Текст книги "False Testimony"

Автор книги: Rose Connors

Соавторы: Rose Connors
сообщить о нарушении

Текущая страница: 12 (всего у книги 14 страниц)

Chapter 27

Saturday, December 18

Saturday mornings in our office tend to be busy, particularly for the Kydd. He handles most of the misdemeanors that come our way, and Friday nights—particularly the cold, dark ones—seem to foster misdemeanor mania. He has a full lineup this morning: all the usual suspects and a handful of new recruits. Minor drug busts, barroom brawls, and petty thefts fill our front office, the Kydd meeting with each of the accused in the conference room, first come, first served. The more serious cases—the ones that warrant weekend lockup—won’t surface until Monday morning.

Harry and I pour mugs of coffee, then head upstairs to my office. Neither of us expects to get much work done today—we’re worn out from the week’s events—but we need to be here, ready to race to the courthouse, in case the Holliston jury reaches a decision. Generally speaking, jurors don’t like weekend duty, and they don’t like any duty a week before Christmas. A quick determination of Derrick Holliston’s fate wouldn’t surprise either of us.

Harry sets his mug on the coffee table and flops on the couch. I take a seat at my desk, figuring I’ll sort through the week’s phone messages and mail, then tackle the pile of pleadings our dutiful associate has stacked neatly on my credenza. The intercom buzzes before I get started, though, and I’m surprised. I didn’t think the Kydd would come up for air for another few hours. “Marty,” he says, “there’s someone here to see you. Her name’s Helene Wilson. She says you’re not expecting her, but it’ll just take a few minutes.”

“Send her up,” I tell him. Harry arches his eyebrows at me; we didn’t anticipate company.

She appears at the top of the spiral staircase in a red cable-knit sweater and blue jeans; the Kydd must have already taken her coat. “I’m sorry to show up unannounced,” she says. “I was planning to make an appointment on Monday, but I was driving by and saw all the cars parked outside and I thought maybe you were here, even though it’s Saturday. And then I thought maybe I shouldn’t wait until Monday.”

She’s worked up, speaking quickly, her cheeks flushed. I rummage around on my desk to find a legal pad and pen, then write: It’s fine. I’m glad to see you. If Senator Kendrick’s next-door neighbor has something additional to say, I want to hear it now, not later.

Harry’s on his feet and I make the introductions, hers out loud, his on paper. They both sit, side by side on the couch, and I grab a chair from in front of my desk and face them, my eyes on Helene, my legal pad and pen at the ready.

“I saw Senator Kendrick’s arraignment,” she says. “I was there, in the courthouse, yesterday.”

Of course she was. I noticed her before we got started; I noticed her troubled eyes. But I didn’t see her—or anyone else, for that matter—in the frenzied blur that followed.

“I also watched it on the eleven o’clock news last night,” she says. “The reporter described it as nothing short of a circus. I have to admit I agreed with him.”

No argument here. I wait while Helene seems to search, struggle even, for her next words.

“Is he sticking to it?” she asks at last. “Is the Senator still claiming he killed the young woman?”

I nod again, though I’m aware that if Charles Kendrick had changed his mind during the last twelve hours, I’d probably be the last to know.

She presses one hand to her neck and shakes her head. Again her eyes are worried, her expression distressed. “Something is terribly wrong,” she says.

I lean forward, closer to her. Harry eyes her carefully too. Why do you say that? I scribble.

“Because Michelle Forrester was alive and well when she left the Senator’s home on Friday morning,” she says. “I saw her leave. It was her car. I saw it.” She points at her eyes, as if she thinks I might not trust that other sense of hers. She’s wrong, though; I do. I trust all of Helene Wilson’s senses.

Harry reaches for the pen and paper. He looks bothered, maybe even skeptical. The BMW roadster is a popular car, he writes. Maybe it’s a coincidence; maybe a different roadster happened down your lane that morning, then turned around when the driver realized it’s a dead end.

She shakes her head before he puts the pen down. “No,” she insists, “it wasn’t. They showed her BMW roadster on the news last night. And they reported for the first time that it has a silk rose attached to the antenna, a yellow one. That was the car I saw, fake flower and all.”

Harry and I are quiet as we absorb this information. Neither of us watched the news last night. By the time we were finished with dinner at Pete’s, we were both having trouble keeping our eyes open. Harry even considered passing on dessert, but the crème brûlée brought him to his senses.

