Lord’s Kingdom on the Earth, that is ‘communism.’
It was proven by economic, scientific and technological ‘wonders’ of Stalinist йpoque[15]. Honestly, slave labour is inefficient, so the peoples of the USSR could rise –for three decades – from primitive plough (and some of them – from the primitive state) to the heights of technological and scientific progress and the best in the world educational background. Labour at that time was efficient because the people gained a new quality of freedom, which they lacked in the Russian Empire, and what those who criticize that йpoque and personally I.V. Stalin, cannot understand.
Although everything presented here was written in the tideway of a particular concept opposing ill-will (as we see it), nevertheless, the concept and glossary of economics for masters itself allows to use it for production and distribution management in line with the concept of ‘how many of those bastards’ do we need and how to keep their bodies and souls together at a minimum subsistence level so that the ‘real people’ were always very well off.
That is why we need to shed some light on the general matters of jurisprudence, particularly, the problem of property.
3. Ownership
Right is an open possibility to do something having a guarantee that you would not be hurt by retribution for what you have done. According to Russian outlook on the world, such notions as ‘right’ and ‘rightfulness’ are mutually connected, and their word roots are the same. Therefore right expresses righteousness, so right is higher than the law, which may express unrighteousness. The assertion that ‘Right’ and ‘Law’ are synonyms comes from ill-will and is an example of obtrusion of mixed up notions on the society in order to substitute right by unrighteous law.
Correspondingly, if we traverse the subject within the framework of the system of thinking where ‘Right’ and ‘Law’ are synonyms, we will have to distinguish in social life two categories of rights:
objective rights, given to humans and humankind from Above; the first of them includes the others – the right to be the Vicar of Lord on the Earth in good faith and in accord with the meaning of the Revelations.
subjective rights, established by the participants in social life on the base of their morality-wise arbitrary will, which can express either righteousness or unrighteousness.
Hence, there may be, and there are conflicts between objective rights, following which, we can see the expression of the Agency of Providence, and subjective ‘rights’, when the lawmakers make an attempt to prevent the Agency of Providence from being done with the help of their own pong.
People render other people ‘competent’ to have any outlook, but the God, as the Revelations say, does not give a human a credit for being an atheist, i.e. denying His Being or worship something or someone of created by Him, and He does not give people a credit to fall into Satanism.
Atheists are the people who carelessly or logically denies a real fact that God gives proofs of His Being to every person by responding to their prayers with changing the circumstances in which the person lives, the more expressively, the more responding is the person to God’s appeals to him through his consciousness, through other people, works of art, and signs in ordinary situations.
However, even atheists have to admit that ‘objective laws’ really exist, whether or not they entify their Source, for every time people or humankind break the objective laws, the retribution follows, carrying damage, illnesses, traumas, social disasters and global ecological crisis of biosphere as the severest of the retributions that people could hail on themselves.
The meaning of objective human rights is often stated in the Revelation, but unfortunately when Revelations were codified into books called ‘holly books’, the sense of the Revelations was either hidden or distorted, or replaced by pong, or replaced by the opposite. But the holly books never have to be the foundations of religion – an intimate, sensible link between human sole and God – but only a reminder of the need of such a link to lead a righteous life on the Earth.
As a result, the conflicts between the canons of EACH (including secular Law) holly books, its canonical interpretations and real life is solved by people believing God directly in accord with his consciousness and in the wholeness of perception of particular circumstances of life.
This is the background of the outlook for considering codified and not codifies laws and separating them into two categories:
a normal algorithm of self-management of a society in accordance with Providence in particular circumstances;
subjective ‘rights’, established on the base of degradation-parasite moral, which hampers creation of the Lord’s Kingdom on the Earth.
Ownership is one of many rights. It id exercised by the subjects-owners in relation of property subjects. The right is exercised either by disclosure or by default. At the same time, disclosures in real life can be oppressed by collateral defaults. The breach of Biblical Commandment ‘thou shalt not steal’ by the Biblical prescript to Jews to deal in global usury based on racial, corporate foundations can serve an example of such a state.
Albeit if the subjectively established ‘rights’ entrench upon breaking of rights objectively given from Above, the objective rights will work, even if there is a delusion that the subjective ‘rights’ are exercised. An example is the Ascension of Christ, reported in the Koran Revelation (4:156) and explaining the meaning of the Solomon’s prophecy. But the ‘eye witnesses’ who did not sincerely believe God, authenticated the Crucifixion of the Holly Man, after which they have been maintaining the cult of execution of holly people for thousands of years in a mindless hope to achieve the bright future basing on that faith, contrary to the word: ‘You will be given to your faith’.
