Текст книги "The Future of the Humankind The Dictatorship of Conscience or the Tyranny of Bible Owners"
Автор книги: (IP of the USSR) Internal Predictor of the USSR
сообщить о нарушении
Текущая страница: 2 (всего у книги 4 страниц)
During that ten years Islam spread in the Arabian society peacefully since Muhammad’s preach met a demand of Manuel II and Benedict XVI. Muhammad reasoned righteously and spoke nicely and earnestly. And Islam that time wasn’t a kind of (if to use modern terms) “totalitarian sect”. Because Muhammad answered essentially all vitally important questions, which Islam followers as well as others asked him. However not everybody liked that, what Muhammad taught.
But Manuel II and Benedict XVI as well haven’t remembered about the morality: neither generally nor concerning specifically those morals, which are cultivated in the society by each of the historically formed traditional religions. And all theological talks and preaches become a kind of atheism without such specification. This is so because God himself has His own morality[29], and every man who wants to be in harmony with God should follow Gods own morality ignoring (or even breaking) historically formed cultural traditions. And this is a meaning of man becoming like God[30].
And though one can agree with what Manuel II Palaiologos wrote: “For assuring a sensible soul, there is no necessity to use neither one’s hands, nor weapon, nor another meaning of threatening a man with death…” – he had told nothing about how to defend against aggressive, “not sensible and imprudent souls” which don’t accept the “assuring preach”. And indeed, Muhammad and first Muslims faced exactly such problem: not everyone who disliked Muhammad’s teaching remained passive and sluggish.
Originally peaceful spread of Islam in the Arabian society met an armed opposition just because enemies of Islam had nothing to object to Muhammad neither during dialogues and public disputes nor fabricating arguments beforehand; and their attempts to bribe him for stopping his preaches were futile. Their resistance to spreading of Islam appeared as a trade embargo of first Muslims (it was an attempt of economical genocide) and as several murderous assaults at Muhammad. It made Muhammad and his followers to leave Mecca (recognized centre of Arabian culture) for provincial city of Medina where he could continue his preach from. And only after 10 years of the peaceful preach the first jihad was started as a defensive war for Islam against the aggressors. It wasn’t a motiveless Muslim aggression for seizing and conquering the rest of the world.
Muslims won that first jihad in the history. And for many of those, who fought against them with great obstinacy, that victory became a conclusive proof of that God and Rightness-Truth were on the side Muhammad and Muslims and not on the side of their enemies. After it many former opponents of Muslims sincerely adopted Islam. And those who rejected Islam were let to go away. There were no repressions of former enemies.
With all this Koran makes numerous warnings to those, who justify their aggressive and predatory actions with religious motives like “jihad”. Particularly:
“O, you who believe! when you go to war in God's way, make investigation [be careful to discriminate], and do not say to any one who offers you peace: “You are not a believer” seeking the chance profits of this life [so that ye may despoil him]. But with God there are abundant gains; you too were such before (i.e. you too were not believers – our explanation when citing), then God conferred a benefit on you; therefore make investigation; surely God is aware of what you do (i.e. you can never deceive God – our explanation when citing)”. (Sura 4:94 based on translations of Shakir and Pickthal; in square brackets are notes by Pickthal).
“And if one of the idolaters seek protection from you, grant him protection till he hears the word of God, then make him attain his place of safety; this is because they are a people who do not know (the Truth – our explanation when citing)”. (Sura 9:6).
Thus following Koran one founds that the mission of teaching the idolaters is supreme. And as referred to Koranic teaching, extermination of ignorant folks who don’t know the truth is a great sin. And it is a sin all the more when under slogans of jihad – the holy war for defence of the religion and the Rightness-Truth – one destroys ignorant people, whom the Koranic afflatus hasn’t been given to, or wages aggressive and conquering war. Naturally an irreproachable namaz[31] made five times a day will not save against “karmic” and religious retribution for such actions. It is said in Sunnah[32] that God’s servant gets from the prayer only what he had understood. And if he wants to understand nothing, his life’s sense is far from one given in Koran, and there are not perspectives for such “Muslim” save the worst ones.