The intercom buzzes yet again and it takes me a moment to react. It squawks three times before I answer, and I can hear the frustration in the Kydd’s breathing even before he speaks. He’s right; we do need a secretary. He’s doing way too many things at once, a well-known recipe for malpractice. “What is it?” I ask, still staring at Helene.

“Big Red called,” he says. “The jury’s done. You guys have a verdict.”

Chapter 28

Weekend verdicts tend to slip beneath the public’s radar screen—at least until the following Monday. Most journalists and courtroom aficionados are at home with their families on weekends, tending to household chores, watching their sons and daughters play the season’s sports, or, at this time of year, trimming a tree. So I expected the parking lot to be relatively empty when Harry and I pulled into the county complex in his Jeep on this snowy Saturday. I was wrong.

Like the lot, the main courtroom in the Superior Courthouse is packed. Big Red is the only bailiff on duty and he’s got his hands full. The county will cough up time-and-a-half for his services today, just as it will for our stenographer and Dottie Bearse. All three of them will earn every last penny of it, none more so than Big Red. The benches and aisles are already full, so he props open the rear double doors. The overflow crowd can watch from the hallway, though it’s unlikely they’ll hear anything at that distance. He can’t send them downstairs to the conference room on a Saturday. There’s no staff on duty to monitor the room, no technician to record the proceedings.

Geraldine and Clarence are seated at their table, their demeanors decidedly different than they were forty-eight hours ago. The defendant’s conviction looked like a slam dunk then. It doesn’t at the moment. And even if they pull it off—even if the jurors agree with Geraldine that her office’s failure to disclose the disappearance of the monstrance doesn’t amount to a hill of beans—the appeal will be a nightmare. Geraldine looks stressed. Clarence looks much worse.

The side door opens and two guards usher Derrick Holliston to our table. He’s neatly groomed, as he has been throughout trial, and he seems completely composed, at ease, as if whatever is about to happen in this room is of little consequence to him. He pauses when he reaches the table, staring at something behind me, and I turn to find out what’s caught his attention. It’s Bobby the Butcher—and Monsignor Davis—side by side in the front row behind our table.

“Sit down,” I tell Holliston. “Turn the hell around and sit down.”

He does, but he takes his time about it, sneering at the two before he complies. When I check on them again, their eyes say it all. The Monsignor would like to save Holliston’s soul. The Butcher would like to wring his neck.

The two jurors who were informed they were alternates at the close of the case yesterday are here too, chatting in the front row behind Geraldine’s table. One is a twenty-five-year-old landscaper who paid particularly keen attention throughout the trial. He seemed genuinely disappointed to learn he wouldn’t get to deliberate with the others. His companion is Maria Marzetti’s admirer from the back row. I suspect his presence here is only partially attributable to his interest in the case.

Harry plants his elbows on the table, his head in his hands. He looks far more worried than Holliston does. His isn’t the usual defense attorney’s concern, though. The jurors in this case have four choices, four potential verdicts, as is true in most first-degree-murder trials. And Harry’s not sure which one of them worries him most.

In all murder cases, the judge is obligated to instruct the jury on every lesser-included offense that might be supported by the evidence. Case law is clear that an instruction is required where any view of the evidence would support the lesser-included result. As a practical matter, this means most murder juries are asked to choose from among first-degree, second-degree, and manslaughter charges. The fourth option, of course—available only if the jurors believe Holliston acted to preserve his own life—is an outright acquittal.

Geraldine argued yesterday that a manslaughter instruction shouldn’t be given in this case. No view of the evidence would support such a result, she said. Giving an instruction on it would do nothing more than invite a compromise verdict. And not giving the instruction would actually benefit the defendant, she claimed. If the jurors fail to find the required elements of second-degree murder, they’ll have no choice but to acquit.

Our District Attorney’s argument was a loser. Voluntary manslaughter is defined as an unlawful killing with intent to kill, but without malice. The statute specifically provides that a killing is done “without malice” if it results from an excessive use of force during self-defense or if it occurs in the heat of passion caused by reasonable provocation. Technically, at least, the jury could be justified in finding either of those scenarios in Holliston’s case.

Judge Gould didn’t buy Geraldine’s pitch from the outset, but he actually laughed when she purported to have the defendant’s best interests at heart. “We’re not in Las Vegas, Ms. Schilling,” he said, “and this court is not a casino. We’re not here to force the defendant to roll the dice and then live with his losses.” That was the end of the argument. And Harry never said a word.