The concepts of social structure based on good will, people cannot be the objects of property, neither openly (slavery, feudalism, serfdom), nor by default (capitalism being strangled by usurers or being strangled by personal ‘copyright’ for the objects of ‘intellectual property’.)
The notion of right of ownership to capital goods has a special position among the ownership rights, because it is the source of lots of things in legislative control of economic life of society.
The notion ‘right to own capital goods’ is meaningfully explained only as the right to control production and output distribution, either personally, or through proxies.
The notion of right to such objects as land, mines and carriers, water and other natural resources means the right to organize labour of people exploiting the natural resources, as well as a right to restrict access to non-productive use of them (for leisure purposes, etc.)
Right (seen as a subjective right, established by society) and cost are intrinsic features of social organization, not nature. When such rights are purchased, we pay for the result of human labour activity in the past, present or, a possible result in the future. Pay for the cost of natural resources and goods, which do not have cost, is a limitation by nominal paying capacity to use them and create the sources of payment for the work, which facilitates their reproduction by forces of nature itself.
The notions of private and public ownership are connected with social division of professionalism and its reproduction when there is a generation change in the in social unification of labour. They are explained through the way of formation the circle of managers.
Property is private, in case the staff servicing the capital goods as a whole does not have a real possibility to immediately suspend from office those who violated their trust and hire or promote from their circle new managers.
Property is public, if the managers who violated trust or did not cope with their responsibilities to enhance management quality can be immediately excluded from the management sphere on the demand of the staff servicing the aggregate capital goods. It is based on the condition that the social base of the managerial corpus is not a limited social group where the representatives of other groups are not admitted.
Public property for something in a managerial sense is impossible to introduce by laws, because there is a dominant view that public de jure is nobody’s de facto, and the nobody’s de facto will become private, personal or corporative. Furthermore, the right to fire a manager can only be useful when the staff realizes that the only reason of firing him is inability to manage at a necessary quality level in accordance with the concept of social life, which is supported by the society. In particular, the use of a managerial position for personal and family-or clan enrichment may be a reason of instant firing.
But the same right in hands of a mindless crowd and a sponging lumpen proletarians will force the most qualified and caring managers out of business and replace them with talkers, who will call their own professional inadequacy to be sabotage of their inferiors, and will make a lot of fuss before they will be expelled; and the public property will be robbed by a lumpenised crowd. It happened in 1917 and caused a disaster, the same thing happened during the perestroika and ‘democratisation’.
Public property right comes from the outlook of a particular person and the society as a whole, but not from juridical declarations. Firstly a moral-outlook basis should emerge, which will turn collectively used property to capital goods into social property, whatever legal implementation. Only later, the domination of public property de facto will express itself judicially. If there is only judicial formality, but there is no moral-and-outlook basis, the ‘public’ property is doomed to remain private property in hands of a corporation of villain managers.
That is another reason why there will be no revival of capitalism in Russia, and there will never be ‘civil society’.
Private property may be either personal, or corporate. In the last case it may formally look like public. In the USSR, ‘nationwide’ state and cooperative-state farm property were formally public, but because of ‘elite’ exclusiveness and the lack of public control over the state bureaucracy, who started to reproduce itself from generation to generation in dynasties, the public property as a whole turned into private ‘elite-corporate’ property, whilst the response of the rest of the population of the USSR was nothing but condonation. It was the showing of real state of moral in the CPSU and among the non-party members. At the times of perestroika and ‘democratisation’ the judicial base was put under the factual state.
However it did not fit the ideals of everybody, so the ‘elite-corporate’ perestroika and ‘democratisation’ were doomed to collapse, because in Russia there is internal, conceptual power, which is an alternative to the global, charlatanic and daemonic power.
Global policy of creation of the Kingdom of Lord on the Earth will be implemented in Russia in accordance with the objective plan, given from Above. This is the policy of cleansing to free the Earth from everyone who opposes it.
Afterwards
If the stuff of the brochure does not seem to be full and detailed enough to you, you may find much more detailed materials on the website http://mera.com.ru/category/library/ in ‘English’ section.
The Internal Predictor of the USSR
[1] By global policy we mean heterogeneous activities targeted at executing purposes at the whole humankind level, irregardless of the fact whether such activity is a component of domestic foreign policy, or it is performed by the local or multinational mafia.
[2] Its range exceeds the production spectrum range, as the production spectrum also includes the possibilities to use some free goods (forests, beaches etc.) that are not produced by the society.