As you can see, if to know the text of Koran, understand its sense and compare it with the life (including the history of forming the Muslim culture as well), Benedict XVI himself could reproach the Muslim world in general and its creation – terrorists-extremists – personally with renouncing the precepts for Muslims given in Koran.
And nothing, save his own misunderstanding of Koran and maybe some esoteric order discipline, prevented Iran’s president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from telling all this and something more from U.N.O. podium and from saying it to George Bush’s face during their personal meeting.
However there is none of this. And an impression arises that “The Satanic Verses” by Salman Rushdie (first published in 1988), caricatures on prophet Muhammad in the European press (autumn 2005) and artificially inspired hysterical reaction of Muslim world for Pope’s lecture in on September 12, 2006[33] are the links of one chain. It seems that they are included into the long termed attempt to waken a new World War – the global conflict between bearers of the historically formed biblical culture in its different modifications[34] and followers of the historically formed Islam. And it seems more and more evident that hierarchies of both cultures either understand nothing or are interested themselves in saving prerequisites for the conflict.
Benedict XVI, being a man who has devoted his life to the theology (which cannot be separated from the history of mankind and each of the nations), had to know it not just by his lecture in Regensburg but much more earlier – by taking the cardinal’s order[35].
Nevertheless, this is not an answer to the question whether the Koranic teaching is true. This just shows that Muhammad was convincing in his preach and was one of the most prominent practical politicians during the history of our global civilization. And such words are not about the vast majority of Muslims after Muhammad. And of course not about the extremists, who use Islamic slogans only for hiding real aims of those global policy bosses who manipulate with them (it is objective, i.e. it doesn’t depend on declaration of those extremists).
The West in general (and especially followers of its traditional religions including the Russian Orthodoxy) for centuries is sure of its permanent political rightness and the global civilizing mission towards all nations of other regions of the Earth. And as a consequence of this, Muslim world, which rejects such civilizing mission, seems for western intellectuals to be very aggressive without a cause. However, naturally the West doesn’t want to understand not just Koran but as well the Bible, which all its culture (including Russia that is the West and the East at once) is based on. The West doesn’t want to know the matter of its civilizing mission! It fears to face the truth. Let’s turn to Bible:
« You shall not charge interest on loans to your brother (your fellow Jew, as it fo l lows from the context) interest on money, interest on food, interest on anything that is lent for interest . You may charge a foreigner (i.e. a non-Jew) interest, but you may not charge your brother interest, that the LORD your God (i.e. the devil, if one judges the essence of usurious parasitism according to one’s conscience) may bless you in all that you undertake in the land that you are entering to take possession of it (the latter refers not only to ancient times and not only to Palestine, the land promised to ancient Hebrews, b e cause it is a quotation not from a transcript of the ancient roll found at the place of excavations but from a widely published book claimed by all Churches and a part of the intelligentsia as the eternal truth suppo s edly passed on from above ) » – Deuteronomy, 23:19, 20.
« And you shall lend to many nations, but you shall not borrow » – Deuteronomy, 28:12.
«Foreigners(i.e. subsequent generations of the non-Hebrews who have run into a debt which could be repaid by no means to the tribe of usurious coreligionists) shall build up your walls (today many Arab families from Palestine are dependant on the opportunity of working in Israel), and their kings shall minister to you(«I am the Jew of kings» – was the way one of the Rothschilds answered the unfortunate compliment of «You are the king of Jews»); for in my wrath I struck you, but in my favour I have had mercy on you. Your gates shall be open continually; day and night they shall not be shut, that people may bring to you the wealth of the nations, with their kings led in procession. For the nation and kingdom that will not serve you shall perish; those nations shall be utterly laid waste» – Isaiah, 60:10-12.
The hierarchies of all the so-called Christian Churches, including Russian Orthodox, claim this abominable conception to be holy, while the canon of the New Testament which had been censored and edited as far back as prior to the Nicene Council (325 AD) proclaims it in the name of Christ as the righteous Will of God for all the times to come having no grounds whatsoever to do so.
«Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets(the Law and the Prophets means the Old Testament); I have not come to abolish them but to fulfil them. For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished» – Matthew, 5:17, 18.