Big Red calls us to our feet as the chambers door opens and Judge Gould strides quickly to the bench. He’s in his robe, business as usual, but today his shirt collar is unbuttoned beneath it, the absence of a tie his only nod to Saturday. “Bring them in,” he says as he sits, and Big Red heads for the side door. Holliston watches him leave, then looks down at the table and shakes his head. “I still don’t like that guy,” he mutters.

“Rumor has it he doesn’t think a hell of a lot of you, either,” I tell him.

That notion seems to strike our hotheaded client as preposterous; he bolts upright and glares at me. I feel a sudden relief about reaching the end of the road in this case, no matter what the verdict might be. I’m tired of Derrick John Holliston. And I’ve had more than enough of his angry eyes.

Big Red returns in seconds, the jurors filing into the courtroom behind him in complete silence. Most of them avert their eyes—they look at their hands, the clock, the floor—as they take their seats in the box. Not all, though. Robert Eastman and Alex Doane stare directly at us—at Holliston, in fact—as soon as they enter the room. Maria Marzetti does too. I scan the panel quickly, searching for the telltale white paper, and it takes only a few seconds for me to spot it. Gregory Harmon clutches the form in his right hand. It’s the verdict slip; the one guy Harry would have kept off the panel had Holliston not called the shots is our foreman. He stares straight ahead as he sits; his expression reveals nothing.

Judge Gould bids the jurors good morning as they take their seats and they all return the sentiment. He nods to our table and Harry and I get to our feet. Holliston takes his time joining us, as if this is our moment of truth, not his. The guards who ushered him into the courtroom have been standing near his chair since they got here, but they inch closer to it now, their readiness palpable.

The judge pauses to allow Dottie Bearse to recite the docket number and then he turns back to the panel. “Ladies and gentlemen,” he says, “have you reached a verdict?”

Gregory Harmon stands. “We have, Your Honor.” His eleven compatriots remain seated, nodding in agreement. There’s not a sound in the room. If the spectators are breathing, they’re doing it on the sly.

Big Red hustles to the jury box, retrieves the verdict slip from Gregory Harmon, and ferries it across the courtroom to the bench. Judge Gould reads in silence, his expression a well-rehearsed neutral.

The judge passes the form back to Big Red, then turns to Dottie again. This time she stands at her desk. “Mr. Foreman,” she says, “in the matter of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts versus Derrick John Holliston, on the charge of murder in the first degree, murder committed with extreme atrocity or cruelty, what say you?”

Holliston drums his fingers on the table. He’s impatient; it seems he’s got other matters to attend to. I step on his foot, hard. He glares at me yet again, but at least he stops drumming.

Big Red returns the verdict slip to Gregory Harmon and the foreman opens it to read. He doesn’t need to do that, of course; he knows what it says. “On the charge of murder in the first degree,” he intones, “we find the defendant, Derrick John Holliston, not guilty.”

The courtroom erupts. More than a few of the spectators shout angry criticisms at the jurors. An even greater number actually boo. The Barnstable County Superior Courthouse sounds like Fenway Park during a Derek Jeter at-bat.

Judge Gould bangs his gavel repeatedly, but it has little effect. Holliston turns around and half sits on our table, a small smile spreading across his lips. I turn too, to take in the scene. Most of the spectators are on their feet, and more than a few of the shouters have their fists in the air. Big Red hurries down the center aisle, pulling the worst offenders from the benches, steering them toward the back doors. He’s having a hard time ejecting them, though. The overflow crowd has the exit blocked.

The judge is on his feet now too, his gavel working like a jack-hammer. He calls for quiet repeatedly, and the free-for-all settles down a bit after a half dozen of his pleas. “We’ll sit here all day,” he shouts, “and we’ll eject every last one of you, if that’s what it takes to restore order.”

Holliston lets out a little laugh beside me; he’s enjoying this.

Monsignor Davis isn’t. He and the Butcher may be the only two people in the room who are still in their seats. The Monsignor’s eyes are closed, his head bowed and his lips moving rapidly. Silent prayers, I presume, for everyone in this courtroom. The Butcher’s eyes are closed too—they’re squeezed shut, in fact—and his fists are clenched. I’m glad he’s not standing in either of the side aisles. If there were a wall anywhere close to him, I’m pretty sure he’d punch a hole in it. Whatever modicum of confidence he may have had left in our judicial system after his own ordeal with Derrick Holliston has just gone up in smoke.