[3] Abstracting from culture that joins the whole society, we can point to another (except credit-and-finance system) means of assembling a macroeconomic system from a number of microeconomic subsets. It is the socially established system of metrology and standards, which is necessary to make the goods and services offered by different producers applicable.
[4] M. Kasyanov was right in his evaluation of the program by Mr G. Gref: ‘The mountain gave birth to a mouse. Luckily, not a cockroach.’ Hinting that there are cockroaches in the heads of the program authors he.
[5] Efficiency of the use of raw materials and parts in such technologies have to be taken into account when calculating the energy efficiency coefficient.
[6] Compare: One kWh cost is about 1cent in poor countries (including Russia), whereas in the USA and European countries it comes up to 10cents. The hour rate in Russian military-industrial complex sector is 60 Rubles (about US$2), in the USA in the same sectors it is $17 – $20, and in Japan – $35.
They are the parameters of tuning of the global system of robbing Russia and other poor countries. That is why Russia is robbed twice; firstly – when energy is exported (tariffs are the trade secret of Unified Energy System of Russia, which allows them to do double-entry bookkeeping), when there are POWER CUTS in the regions, and secondly – when importing the goods that were produced at high tariffs and high hour rates. Correspondingly, the export policy of UES is adverse to the interests of the peoples of Russia.
[7] 'Sir Joseph Stamp, the former president of the Bank of England, also warned against the power of bank establishment: «If you want to remain the bankers’ slaves and go on paying off the costs of your slavery, let them continue issuing money and rule the national loan’ (Ralph Epperson «The Invisible Hand. Introduction into History as a Conspiracy», SPb, 1999, p. 140).
[8] The very emergency cut-offs would have been a direct analogues of the ‘gold standard’ crash when building an energy backing of a monetary unit based on the electric power consumption tariffs.
[9] A year is a natural unit of measurement of the duration of manufacturing and consumption cycle, for cyclicity of seasons defines the cyclicity of manufacturing and other branches (not only agriculture); it also determines the ciclicity of consumption, nonproductive activity of the society. So, a year and its multiples are the most convenient rated durations of production cycles in a multiple production-and-consumption system.
[10] It must be noticed that the catastrophe potential – the nominal paying capacity, outgoing the turnover at the prices administered by the state – was created in the йpoque of N. S. Khrushchov – M.S. Gorbachov.
[11] Fraction 1/(S+K) – is a characteristic scaling factor which makes dimensionless all the nominal credit-and-finance indicators of diversified systems of production and consumption and their functionally-specified components. A theory of similarity of diversified systems of production and consumption is based on that scaling factor of dimensionless, which is used as a tool of correct comparison, analysis, forecast and planning of production and consumption activity at macro– and microlevels.
[12] Steady prices are an indirect step to indefinite value of energy standard of means of payment backing.
[13] Among such parties are KPRF, LDPR, ‘Yabloko’ ‘The Union of Right Forces’ and other, less known mobs.
[14] The main ecological problem is to define the maximum volume of production of technogenic energy that would not cause damage to the biosphere; technogenic energy distribution has to be restricted by the following:
Power plants do not have to produce fuel decay products which are not natural for the circulation of matter in nature, (neither their quantity composition, nor quality emissions). Any kind of nuclear power stations is biospherically impermissible, because it can lead to changes of biosphere because of the decay products of nuclear fuels.
technogenous, energoinformational flows in the areas where power is generated, transported and consumed should not distort the natural energy flows and their seasonal rhythm on a scale that could lead to climatic changes that cause biocenosis destruction.
[15]Nowadays, an artificially blown cult of G.V. Zhukov, who really was an outstanding on-land military leader of the XX century is designed to sink I. V. Stalin and his deeds into obscurity. I. V. Stalin coordinated battle line, rear, the whole home and foreign policy. He coordinated the whole politics of communism construction practically, not verbally, which makes him different from Trotsky and Khrushchev and the subsequent ‘leaders of world communism’ and ‘eurocommunism’in particular.
In that position – the position of the Supreme Coordinator of the Soviet Union, I. V. Stalin was irreplaceable for the whole span of history after 1917.
If we consider the activities of G.K.Zhukov beyond his military specialization, we will see that in the cold war, ignited by the wheeler-dealers of Biblical-Talmudic project after 1945, G.K.Zhukov was their tool to a great extent. In particular, he never rose a question of creation and application of the navy force of the state, and played a great part in Admiral Kouznetsov-bating. As a result, during the 30 years-long command of S.G. Gorshkov, the USSR navy looked powerful, but it was not, within the limits that were necessary to keep peace and social-economic development of the USSR. That illusory state, much deteriorated since then, was inherited by Russia.