Since one considers the Bible to be the Holy book, and is assured that the Afflatus from Above hasn’t been perverted in it, the racial-“elitist” fascistic usurious “Deuteronomy-Isaiah” doctrine of enslaving all the world has become the main political doctrine in the biblical civilization culture. Moreover, the New Testament programs the psyche of Christian churches followers for submission to the bosses of the biblical project for enslaving all:
« But I say to you, do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if anyone would sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well » – Matthew, 5:39, 40. « Judge not, that you be not judged (i.e. you have no right to decide what is Good and what is Evil in the Life, thus – resist noting!) » – Matthew, 7:1.
This is the concrete meaning of the Bible (according to texts of Russian Orthodox Church’s Bible, including Septuagint) which governs the entire Biblical civilization. The rest of the Bible is unimportant or attendant to that conception.
That what is written above is the global political doctrine of enslaving the whole mankind in a name of God and of destroying everyone who does not agree with it (and first of all of those who resist it with their thoughts, words and deeds, including military deeds). There is a place in it for atheists, who live with their material problems, and for those, who believe the historically formed Judaism to be the Truth, and for those, who believe to the historically formed Christian churches, which rejected and consigned to oblivion all what Christ taught his contemporaries.
And don’t consider this global political doctrine to be a product of “occasional graphorrhea” of many people in many generations, but not a political creation of a certain group of persons – initiators of the project and their heritors. Even if it had appeared “by its own” as a result of a “spontaneous graphorrhea” of Biblical authors and editors, after some time a corporation of masters of this doctrine would have appeared, and they would have trying to get the world mastery on its basis. So, this doctrine must have its masters and bosses for ages. However they don’t look for the world fame and don’t wait for any gratitude for their deeds from the mankind. Thus they prefer to act indirectly or anonymously. Moreover the majority of people are so “clever” that they will object to be just “cattle” in this doctrine simply prejudicially without understanding the History.
So, without verbiage, the civilizing mission of the West is to enslave everybody. And that’s why:
If the Bible is from God, the best way is – to agree with it and submit the hierarchy of Life-interpreters on its basis;
And if this doctrine of enslaving everybody is indeed the creation of power-seeking persons and is a malicious calumny on God, then to object it and let it spread till the global scales – means to be in the evident conflict with God!
However, how the cited words of different biblical culture representatives and other western mass-media publications show, the West doesn’t realize neither the biblical doctrine of enslaving everybody, nor the peculiarities of policy based on it, nor the consequences of the policy aimed on the doctrine realization.
Koran resist against the realization of the biblical global policy. And Islam (even the historically formed Islam, which rejected the Koranic precepts, like Judaism and Christianity rejected Afflatuses given to Moses and Christ) follows Koran in it.
Thus Islamic world call the policy expressing the biblical doctrine of enslaving everybody ‘satanism’. And this agrees to the Koranic opinion on this policy realization principles (our explanation when citing is given in italic):
«275. Those who swallow down usury (i.e. gets the loan interest, including the dividends) cannot arise (on the Judgement Day) except as one whom Devil has prostrated by (his) touch does rise. That is because they say, “trading is only like usury” (in other words: trading income is like the loan interest); and God has allowed trading and forbidden usury. To whomsoever then the admonition has come from his Lord, then he desists (taking up usury), he shall be pardoned for the past, and his affair is in the hands of God; and whoever returns (to it) – these are the inmates of the fire; they shall abide in it.
276. God does not bless usury, and He causes charitable deeds to prosper, and God does not love any ungrateful sinner!
277. Surely they who believe and do good deeds and establish regular prayers and regular charity they shall have their reward from their Lord, and they shall have no fear, nor shall they grieve.
278. O you who believe! Be careful of (your duty to) God and relinquish what remains (due) from usury, if you are believers.
279. But if you do (it) not, then be apprised of war from God and His Messenger; and if you repent [and turn back (to the Life and God’s precepts)], then you shall have your capital; neither shall you make (the debtor) suffer loss, nor shall you be made to suffer loss» (Koran, Sura 2, based on Shakir and Yusufali translations).
And this is not the only caution against usury in any of its forms, which is given in Koran.