Big Red has managed to part the lobby crowd, creating a path by which his dozen or so worst offenders can exit. The noise level drops a notch once they’re gone, but the judge keeps hammering. “Quiet,” he shouts, “this instant.” And this time, for some reason, he gets it.

“Another outburst like that,” he says, still catching his breath as he sits, “and we will empty the gallery.” He waits, letting his words sink in, like an angry parent threatening to ground a wayward teenager. “Ms. Bearse,” he says at last, “you may proceed.”

Generally speaking, the courtroom is not a place for the weak-kneed. Even Dottie Bearse, who’s spent her entire adult life working in this arena, looks shaken. She pours a glass of water at her desk and takes a long drink. Her face has gone pale and her hands are trembling. “Mr. Foreman,” she says, her voice noticeably quieter than it was a few minutes ago, “in the matter of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts versus Derrick John Holliston, on the charge of murder in the second degree, murder committed with malice, but without deliberate premeditation or extreme atrocity and cruelty, what say you?”

Gregory Harmon swallows hard as he opens the verdict slip to read again. The document is merely a crutch, of course. If he keeps his gaze fixed on the written word, he avoids the possibility of eye contact with the man whose fate he’s pronouncing. At least two of his fellow jurors don’t seem to need any such device. Robert Eastman and Alex Doane haven’t stopped staring at Holliston since they got here.

“On the charge of murder in the second degree,” Gregory Harmon recites, “we find the defendant, Derrick John Holliston…” The foreman pauses and, much to my surprise, he looks up, directly at Holliston. “Not guilty.”

Maybe it’s due to the effectiveness of Judge Gould’s threats. Or maybe the spectators used up their outrage when the murder-one verdict was announced. Whatever the reason, the courtroom at this moment is still, silent.

The judge seems surprised by the quiet too. He has his gavel in hand, but he doesn’t need it. “Ms. Bearse,” he says, “you may proceed.”

“Mr. Foreman,” Dottie says, “in the matter of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts versus Derrick John Holliston, on the charge of voluntary manslaughter, a killing with intent but without malice, done either through an excessive use of force in self-defense or in the heat of passion caused by reasonable provocation, what say you?”

Gregory Harmon is still looking directly at Holliston. He doesn’t bother to read from the verdict slip this time. “On the charge of voluntary manslaughter,” he says quietly, “we find the defendant, Derrick John Holliston…”

He drops his hands to his sides, the verdict slip folded in two, cupped in one palm. His eyes are still fixed on our client. And his gaze is steady.

“Guilty.”

Holliston’s up. The guards lunge for him at once, but they’re not fast enough. His chair topples backward to the floor. Our table flips over in the other direction. And then all hell breaks loose. The crowd is in an uproar.

“This is bogus!” Holliston screams over the din. The guards tackle him and within seconds, they have him out flat on the carpet, on his stomach, cuffed and shackled. He’s still screaming, though, struggling against the thick arms that restrain him, trying to be heard above the angry mob in the gallery. “Bogus!” he yells at the panel again. “You people don’t get it,” he screams. “That priest attacked me! This ain’t nothin’ but bogus!”

Again, Derrick Holliston’s legal analysis is lacking. The verdict isn’t bogus. In many ways, it’s entirely consistent with his version of events. The crime-scene photographs have excessive force written all over them.

Holliston staggers when the guards yank him to his feet, the shackles preventing him from finding a natural stance. His wrists are cuffed behind his back, so he points at Harry the only way he can, with his chin. “Defective assistance of counsel,” he shouts at Judge Gould. “That’s what we got here. Defective assistance of counsel.”

“Ineffective,” Harry tells him.

Holliston looks perplexed; he actually shuts up for a few seconds.

“The word’s ineffective,” Harry explains. “It’s ineffective assistance of counsel.”

“There, you see?” Holliston says to the judge. “He admits it.”

“Call for the colloquy, Your Honor,” Harry says.

The colloquy is a ritual employed for the recording of verdicts in criminal cases in the Commonwealth. It occurs after the foreperson announces the verdict in open court and the clerk marks it on the indictment form. Though not required by any published rule or statute, well-established case law mandates the use of the colloquy in all criminal cases. In a vehicular-homicide case that Harry and I tried together last year, a juror suffered a heart attack and died after the verdict was returned, but before the colloquy was conducted. On appeal, Harry argued that the affirmation of the other eleven jurors was insufficient to sustain the guilty verdict. He won, the appellate court agreeing with his claim that a valid verdict can be rendered only by the final concurrence of twelve jurors.