However, there is no compulsion in religion. And every man after getting acquainted with the biblical doctrine and the Koranic opinion on it has an opportunity to decide by himself:
Either the biblical doctrine of enslaving everybody and destroying those, who disagree with it, is from God;
Or God prohibited usury and ordered to resist actively the spread of biblical slavery. (And the question of using weapons against the spreaders, if they don’t heed wise and reasonable words, is a question specified by certain historical and cultural circumstances).
As it is told in Koran about enemies of Islam (the meaning of the word “Islam” can be interpreted in the best way by words “God’s Realm at the Earth”, i.e. it’s told not about enemies of the historically formed Muslim ceremonials, but about the qualitatively different things – much more important!):
« And most of them do not follow (anything) but conjecture; surely conjecture will not avail aught against the truth; surely God is cognizant of what they do! (Sura 10:36).
God has written down: I will most certainly prevail, I and My messengers; surely God is Strong, Mighty! (Sura 58:21) ».
4. Why are hierarchs of churches against the Rightness-Truth?
The main cause of why Judaism is rejecting Koran being a record of the Afflatus from Above and Muhammad being a messenger of the Lord is that Koran is blaming the biblical doctrine of enslaving the mankind for being satanism. Meanwhile there are no theological dogmatic discords between Judaism and Islam: in both teachings there is the Only God, He is a Creator and the Almighty. And He is the same God of Abraham-Ibrahim.
However the historically formed Islam hasn’t developed its own sociological doctrine of the level of global importance (alternative to the biblical one[36]) during more than 1300 years after its appearance. Thus it constantly demonstrates its feebleness and is a pitiful sight in aspect of the global policy. And it is easily provoked to different hysterics and even to terrorism! The idea about that all other nations, for which Arabian is a foreign language, followed Islam in its traditional ritualistic forms is contrary to the Koranic Afflatus; and that was noted from Above. That’s why it cannot be realized with God’s assistance. In other words one cannot unify the mankind on the basis of spreading the historically formed Islam as rituals hold in Arabian language alien for non-Arabs. Moreover one cannot reach it with violence and threatening. So, it’s vitally important that the world of traditionalistic and extremist ritualistic Islam understood it as quickly as possible.
But today (as one can judge from mass-media and Muslim theological works) the Islamic world doesn’t understand the algorithms of its conflicts with the West, and the West doesn’t understand it as well (may be except for its “world backstage”).
Discords between Islam and Christian churches are beyond sociological doctrines, since neither side has its own sociological doctrine[37]:
Zealous Christians either work for spread of the biblical project and thus grow the Evil, or “do not resist the one who is evil”[38].
Muslims-traditionalists live mostly with everyday needs and don’t have a political will neither for spreading Good, not for resisting to Evil.
Muslims-extremists are mostly possessed or zombies. Though they are the minority of world Muslims, but their actions are over-stressed by the world media and since are the most noticeable. However they also work for the biblical doctrine and do their part of the work. They create negative meaning about Islam and Koran outside the Muslim world. Thus their activity is directed right against the Koranic Islam. And are successful in their deeds as it can be understood from the publications cited in the current note and by general state of mass media of many countries for many years.
This ignorance and indifference of the most part of traditionally Muslim and traditionally Christian people in Russia to sociological doctrines formed on the unity of lifestyle. And in the past, it was the basis for peaceful co-existence and collaboration of Muslims and Christians in Russia.
The discords between Islam and Christian churches have purely theological-dogmatic character. That’s why their truthful solution means primarily an alive belief to God, and God’s participation in solving the discords, and living in good conscience. (Moreover both sides mostly agree that God talks to people through their conscience).
Islam on the basis of Koran strongly objects to the verity of dogma of Trinity and considers it to be a kind of polytheism. But it regards Christ as one of the messengers of the Almighty and esteems him as a prophet.
The historically formed Christianity cannot essentially object to Islam in theological questions:
There is no text of the “Good Message[39] of Jesus Christ to all people” in which Christ’s teaching was written down in clear and understandable form. There are four Gospels in the New Testament, which are brief biographical notes about Christ’s life and deeds among people. They contain only fragmentary parts of his teaching, since one could not avoid telling about what he had taught when talking of his life. If to collect these fragments all together one can see the text, which is agree with Koran if to read directly[40], but quite different to teaching of Churches in a name of Christ and the biblical doctrine of enslaving the mankind.