We’re in no shape to begin the colloquy at the moment, of course. Our table is still on its side, files and papers strewn across the carpeted floor, soggy from the contents of the now empty water pitcher. But Harry wants to call for the process quickly, at least, before Holliston gets himself ejected from the courtroom.

Judge Gould doesn’t respond to Harry’s request; he turns to our client instead. “Mr. Holliston,” he says, “I am loathe to prevent any criminal defendant from witnessing every moment of his trial.”

One of the guards moves Holliston out of the way as if he’s a dog on a lead, while the other helps Big Red right the table. Harry joins them in picking up the mess.

“But mark my words, sir,” the judge continues, “I will have you removed from this courtroom forthwith if you cause any further disruption.”

The guard points Holliston to his now upright chair and he shuffles toward it, his face red, his eyes furious, the judge’s admonition apparently of no concern.

Judge Gould takes a deep breath and looks out into the gallery. It’s quiet now; the spectators seem to have been shocked back into silence when the furniture flew. “Ms. Bearse,” he says, “you may begin.”

Dottie stands, looking even more unnerved than she did after the first melee. “Mr. Foreman,” she says, “and members of the jury, harken to your verdicts. On your oath, you do say that on the indictment for voluntary manslaughter, Derrick John Holliston is guilty, so say you, Mr. Foreman?”

Gregory Harmon has been on his feet this entire time. “Yes,” he says. “I do.”

Dottie looks to the other members of the panel. “So say you all?”

Eleven heads nod. “Yes,” they say in unison.

Harry’s up. “Call for a poll,” he says.

Harry calls for a jury poll after every guilty verdict, regardless of how clear the jurors’ answers are during the colloquy. In essence, the poll asks the same questions the colloquy does, but it puts the matter to each juror individually. Though it’s unlikely any of them will change the answer, even a slight hesitation can fuel a flurry of post-trial motions and appellate arguments. Harry says it’s malpractice for a defender to fail to call for a poll, and I think he’s right.

“Mr. Harmon,” Dottie begins, “is this your verdict?”

“It is,” he answers.

“And is it the unanimous verdict of this jury?”

“Yes,” he says as he sits.

“Mrs. Rowlands,” Dottie continues, “is this your verdict?”

“Yes,” she says. “That’s my verdict.”

“And is it the unanimous verdict of this jury?”

“It most certainly is,” Cora replies.

Dottie continues through the front row of the jury box, putting the same pair of questions to each juror, getting the same pair of responses in return. Holliston doesn’t react until Maria Marzetti delivers her double affirmative. “I told you she was a cat-lick,” he mutters.

“Your powers of perception are staggering,” I tell him.

He nods. At last we agree on something.

Geraldine leaves her chair and walks toward our table while Dottie Bearse continues the poll. It’s not any of us the District Attorney is interested in, though. She walks behind Harry’s chair, keeping her distance from Holliston, and leans over the bar. “I’m sorry,” she says to Monsignor Davis.

“Don’t be,” he tells her. “It’s enough. Mr. Holliston will have plenty of time to reflect upon his wrongdoing. Maybe he’ll even ask the good Lord for forgiveness. Father McMahon wouldn’t have wanted anything more.”

Holliston snorts beside me and I elbow him. Geraldine glares at both of us. “Maybe not,” she says to the Monsignor, “but I sure as hell did.”

I’m sure she did. But overall, I believe Geraldine Schilling is relieved. Holliston isn’t going to walk, after all. With a different jury, a panel more offended by prosecutorial misconduct, he may have. I’m pretty sure Harry is relieved for the same reason.

Dottie wraps up the poll, eliciting twenty-four affirmatives in all, none the least bit hesitant, none uncertain in any way. Judge Gould thanks her when she finishes and then turns to the panel. “Ladies and gentlemen,” he says, “I extend the county’s sincere thanks to each and every one of you. Jury service is vital to our system, essential to the preservation of a free society. You have served well.”

“My ass,” Holliston says. I should stomp on his foot again, but I don’t bother.

“Now before you go,” the judge continues, “I warn you that the attorneys in this case—at least some of them—will try to speak with you before you leave the courthouse. And although they were prohibited from having any direct contact with you while the case was ongoing, it’s perfectly appropriate for them to do so now. They’ll undoubtedly want to know what evidence you found persuasive, what issues were key to your decision. You’re free to converse with them if you so choose, but you’re under no obligation to do so. As of this moment, your service is complete. You’re free to go. And you take with you the sincere thanks of this court.”