The Creed of Christian churches (The Nicene Creed)[41] is the creation of founding fathers of churches and of their supervisors from the “world backstage” of those years. There is no word by Christ and about his ideas in it!
Christ has never told any similar to the dogma of Trinity. And as one can understand it from the New Testament, Christ and Jews contemporary to him had no discords on the dogma of monotheism, common for Judaism and Islam. The dogma of Trinity doesn’t follows from the New Testament texts. And moreover, there are reasons to think that those texts were “censored and edited” before becoming the canonical texts of the New Testament, so that one could explain the Trinity as given in the New Testament in allegorical metaphorical form. And it took founding fathers of churches and their supervisors near 300 years to take and “edit” the original texts and formulating the dogma of Trinity[42].
Another divergence of Islam and Christianity is referred to his life at the earth. Koran says directly and unambiguously (our commentaries are given in italic, and underlined text is marked out by us):
«And they did not kill him(Jesus, as it is given in the text)nor did they crucify him, but it appeared to them so (like Isa(Jesus)) and most surely those who differ therein(i.e. those, who disagree with the Koranic testimony on it)are only in a doubt about it; they have no knowledge respecting it, but only follow a conjecture[43], and they killed him not for sure (Yusufali: «for of a surety they killed him not»). Nay! God took him up to Himself; and God is Mighty (Yusufali: «Exalted in Power»), Wise. And there is not one of the followers of the Book but most certainly believes in this (in the death of Jesus) before his death, and on the day of resurrection he (Isa) shall be a witness against them! (Koran, Sura 4:157-159, by Shakir)».
So from Koran one can understand that God answers with His unlimited mercy and power to the unlimited belief of man, who takes in good conscience (i.e. without a fear) God’s will and all, what he doesn’t know, as well. And it is like He promised it in Psalm 50:15: «And call upon Me in the day of trouble; I will deliver you, and you shall glorify Me», – and it has happened contrary to sratements of apostles.
It is very hard to disclaim the Koranic statement 4:157-159 for Christian churches, since with it together they have to disclaim many God’s promises, including given by Christ and written down by evangelists ones. In particular:
When Christ suggested apostles to pray together with him in Gethsemane, he warned them: « Watch and pray that you may not enter into temptation (text is marked out by us) » (Matthew, 26:41). However apostles – chosen and called ones – didn’t understand the importance of what was going on and ignored Christ’s warning. Thus they didn’t keep themselves waking and praying, and consequently entered into temptation. That’s why:
If to believe Christ, no their testimony about the following events is to be believed! If not to believe Christ, then one can believe testimonies of apostles; and all historically formed branches of Christianity (including the messianic Hebrews, who admit Christ to be the promised Messiah, but disclaim the dogma of Trinity) are based on it.
But the matter of the temptation, which Christ warned apostles about, is not the sleep as it is with all its dreams. The matter of the temptation is that apostles as all other, who hadn’t prayed with Christ, became victims of vision of the execution, but didn’t saw the ascension (the rescue), forestalling the execution.
It’s paradoxical that those who follow the historically formed Christianity believe in the miracle of the Immaculate Conception, believe in the Resurrection of Christ as though after his death, believe in dogma of Trinity not mentioned by Christ… But they reject to believe in the miracle of ascension before the execution, and even don’t ask themselves a question: Who did need that shameful execution of the righteous?
Did God, who is so powerful that He can forgive sins of men even when they are impious[44] and don’t belief, need it?
Or was it the “world backstage”, who wanted the undivided power over the Earth on behalf of God and besides of Him?
The attitude of Christian churches hierarchies to that Koranic statement is clear: If there were no execution since the ascension had forestalled the crucifying, then they lose their usual sinecure.
But why do today’s Christians – congregation, not the clergy – need, that the real execution of Christ took place in the past more, that the Sanhedrin needed it? Isn’t it because the belief in atonement for their sins with the self-sacrifice of the just doesn’t oblige them to self-perfection and lets sin more and more trusting in Christ’s intercession or his judge?