With that, Big Red leads his charges back to the jury room to retrieve coats, hats, and other personal belongings. Harry gives me the eye and I head for the back doors, Clarence Wexler just a few steps behind me. Harry will stay here, in the courtroom, to make post-trial motions, and Geraldine will stay to oppose them. Harry will move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, when he loses that one, he’ll move for a new trial. These motions are argued routinely after guilty verdicts are returned. And just as routinely, they’re denied. While that’s going on, I’ll try to corner as many jurors as I can. So will Clarence.

Gregory Harmon and Cora Rowlands are the first to appear in the hallway, Robert Eastman and Alex Doane right behind them. I approach them and they stop as a group, seemingly willing to chat for a few minutes, at least. “Excessive force?” I ask. “Is that what you hung your hat on?”

Gregory Harmon nods as the other three turn to him, giving him the floor. Once the foreman, always the foreman. “Pretty much,” he says. He seems uncomfortable, though.

Clarence snags the next group that emerges from the jury room and he ushers the three of them away from us, to the other side of the corridor. If they’re going to tell him his screw-up with the monstrance was significant, he doesn’t want me—or any other member of the bar—within earshot.

“Does that mean you believe Mr. Holliston’s version of events?” I ask my foursome. “Do you believe Father McMahon attacked him first?”

They exchange knowing glances but no one answers. I wait, surprised that the question is so difficult. “Not exactly,” Harmon says at last.

“What then?”

“Excessive force is what we hung our hat on,” he says. “It’s not really what we believe.”

I’m confused. Their expressions tell me it shows.

“We don’t believe Father McMahon attacked that young man,” Cora Rowlands says. “We don’t even think the priest made advances. We just couldn’t say, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he didn’t.”

Four more jurors come through the doorway and hurry past us, their downcast eyes saying they aren’t interested in participating in our discussion; they can’t get out of the courthouse fast enough.

“But if you couldn’t say that beyond a reasonable doubt,” I ask my group, “didn’t you feel you should acquit?” That’s sure as hell what the judge told them to do. He specifically instructed them that they should acquit Mr. Holliston unless the Commonwealth proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he did not act in self-defense.

They all shake their heads. “No way,” Alex Doane says. “After what he did to Father McMahon, to another human being? No way were we putting him back on the street.”

The jury room door opens again, and Maria Marzetti joins us. Alex Doane and Robert Eastman part to make room for her and then Eastman points toward the courtroom. “There’s a lot of anger in that young man,” he says.

He’s right about that, of course. But the last time I checked, harboring anger wasn’t a punishable offense on the Commonwealth’s penal code. I can’t help feeling that Harry and I short-changed Derrick Holliston somehow. Gregory Harmon seems to read my mind. “You and your partner did a good job,” he says, “but you had one lousy client to work with.”

Cora Rowlands nods in agreement. “He’s trouble,” she adds, “that much is clear.”

“Let me make sure I have this straight,” I tell them. “You couldn’t find beyond a reasonable doubt that Holliston didn’t act in self-defense, but you convicted him of manslaughter anyway?”

They all look at one another before nodding at me. “That’s what we did,” Gregory Harmon says, “and we justified it with the excessive-force provision. But the bottom line is—that guy needs to go to jail. No way he should be walking the streets.”

With that, four of them leave. Maria Marzetti hangs back, though. She says nothing, keeps her eyes on the hallway floor, until her cohorts are out of sight. “Listen,” she says when she finally looks up at me, “I’m not particularly proud of the route we took, but in my heart, I believe justice was served here.”

I shake my head at her. “Were the judge’s instructions unclear?”

“Not at all,” she says. “As far as they went, they were perfectly clear. But we didn’t feel they went far enough. We didn’t feel they really covered this situation.”

I lean against the wall, wondering why we bother to give jury instructions in the first place.

“Sometimes you have to trust your gut,” Maria adds. “And in the end, that’s what the twelve of us did.” She gives me a small smile, an almost apologetic one, and then heads down the hallway.

“Maria!” It’s her back-row admirer, emerging from the courtroom with the rest of the spectators. Harry’s post-trial motions were denied even faster than usual, it seems. She stops and turns around at the sound of her name and her newfound friend pulls ahead of the crowd, hurrying in her direction. She seems happy to see him. Maybe something positive will result from this fiasco of a trial after all.