Moreover, another question appears. If the ascension saved Christ from the execution, how are they going to answer to God for the calumny on Him? The calumny that as though He sent Christ to the Earth for impious men executed him here and his self-sacrifice became the “offering of obsecration”[45] to God, Who ordained mercy on Himself even without it (Koran, 6:12)?
And all this is with the fact that the Koranic statement about Christ’s ascension, that saved him from execution, was not the new thesis, which Muhammad proclaimed. This Koranic statement just explains much more ancient Solomon’s prophesy about that ungodly would not see the mysteries of God, since their evilness would blind them[46]. And it explains the cited lines of David’s Psalm 49:15
In this life man can get answers on questions about Koran and Christian churches discords on dogma of Trinity and on Christ’s course of life during his first coming to the earth only through his inner world. I.e. they cannot be save subjective and speculative (theoretical). However, subjective agreement with one of the two religious traditions[47] is conditioned by the real morality of an individual. So, though there is no compulsion in religion, the chose of belief is predetermined by the real morality of an individual.
And man can become free from mistakes of this or that traditional religious teaching and from mistakes of his own chose as well, only in direct non-dogmatic alive dialog with God and living in good conscience after getting away all fears and greed which silence the voice of conscience.
5. The task is to prevent from unleashing the new world war on the basis of interconfessional enmity.
It is unambiguously told about the man’s predestination in Koran:
«Behold, thy Lord said to the angels: "I will create a vicegerent on earth." They said: "Wilt Thou place therein one who will make mischief therein and shed blood?– whilst we do celebrate Thy praises and glorify Thy holy (name)?" He said: "I know what ye know not."» (Koran, Sura 2:30, Yusufali).
And the Book Genesis says about the same man’s predestination, words differ but the sense is the same:
«The LORD God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to work it and keep it» (Genesis, 2:15).
And the New Testament says about the same:
«…since then the good news of the Kingdom of God is preached, and everyone forces his way into it» (Luke, 16:16). «But seek first the Kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you» (Matthew, 6:33). «You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. It shall not be so among you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant, and whoever would be first among you must be your slave, even as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many» (Matthew, 20:25-28).
In spite of this all historically formed confessions of so-called Abrahamic[48] religions, (in teachings of which there were expressed the self-interest of ruling “elites” of ancient societies and aspirations of their supervisors from the “world-backstage”, who wanted the unshared world domination on behalf of God but besides Him), turn their congregations – every man obedient to them – away from preparing himself for fulfilling this predestination and fulfilling his part in the mission of being God’s vicegerent at the Earth.
Nonetheless, one hasn’t enough time to complete the establishment of the global tyranny on basis of historically formed texts of Bible during the period, when organization of people’s psyche, their world-understanding and the speed of informational exchange between national cultures still gave such chance. The completion of the biblical project of enslaving the mankind was delayed:
Particularly because of inner dissensions between already-slaves of the biblical project: the split of once united Nicene-dogmatic church on the Roman-Catholic and different Orthodox churches; the secondary splits in them – the Reformation at the Catholic territory, Nikon’s persecutions against the Old Believers in Russia, various sects in Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant churches, etc.;
And particularly because of external factors. The vivid dialecticism of the Hellenic culture became to conceive and remake the killing dogmatism of original Judaism. Thus the “world backstage” of those years preferred to support the non-creative, imitative Roman culture and to suppress the creative Hellenic culture. Some time later it took three centuries to neutralize Christ’s teaching and to replace it with their own falsification in the religious cult. Then, like a bolt from the blue, the sending down of Koran and foundation of a new regional civilization on its basis. Some centuries later Genghis Khan destroyed many cultures – highly civilized but based on slavery: it was expressed in their ethics, showing the vicious morality. In 19th century biblical cults become being replaced with secular ideological totalitarianism of Marxism, which failed in the middle of 20th century. Thus Bolshevism in Russia showed its political will, and Stalin in “Economic Problems of Socialism in the U.S.S.R.” pronounced the capital sentence to Marxism, and they still cannot forgive it to him[49].
